11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Indications requiring preoperative magnetic resonance imaging before knee arthroscopy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Knee arthroscopy knee is gold standard in diagnosis and simultaneous treatment of knee disorders. But most patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before arthroscopy, although MRI results are not always consistent with arthroscopic findings. This raises the question in which suspected diagnoses MRI really has influence on diagnosis and consecutive surgical therapy.

          Material and methods

          Preoperative MRI of 330 patients with knee disorders were compared with arthroscopic findings. The MRI were performed by 23 radiologists without specialization in musculoskeletal diagnostics. Specificity, sensitivity, negative/positive predictive value and accuracy of MRI were calculated in comparison to arthroscopic findings.

          Results

          We found sensitivity/specificity of 58%/93% for anterior horn, 94%/46% for posterior horn of medial meniscus and 71%/81% for anterior and 62%/82% for posterior horn of lateral meniscus. Related to anterior cruciate ligament injuries we showed sensitivity/specificity of 82%/91% for grade 0 + I and 72%/96% for grade II + III. For Cartilage damage sensitivity/specificity of 98%/7% for grade I-, 89%/29% for grade II-, 96%/38% for grade III- and 96%/69% for grade IV-lesions were revealed.

          Conclusions

          The MRI should not be used as routine diagnostic tool for knee pain. No relevant information for meniscal lesions and anterior cruciate ligament ruptures has been gained with MRI from non-specialized outside imaging centres.

          The MRI should not be used as routine diagnostic tool for knee pain. No relevant information for meniscal lesions and anterior cruciate ligament ruptures has been gained with MRI from non-specialized outside imaging centres.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The etiology of chondromalacia patellae.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review.

            Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of great aid in the diagnosis of knee lesions. Most diagnostic studies comparing MRI and arthroscopy have shown good diagnostic performance in detecting lesions of the menisci and cruciate ligaments. Nevertheless, arthroscopy has remained the reference standard for the diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee, against which alternative diagnostic modalities should be compared. We took arthroscopy to be the 'gold standard', and we undertook a systematic review of MRI and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee. We used Coleman scoring methodology to identify scientifically sound articles in a reproducible format. MRI is highly accurate in diagnosing meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. It is the most appropriate screening tool before therapeutic arthroscopy. It is preferable to diagnostic arthroscopy in most patients because it avoids the surgical risks of arthroscopy. The results of MRI differ for medial and lateral meniscus and ACL, with only 85% accuracy. Study design characteristics should also be taken into account whenever a study on MRI assessing its diagnostic performance is designed or reviewed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Knee chondral lesions: incidence and correlation between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance findings.

              To determine the incidence and morphologic characteristics of knee chondral lesions found at arthroscopy and their correlation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This is a prospective study on 190 consecutive knee arthroscopic procedures performed between March 2003 and February 2004 by the same surgical team. The study group's age average was 34.8 years (14 to 77 years). The indication for surgery included anterior cruciate ligament tears, meniscal tears, and anterior knee pain. Patients without a preoperative MRI study were excluded. MRI reports were performed by qualified radiologists in all the cases. Chondral lesions were classified according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification and were included in a database along with the MRI reports. The results were analyzed statistically with analysis of variance, Pearson, kappa, and chi-square tests. One hundred fifteen chondral lesions in 82 patients were found during the arthroscopic procedure. Most of them were single lesions (72%) located on the medial femoral condyle (32.2%) or medial patellae (22.6%); 62.6% of the lesions were classified as ICRS type 2 or 3-A, with an average surface of 1.99 cm2. We found a significant direct correlation between the patient's age and the size of the lesion (P = .001). MRI sensitivity was 45% with a specificity of 100%. The sensitivity increased with deeper lesions (direct relation with the ICRS classification). Our results showed a statistical power of 100%. Although unenhanced MRI using a 1.5-Tesla magnet with conventional sequences (proton density-weighted, T1-weighted, and T2-weighted) is most accurate at revealing deeper lesions and defects at the patellae, our study shows that a considerable number of lesions will remain undetected until arthroscopy, which remains the gold standard. Level III, diagnostic study of nonconsecutive patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arch Med Sci
                Arch Med Sci
                AMS
                Archives of Medical Science : AMS
                Termedia Publishing House
                1734-1922
                1896-9151
                22 December 2014
                22 December 2014
                : 10
                : 6
                : 1147-1152
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Munich, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. med. Peter E. Müller, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. Phone: +49 89 4400 73781, Fax: +49 89 4400 76780. E-mail: Peter.Mueller@ 123456med.uni-muenchen.de
                Article
                24190
                10.5114/aoms.2014.47825
                4296071
                25624852
                d3d9f50d-1459-46ef-8f5a-71626f9f1896
                Copyright © 2014 Termedia & Banach

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 29 April 2013
                : 25 May 2013
                : 15 June 2013
                Categories
                Clinical Research

                Medicine
                magnetic resonance imaging,arthroscopy,knee,specificity,sensitivity,diagnostic tool
                Medicine
                magnetic resonance imaging, arthroscopy, knee, specificity, sensitivity, diagnostic tool

                Comments

                Comment on this article