11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Unraveling Synaptic GCaMP Signals: Differential Excitability and Clearance Mechanisms Underlying Distinct Ca 2+ Dynamics in Tonic and Phasic Excitatory, and Aminergic Modulatory Motor Terminals in Drosophila

      research-article
      ,
      eNeuro
      Society for Neuroscience
      ion channels, mitochondria, octopamine, PMCA, residual calcium, synaptic plasticity

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          GCaMP is an optogenetic Ca 2+ sensor widely used for monitoring neuronal activities but the precise physiological implications of GCaMP signals remain to be further delineated among functionally distinct synapses. The Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ), a powerful genetic system for studying synaptic function and plasticity, consists of tonic and phasic glutamatergic and modulatory aminergic motor terminals of distinct properties. We report a first simultaneous imaging and electric recording study to directly contrast the frequency characteristics of GCaMP signals of the three synapses for physiological implications. Different GCaMP variants were applied in genetic and pharmacological perturbation experiments to examine the Ca 2+ influx and clearance processes underlying the GCaMP signal. Distinct mutational and drug effects on GCaMP signals indicate differential roles of Na + and K + channels, encoded by genes including paralytic ( para), Shaker ( Sh), Shab, and ether-a-go-go ( eag), in excitability control of different motor terminals. Moreover, the Ca 2+ handling properties reflected by the characteristic frequency dependence of the synaptic GCaMP signals were determined to a large extent by differential capacity of mitochondria-powered Ca 2+ clearance mechanisms. Simultaneous focal recordings of synaptic activities further revealed that GCaMPs were ineffective in tracking the rapid dynamics of Ca 2+ influx that triggers transmitter release, especially during low-frequency activities, but more adequately reflected cytosolic residual Ca 2+ accumulation, a major factor governing activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. These results highlight the vast range of GCaMP response patterns in functionally distinct synaptic types and provide relevant information for establishing basic guidelines for the physiological interpretations of presynaptic GCaMP signals from in situ imaging studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references129

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Short-term synaptic plasticity.

          Synaptic transmission is a dynamic process. Postsynaptic responses wax and wane as presynaptic activity evolves. This prominent characteristic of chemical synaptic transmission is a crucial determinant of the response properties of synapses and, in turn, of the stimulus properties selected by neural networks and of the patterns of activity generated by those networks. This review focuses on synaptic changes that result from prior activity in the synapse under study, and is restricted to short-term effects that last for at most a few minutes. Forms of synaptic enhancement, such as facilitation, augmentation, and post-tetanic potentiation, are usually attributed to effects of a residual elevation in presynaptic [Ca(2+)]i, acting on one or more molecular targets that appear to be distinct from the secretory trigger responsible for fast exocytosis and phasic release of transmitter to single action potentials. We discuss the evidence for this hypothesis, and the origins of the different kinetic phases of synaptic enhancement, as well as the interpretation of statistical changes in transmitter release and roles played by other factors such as alterations in presynaptic Ca(2+) influx or postsynaptic levels of [Ca(2+)]i. Synaptic depression dominates enhancement at many synapses. Depression is usually attributed to depletion of some pool of readily releasable vesicles, and various forms of the depletion model are discussed. Depression can also arise from feedback activation of presynaptic receptors and from postsynaptic processes such as receptor desensitization. In addition, glial-neuronal interactions can contribute to short-term synaptic plasticity. Finally, we summarize the recent literature on putative molecular players in synaptic plasticity and the effects of genetic manipulations and other modulatory influences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Membrane fusion: grappling with SNARE and SM proteins.

            The two universally required components of the intracellular membrane fusion machinery, SNARE and SM (Sec1/Munc18-like) proteins, play complementary roles in fusion. Vesicular and target membrane-localized SNARE proteins zipper up into an alpha-helical bundle that pulls the two membranes tightly together to exert the force required for fusion. SM proteins, shaped like clasps, bind to trans-SNARE complexes to direct their fusogenic action. Individual fusion reactions are executed by distinct combinations of SNARE and SM proteins to ensure specificity, and are controlled by regulators that embed the SM-SNARE fusion machinery into a physiological context. This regulation is spectacularly apparent in the exquisite speed and precision of synaptic exocytosis, where synaptotagmin (the calcium-ion sensor for fusion) cooperates with complexin (the clamp activator) to control the precisely timed release of neurotransmitters that initiates synaptic transmission and underlies brain function.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Optimization of a GCaMP calcium indicator for neural activity imaging.

              Genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) are powerful tools for systems neuroscience. Recent efforts in protein engineering have significantly increased the performance of GECIs. The state-of-the art single-wavelength GECI, GCaMP3, has been deployed in a number of model organisms and can reliably detect three or more action potentials in short bursts in several systems in vivo. Through protein structure determination, targeted mutagenesis, high-throughput screening, and a battery of in vitro assays, we have increased the dynamic range of GCaMP3 by severalfold, creating a family of "GCaMP5" sensors. We tested GCaMP5s in several systems: cultured neurons and astrocytes, mouse retina, and in vivo in Caenorhabditis chemosensory neurons, Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction and adult antennal lobe, zebrafish retina and tectum, and mouse visual cortex. Signal-to-noise ratio was improved by at least 2- to 3-fold. In the visual cortex, two GCaMP5 variants detected twice as many visual stimulus-responsive cells as GCaMP3. By combining in vivo imaging with electrophysiology we show that GCaMP5 fluorescence provides a more reliable measure of neuronal activity than its predecessor GCaMP3. GCaMP5 allows more sensitive detection of neural activity in vivo and may find widespread applications for cellular imaging in general.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                eneuro
                eneuro
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                Society for Neuroscience
                2373-2822
                8 February 2018
                19 February 2018
                Jan-Feb 2018
                : 5
                : 1
                : ENEURO.0362-17.2018
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Biology, University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA 52242
                Author notes

                The authors declare no competing financial interests.

                Author contributions: X.X. and C.-F.W. designed research; X.X. performed research; X.X. and C.-F.W. analyzed data; X.X. and C.-F.W. wrote the paper.

                This work was supported by Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health Grants GM88804, AG047612, and AG051513.

                Correspondence should be addressed to either of the following: Dr. Chun-Fang Wu, Department of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, E-mail: chun-fang-wu@ 123456uiowa.edu ; or Xiaomin Xing, Department of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, E-mail: xiaomin-xing@ 123456uiowa.edu .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4973-2021
                Article
                eN-NWR-0362-17
                10.1523/ENEURO.0362-17.2018
                5818553
                29464198
                d3033a14-49b5-4163-9b17-29ceb2507cc7
                Copyright © 2018 Xing and Wu

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 13 October 2017
                : 27 January 2018
                : 2 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 16, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 137, Pages: 28, Words: 19834
                Funding
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000002HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
                Award ID: GM88804
                Award ID: GM80255
                Award ID: AG047612
                Award ID: AG051513
                Categories
                6
                6.1
                New Research
                Neuronal Excitability
                Custom metadata
                January/February 2018

                ion channels,mitochondria,octopamine,pmca,residual calcium,synaptic plasticity

                Comments

                Comment on this article