12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Body Odor Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Moral Harshness Toward Moral Violations of Purity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Detecting pathogen threats and avoiding disease is fundamental to human survival. The behavioral immune system (BIS) framework outlines a set of psychological functions that may have evolved for this purpose. Disgust is a core emotion that plays a pivotal role in the BIS, as it activates the behavioral avoidance motives that prevent people from being in contact with pathogens. To date, there has been little agreement on how disgust sensitivity might underlie moral judgments. Here, we investigated moral violations of “purity” (assumed to elicit disgust) and violations of “harm” (assumed to elicit anger). We hypothesized that individual differences in BIS-related traits would be associated with greater disgust (vs. anger) reactivity to, and greater condemnation of Purity (vs. Harm) violations. The study was pre-registered ( https://osf.io/57nm8/). Participants ( N = 632) rated scenarios concerning moral wrongness or inappropriateness and regarding disgust and anger. To measure individual differences in the activation of the BIS, we used our recently developed Body Odor Disgust Scale (BODS), a BIS-related trait measure that assesses individual differences in feeling disgusted by body odors. In line with our predictions, we found that scores on the BODS relate more strongly to affective reactions to Purity, as compared to Harm, violations. In addition, BODS relates more strongly to Moral condemnation than to perceived Inappropriateness of an action, and to the condemnation of Purity violations as compared to Harm violations. These results suggest that the BIS is involved in moral judgment, although to some extent this role seems to be specific for violations of “moral purity,” a response that might be rooted in disease avoidance. Data and scripts to analyze the data are available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository: https://osf.io/tk4x5/. Planned analyses are available at https://osf.io/x6g3u/.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Microbes, mating, and morality: individual differences in three functional domains of disgust.

            What is the function of disgust? Whereas traditional models have suggested that disgust serves to protect the self or neutralize reminders of our animal nature, an evolutionary perspective suggests that disgust functions to solve 3 qualitatively different adaptive problems related to pathogen avoidance, mate choice, and social interaction. The authors investigated this 3-domain model of disgust across 4 studies and examined how sensitivity to these functional domains relates to individual differences in other psychological constructs. Consistent with their predictions, factor analyses demonstrated that disgust sensitivity partitions into domains related to pathogens, sexuality, and morality. Further, sensitivity to the 3 domains showed predictable differentiation based on sex, perceived vulnerability to disease, psychopathic tendencies, and Big 5 personality traits. In exploring these 3 domains of disgust, the authors introduce a new measure of disgust sensitivity. Appreciation of the functional heterogeneity of disgust has important implications for research on individual differences in disgust sensitivity, emotion, clinical impairments, and neuroscience. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Disgust: evolved function and structure.

              Interest in and research on disgust has surged over the past few decades. The field, however, still lacks a coherent theoretical framework for understanding the evolved function or functions of disgust. Here we present such a framework, emphasizing 2 levels of analysis: that of evolved function and that of information processing. Although there is widespread agreement that disgust evolved to motivate the avoidance of contact with disease-causing organisms, there is no consensus about the functions disgust serves when evoked by acts unrelated to pathogen avoidance. Here we suggest that in addition to motivating pathogen avoidance, disgust evolved to regulate decisions in the domains of mate choice and morality. For each proposed evolved function, we posit distinct information processing systems that integrate function-relevant information and account for the trade-offs required of each disgust system. By refocusing the discussion of disgust on computational mechanisms, we recast prior theorizing on disgust into a framework that can generate new lines of empirical and theoretical inquiry.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                05 March 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 458
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi Magna Græcia di Catanzaro , Catanzaro, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, Stockholm University , Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes

                Edited by: Tsunehiko Tanaka, Niigata University, Japan

                Reviewed by: Karlijn Massar, Maastricht University, Netherlands; Yoshinori Sugiura, Hiroshima University, Japan

                *Correspondence: Torun Lindholm, tlm@ 123456psychology.su.se

                This article was submitted to Evolutionary Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00458
                6412480
                30890987
                d240ebd7-c5e1-4c1f-ae0c-565358a3428f
                Copyright © 2019 Liuzza, Olofsson, Cancino-Montecinos and Lindholm.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 October 2018
                : 15 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 68, Pages: 14, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Vetenskapsrådet 10.13039/501100004359
                Award ID: 2016-02018
                Funded by: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond 10.13039/501100004472
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                moral judgment,disgust,purity,behavioral immune system,body odors
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                moral judgment, disgust, purity, behavioral immune system, body odors

                Comments

                Comment on this article