2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Responses of soil nitrogen and phosphorus cycling to drying and rewetting cycles: A meta-analysis

      , , , , ,
      Soil Biology and Biochemistry
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references116

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          THE META-ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century.

              By comparing the ozone depletion potential-weighted anthropogenic emissions of N2O with those of other ozone-depleting substances, we show that N2O emission currently is the single most important ozone-depleting emission and is expected to remain the largest throughout the 21st century. N2O is unregulated by the Montreal Protocol. Limiting future N2O emissions would enhance the recovery of the ozone layer from its depleted state and would also reduce the anthropogenic forcing of the climate system, representing a win-win for both ozone and climate.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Soil Biology and Biochemistry
                Soil Biology and Biochemistry
                Elsevier BV
                00380717
                September 2020
                September 2020
                : 148
                : 107896
                Article
                10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107896
                d37b93e4-ee7d-4cd1-8a94-b982f1b17bec
                © 2020

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article