8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The unfolded protein response in amyotrophic later sclerosis: results of a phase 2 trial

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 1 , 32
      Brain
      Oxford University Press
      amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, unfolded protein response, guanabenz

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Strong evidence suggests that endoplasmic reticulum stress plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) through altered regulation of proteostasis. Robust preclinical findings demonstrated that guanabenz selectively inhibits endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced eIF2α-phosphatase, allowing misfolded protein clearance, reduces neuronal death and prolongs survival in in vitro and in vivo models. However, its safety and efficacy in patients with ALS are unknown.

          To address these issues, we conducted a multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial with a futility design. Patients with ALS who had displayed an onset of symptoms within the previous 18 months were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive 64 mg, 32 mg or 16 mg of guanabenz or placebo daily for 6 months as an add-on therapy to riluzole. The purpose of the placebo group blinding was to determine safety but not efficacy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients progressing to higher stages of disease within 6 months as measured using the ALS Milano-Torino staging system, compared with a historical cohort of 200 patients with ALS. The secondary outcomes were the rate of decline in the total revised ALS functional rating scale score, slow vital capacity change, time to death, tracheotomy or permanent ventilation and serum light neurofilament level at 6 months.

          The primary assessment of efficacy was performed using intention-to-treat analysis. The treatment arms using 64 mg and 32 mg guanabenz, both alone and combined, reached the primary hypothesis of non-futility, with the proportions of patients who progressed to higher stages of disease at 6 months being significantly lower than that expected under the hypothesis of non-futility and a significantly lower difference in the median rate of change in the total revised ALS functional rating scale score.

          This effect was driven by patients with bulbar onset, none of whom (0/18) progressed to a higher stage of disease at 6 months compared with those on 16 mg guanabenz (4/8; 50%), the historical cohort alone (21/49; 43%; P = 0.001) or plus placebo (25/60; 42%; P = 0.001). The proportion of patients who experienced at least one adverse event was higher in any guanabenz arm than in the placebo arm, with higher dosing arms having a significantly higher proportion of drug-related side effects and the 64 mg arm a significantly higher drop-out rate. The number of serious adverse events did not significantly differ between the guanabenz arms and the placebo. Our findings indicate that a larger trial with a molecule targeting the unfolded protein response pathway without the alpha-2 adrenergic related side-effect profile of guanabenz is warranted.

          Abstract

          ER stress plays a key role in ALS pathogenesis through altered regulation of proteostasis. In a phase 2 futility trial, Dalla Bella et al. show that the alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist guanabenz reduces the proportion of patients progressing to higher stages of disease at 6 months compared to historical controls.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation.

          The vast majority of proteins that a cell secretes or displays on its surface first enter the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where they fold and assemble. Only properly assembled proteins advance from the ER to the cell surface. To ascertain fidelity in protein folding, cells regulate the protein-folding capacity in the ER according to need. The ER responds to the burden of unfolded proteins in its lumen (ER stress) by activating intracellular signal transduction pathways, collectively termed the unfolded protein response (UPR). Together, at least three mechanistically distinct branches of the UPR regulate the expression of numerous genes that maintain homeostasis in the ER or induce apoptosis if ER stress remains unmitigated. Recent advances shed light on mechanistic complexities and on the role of the UPR in numerous diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The integrated stress response: From mechanism to disease

              Protein quality control is essential for the proper function of cells and the organisms that they make up. The resulting loss of proteostasis, the processes by which the health of the cell’s proteins is monitored and maintained at homeostasis, is associated with a wide range of age-related human diseases. Here, we highlight how the integrated stress response (ISR), a central signaling network that responds to proteostasis defects by tuning protein synthesis rates, impedes the formation of long-term memory. In addition, we address how dysregulated ISR signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of complex diseases, including cognitive disorders, neurodegeneration, cancer, diabetes, and metabolic disorders. The development of tools through which the ISR can be modulated promises to uncover new avenues to diminish pathologies resulting from it for clinical benefit.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain
                Brain
                brainj
                Brain
                Oxford University Press
                0006-8950
                1460-2156
                September 2021
                27 April 2021
                27 April 2021
                : 144
                : 9
                : 2635-2647
                Affiliations
                [1 ] 3rd Neurology Unit and Motor Neuron Disease Centre, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico “Carlo Besta” , Milan 20133, Italy
                [2 ] NESMOS Department, Neuromuscolar Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital and University of Rome “Sapienza” , Rome 00189, Italy
                [3 ] Neurologic Unit, Monserrato University Hospital , Cagliari 09042, Italy
                [4 ] Neurologic Clinic, SS. Annunziata Hospital , Chieti 66100, Italy
                [5 ] San Martino Polyclinic Hospital , Genoa 16132, Italy
                [6 ] ALS Centre “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin , Turin, Italy
                [7 ] Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza , Turin, Italy
                [8 ] Department of Neurorehabilitaton, Casa Cura Policlinico , Milan, Italy
                [9 ] Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia and NeMO-Brescia Clinical Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases , Brescia, Italy
                [10 ] Department of Medical and Surgery Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Siena , Siena, Italy
                [11 ] ALS Research Centre, BioNeC, University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy
                [12 ] NEuroMuscular Omnicentre of Milan , Milan, Italy
                [13 ] Department of Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena , Modena, Italy
                [14 ] Unit of Neurology and Neuromuscular Disorders, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and University of Messina, AOU Policlinico “G. Martino” , Messina, Italy
                [15 ] NEuroMuscular Omnicentre of Messina, University Hospital “G. Martino” , Messina, Italy
                [16 ] “Luigi Vanvitelli” Campania University Naples , Napoli, Italy
                [17 ] ICS Maugeri IRCCS , Milan, Italy
                [18 ] Department of Neurology IRCCS “San Raffaele” Hospital , Milan, Italy
                [19 ] Neurology Unit, Department of Neuro-Motor Diseases, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale, IRCCS of Reggio Emilia , Reggio Emilia, Italy
                [20 ] Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Neurology Unit, University of Pisa , Pisa, Italy
                [21 ] Department of Neurology-Stroke Unit and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS , Milan, Italy
                [22 ] Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, “Dino Ferrari” Centre and Centre for Neurotechnology and Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan , Milan, Italy
                [23 ] Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Bari , Italy
                [24 ] Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua , Italy
                [25 ] Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Division of Neurology, University Hospital of Ferrara , Ferrara, Italy
                [26 ] Neurology Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital , Udine, Italy
                [27 ] Intensive Neurorehabilitation Unit, ICS Maugeri IRCCS , Mistretta, Italy
                [28 ] Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute , Milan, Italy
                [29 ] Drew University, Caspersen School of Graduate Studies , Madison, NJ, USA
                [30 ] InFlectis BioScience, Nantes , France
                [31 ] Scientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico “Carlo Besta” , Milan, Italy
                [32 ] Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “Luigi Sacco”, University of Milan , Milan, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Giuseppe Lauria Department of Clinical Neurosciences, IRCCS Foundation “Carlo Besta” Neurological Institute and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “Luigi Sacco”, University of Milan, Milan 20133, Italy E-mail: giuseppe.lauriapinter@ 123456istituto-besta.it
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-7512
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8910-3131
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4788-1875
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-9517
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-0304
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-020X
                Article
                awab167
                10.1093/brain/awab167
                8557337
                33905493
                d2e034aa-3c0a-43f8-9b52-e515f3ed04ad
                © The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 28 November 2020
                : 26 March 2021
                : 16 April 2021
                : 19 October 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Funding
                Funded by: Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la Sclerosi Laterale Amiotrofica, DOI 10.13039/501100007802;
                Award ID: FGCR 01/2013
                Award ID: 2014–005367-32
                Funded by: Ricerca Corrente of the Ministry of Health to the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico “Carlo Besta” of Milan;
                Categories
                Clinical Trial
                AcademicSubjects/MED00310
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01870

                Neurosciences
                amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,unfolded protein response,guanabenz
                Neurosciences
                amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, unfolded protein response, guanabenz

                Comments

                Comment on this article