2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Monoallelic pathogenic IFT140 variants are a common cause of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease–spectrum phenotype

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited kidney disorder, characterized by development and enlargement of kidney cysts, eventually leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Pathogenic variants in the PKD1 and PKD2 genes are the major cause of ADPKD; additional rare variants in the GANAB, DNAJB11, ALG5 and ALG9 genes have been found in a minority of ADPKD patients. More recently, a significant number of ADPKD families have been linked to monoallelic variants in the IFT140 gene.

          Methods

          In this retrospective study, we tested the prevalence of the known causative genes of ADPKD-spectrum phenotype, including the PKD1, PKD2, GANAB, DNAJB11, ALG5, ALG and IFT140 genes, in a cohort of 129 ADPKD patients who consecutively underwent genetic testing in a single centre in Italy. Genetic testing utilized a combination of targeted next-generation sequencing, long-range polymerase chain reaction, Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Clinical evaluation was conducted through renal function testing and imaging features, including ultrasonography, computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

          Results

          Of the 129 enrolled patients, 86 (66.7%) had pathogenic variants in PKD1 and 28 (21.7%) in PKD2, loss of function pathogenic variants in the IFT140 gene were found in 3 unrelated patients (2.3%), no pathogenic variants were found in other ADPKD genes and 12 patients (9.3%) remained genetically unresolved (ADPKD-GUR). Familial clinical and genetic screening of the index patients with ADPKD due to an IFT140 pathogenic variant (ADPKD- IFT140) allowed identification of eight additional affected relatives. In the 11 ADPKD- IFT140 patients, the renal phenotype was characterized by mild and late-onset PKD, with large renal cysts and limited kidney insufficiency. Extrarenal manifestations, including liver cysts, were rarely seen.

          Conclusion

          Our data suggest the monoallelic pathogenic IFT140 variants are the third most common cause of the ADPKD-spectrum phenotype in Italy, usually associated with a mild and atypical renal cystic disease.

          Graphical Abstract

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology

          The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously developed guidance for the interpretation of sequence variants. 1 In the past decade, sequencing technology has evolved rapidly with the advent of high-throughput next generation sequencing. By adopting and leveraging next generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are now performing an ever increasing catalogue of genetic testing spanning genotyping, single genes, gene panels, exomes, genomes, transcriptomes and epigenetic assays for genetic disorders. By virtue of increased complexity, this paradigm shift in genetic testing has been accompanied by new challenges in sequence interpretation. In this context, the ACMG convened a workgroup in 2013 comprised of representatives from the ACMG, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) to revisit and revise the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. The group consisted of clinical laboratory directors and clinicians. This report represents expert opinion of the workgroup with input from ACMG, AMP and CAP stakeholders. These recommendations primarily apply to the breadth of genetic tests used in clinical laboratories including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes and genomes. This report recommends the use of specific standard terminology: ‘pathogenic’, ‘likely pathogenic’, ‘uncertain significance’, ‘likely benign’, and ‘benign’ to describe variants identified in Mendelian disorders. Moreover, this recommendation describes a process for classification of variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g. population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data, etc.). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a CLIA-approved laboratory with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or equivalent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

            Equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are routinely used to assess kidney function. Current equations have limited precision and systematically underestimate measured GFR at higher values. To develop a new estimating equation for GFR: the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Cross-sectional analysis with separate pooled data sets for equation development and validation and a representative sample of the U.S. population for prevalence estimates. Research studies and clinical populations ("studies") with measured GFR and NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), 1999 to 2006. 8254 participants in 10 studies (equation development data set) and 3896 participants in 16 studies (validation data set). Prevalence estimates were based on 16,032 participants in NHANES. GFR, measured as the clearance of exogenous filtration markers (iothalamate in the development data set; iothalamate and other markers in the validation data set), and linear regression to estimate the logarithm of measured GFR from standardized creatinine levels, sex, race, and age. In the validation data set, the CKD-EPI equation performed better than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation, especially at higher GFR (P < 0.001 for all subsequent comparisons), with less bias (median difference between measured and estimated GFR, 2.5 vs. 5.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), improved precision (interquartile range [IQR] of the differences, 16.6 vs. 18.3 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), and greater accuracy (percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of measured GFR, 84.1% vs. 80.6%). In NHANES, the median estimated GFR was 94.5 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (IQR, 79.7 to 108.1) vs. 85.0 (IQR, 72.9 to 98.5) mL/min per 1.73 m(2), and the prevalence of chronic kidney disease was 11.5% (95% CI, 10.6% to 12.4%) versus 13.1% (CI, 12.1% to 14.0%). The sample contained a limited number of elderly people and racial and ethnic minorities with measured GFR. The CKD-EPI creatinine equation is more accurate than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation and could replace it for routine clinical use. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Unified criteria for ultrasonographic diagnosis of ADPKD.

              Individuals who are at risk for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease are often screened by ultrasound using diagnostic criteria derived from individuals with mutations in PKD1. Families with mutations in PKD2 typically have less severe disease, suggesting a potential need for different diagnostic criteria. In this study, 577 and 371 at-risk individuals from 58 PKD1 and 39 PKD2 families, respectively, were assessed by renal ultrasound and molecular genotyping. Using sensitivity data derived from genetically affected individuals and specificity data derived from genetically unaffected individuals, various diagnostic criteria were compared. In addition, data sets were created to simulate the PKD1 and PKD2 case mix expected in practice to evaluate the performance of diagnostic criteria for families of unknown genotype. The diagnostic criteria currently in use performed suboptimally for individuals with mutations in PKD2 as a result of reduced test sensitivity. In families of unknown genotype, the presence of three or more (unilateral or bilateral) renal cysts is sufficient for establishing the diagnosis in individuals aged 15 to 39 y, two or more cysts in each kidney is sufficient for individuals aged 40 to 59 y, and four or more cysts in each kidney is required for individuals > or = 60 yr. Conversely, fewer than two renal cysts in at-risk individuals aged > or = 40 yr is sufficient to exclude the disease. These unified diagnostic criteria will be useful for testing individuals who are at risk for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in the usual clinical setting in which molecular genotyping is seldom performed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Clin Kidney J
                Clin Kidney J
                ckj
                Clinical Kidney Journal
                Oxford University Press
                2048-8505
                2048-8513
                February 2024
                15 February 2024
                15 February 2024
                : 17
                : 2
                : sfae026
                Affiliations
                Clinical Genetics Unit, Maternal-Infantile Department, ASST Spedali Civili , Brescia, Italy
                Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
                Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
                Medical Genetics Laboratory , ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
                Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
                Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
                Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
                Medical Genetics Laboratory , ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
                Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
                Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia and ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
                Clinical Genetics Unit, Maternal-Infantile Department, ASST Spedali Civili , Brescia, Italy
                Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Claudia Izzi; E-mail: claudia.izzi@ 123456unibs.it
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2759-4027
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-5709
                Article
                sfae026
                10.1093/ckj/sfae026
                10894029
                38404363
                d3e92731-36f0-4155-8b70-d9cd7e2385ae
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com

                History
                : 08 November 2023
                : 24 February 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Categories
                Original Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00340

                Nephrology
                adpkd,genetic kidney disease,ift140,kidney cysts,polycystic kidney disease
                Nephrology
                adpkd, genetic kidney disease, ift140, kidney cysts, polycystic kidney disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article