Improved GBS-YOLOv5 algorithm based on YOLOv5 applied to UAV intelligent traffic

Abstract

As the road traffic situation becomes complex, the task of traffic management takes on an increasingly heavy load. The air-to-ground traffic administration network of drones has become an important tool to promote the high quality of traffic police work in many places. Drones can be used instead of a large number of human beings to perform daily tasks, as: traffic offense detection, daily crowd detection, etc. Drones are aerial operations and shoot small targets. So the detection accuracy of drones is less. To address the problem of low accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in detecting small targets, we designed a more suitable algorithm for UAV detection and called GBS-YOLOv5. It was an improvement on the original YOLOv5 model. Firstly, in the default model, there was a problem of serious loss of small target information and insufficient utilization of shallow feature information as the depth of the feature extraction network deepened. We designed the efficient spatio-temporal interaction module to replace the residual network structure in the original network. The role of this module was to increase the network depth for feature extraction. Then, we added the spatial pyramid convolution module on top of YOLOv5. Its function was to mine small target information and act as a detection head for small size targets. Finally, to better preserve the detailed information of small targets in the shallow features, we proposed the shallow bottleneck. And the introduction of recursive gated convolution in the feature fusion section enabled better interaction of higher-order spatial semantic information. The GBS-YOLOv5 algorithm conducted experiments showing that the value of mAP@0.5 was 35.3 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\%$$\end{document} and the mAP@0.5:0.95 was 20.0 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\%$$\end{document} . Compared to the default YOLOv5 algorithm was boosted by 4.0 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\%$$\end{document} and 3.5 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\%$$\end{document} , respectively.