2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparing Antegrade and Retrograde Parotidectomy: Surgical Parameters and Complications

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          Patotidectomy is the treatment of choice for superficial parotid gland lesions. The present study aimed to assess the facial nerve status, as well as peri-and postsurgical complications, in two surgical techniques (antegrade and retrograde) for parotidectomy.

          Materials and Methods:

          This study was conducted on 56 patients diagnosed with parotid neoplasms from 2013-2015. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups of antegrade and retrograde. In the retrograde group, the dissection was performed initially to expose the facial nerve branches, while in the antegrade approach, the facial nerve trunk was exposed initially. Different values, such as intraoperative bleeding, mass characteristics, and the time for different sections of the surgery, were noted. The facial nerve was examined after the surgery; moreover, hospital stay and drain removal time was also noted. During the six-month postoperative period, complications and squeals were also noted.

          Results:

          Based on the results, antegrade nerve dissection was performed in 24 patients, while retrograde nerve dissection was carried out in 25 patients. The two groups were compared for intraoperative bleeding, drain output, and drain removal time. Hospital stay was found to be statistically higher in the retrograde group (P<0.05). Other complications and morbidities, such as facial nerve trauma, sialoceles, salivary fistulas, Frey’s syndrome, skin sensory changes, and surgery time, were not statistically different (P≥0.05).

          Conclusions:

          As evidenced by the obtained results, retrograde dissection had higher intraoperative bleeding and longer hospital stay. It seems that skin flap dissection is more extensive in retrograde dissection, leading to more bleeding in this approach. These differences, although statistically significant, are not clinically important; consequently, surgeons’ experience and knowledge about the two approaches are of utmost importance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Surgical anatomy of the facial nerve and parotid gland based upon a study of 350 cervicofacial halves.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The clinical significance of the various anastomotic branches of the facial nerve. Report of 100 patients.

            During parotid dissection, we have found significant variations in the facial nerve branchings that have not been previously reported. One hundred patients, 48 males and 52 females, had their facial nerve photographed and/or diagrammed during parotid surgery. Ninety-nine patients had facial nerve configurations that could be divided into five main types. One nerve could not be classified into any of these types because of a bizarre configuration. Twenty-four percent of patients had a straight branching pattern (type I); 14% of patients had a loop involving the zygomatic division (type II); 44% of patients had a loop involving the buccal division (type III); 14% of patients had a complex pattern with multiple interconnections (type IV); and 3% of patients had two main trunks, one major and one minor (type V). Familiarity with these common variations in facial nerve anatomy is an absolute necessity for the operating surgeon.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An objective assessment of the advantages of retrograde parotidectomy.

              This study was undertaken to determine whether the retrograde parotidectomy approach is more efficient than standard anterograde parotidectomy without compromise of surgical effectiveness. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing parotidectomy was conducted. Cases were divided into those undergoing retrograde facial nerve dissection and those undergoing standard anterograde facial nerve dissection. From the review of medical records, standard demographic information, surgical time, histopathology, estimated blood loss, and use of facial nerve monitoring were determined. Pathology was reviewed to determine the size of the overall resection specimen as well as the size of the lesion excised and margin status. Postoperative complications were also recorded. Statistical comparisons were conducted between these 2 approaches for these clinical variables such as surgical time, blood loss, tumor margin status and relative volume of tissue removed during parotidectomy. 45 patients undergoing parotidectomy met inclusion criteria. The average patient age was 50.8 years with a female preponderance (73%). There were 19 standard parotidectomies and 26 retrograde approaches. Compared to standard parotidectomy, retrograde parotidectomy consumed less operative time (3.2 versus 1.8 hours, respectively), decreased intraoperative blood loss (67.9 cc versus 40.3 cc, respectively), and resulted in less removal of normal parotid tissue (volume of normal parotid tissue removed in excess of tumor: 23.0 cc versus 6.0 cc, respectively). No significant difference in surgical margin status was noted between anterograde and retrograde parotidectomy (P = 0.452). In appropriately selected cases, compared with standard anterograde parotidectomy, retrograde parotidectomy is more efficient and spares normal parotid tissue without compromising surgical margins. Facial nerve monitoring provides a useful adjunct for retrograde dissection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Iran J Otorhinolaryngol
                Iran J Otorhinolaryngol
                IJO
                Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
                Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Mashhad, Iran )
                2251-7251
                2251-726X
                March 2022
                : 34
                : 121
                : 83-88
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
                [2 ] Sinus and Surgical Endoscopic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
                [3 ] Otorhinolaryngologist , Mashhad, Iran.
                [4 ] Department of Anesthesiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran .
                [5 ] Nuclear Medicine Physician, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author: Sinus and Surgical Endoscopic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. E-mail: rasoulianb@mums.ac.ir
                Article
                10.22038/IJORL.2022.51069.2717
                9119333
                d23ebaae-3216-466f-9bdd-4421b8f4d4ab

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 November 2020
                : 23 January 2022
                Categories
                Original Article

                aantegrade dissection,facial nerve,parotid mass,retrograde dissection

                Comments

                Comment on this article