4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Physician-patient communication of costs and financial burden of cancer and its treatment: a systematic review of clinical guidelines

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Optimising the care of individuals with cancer without imposing significant financial burden related to their anticancer treatment is becoming increasingly difficult. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has recommended clinicians discuss costs of cancer care with patients to enhance shared decision-making. We sought information to guide oncologists’ discussions with patients about these costs.

          Methods

          We searched Medline, EMBASE and clinical practice guideline databases from January 2009 to 1 June 2019 for recommendations about discussing the costs of care and financial burden. Guideline quality was assessed with the AGREE-II instrument.

          Results

          Twenty-seven guidelines met our eligibility criteria, including 16 from ASCO (59%). 21 of 27 (78%) guidelines included recommendations about discussion or consideration of treatment costs when prescribing, with information about actual costs in four (15%). Recognition of the risk of financial burden or financial toxicity was described in 81% (22/27) of guidelines. However, only nine guidelines (33%) included information about managing the financial burden.

          Conclusions

          Current clinical practice guidelines have little information to guide physician-patient discussions about costs of anticancer treatment and management of financial burden. This limits patients’ ability to control costs of treatment, and for the healthcare team to reduce the incidence and severity of financial burden. Current guidelines recommend clinician awareness of price variability and high costs of treatment. Clinicians are recommended to explore cost concerns and address financial worries, especially in high risk groups. Future guidelines should include advice on facilitating cost transparency discussions, with provision of cost information and resources.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08697-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

          David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fertility Preservation in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update

              Purpose To provide current recommendations about fertility preservation for adults and children with cancer. Methods A systematic review of the literature published from January 2013 to March 2017 was completed using PubMed and the Cochrane Library. An Update Panel reviewed the identified publications. Results There were 61 publications identified and reviewed. None of these publications prompted a significant change in the 2013 recommendations. Recommendations Health care providers should initiate the discussion on the possibility of infertility with patients with cancer treated during their reproductive years or with parents/guardians of children as early as possible. Providers should be prepared to discuss fertility preservation options and/or to refer all potential patients to appropriate reproductive specialists. Although patients may be focused initially on their cancer diagnosis, providers should advise patients regarding potential threats to fertility as early as possible in the treatment process so as to allow for the widest array of options for fertility preservation. The discussion should be documented. Sperm, oocyte, and embryo cryopreservation are considered standard practice and are widely available. There is conflicting evidence to recommend gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) and other means of ovarian suppression for fertility preservation. The Panel recognizes that, when proven fertility preservation methods are not feasible, and in the setting of young women with breast cancer, GnRHa may be offered to patients in the hope of reducing the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced ovarian insufficiency. GnRHa should not be used in place of proven fertility preservation methods. The panel notes that the field of ovarian tissue cryopreservation is advancing quickly and may evolve to become standard therapy in the future. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines .
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                anupriya.agarwal@sydney.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2407
                16 September 2021
                16 September 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 1036
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, , The University of Sydney, ; Camperdown, NSW 2050 Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, ; Camperdown, New South Wales Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.413243.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0453 1183, Nepean Cancer Centre, , Nepean Hospital, ; Kingswood, New South Wales Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.414685.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0392 3935, Concord Cancer Centre, , Concord Repatriation General Hospital, ; Concord, New South Wales Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.419783.0, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, ; Camperdown, New South Wales Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6111-8430
                Article
                8697
                10.1186/s12885-021-08697-5
                8447743
                34530765
                d4a25e40-0995-4f4c-b2fb-a1462b184505
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 4 February 2021
                : 17 August 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Reseearch Council of Australia
                Award ID: APP1168194
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council (AU)
                Award ID: PhD Scholarship
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Sydney Catalyst
                Award ID: Postgraduate Research Supplementary Scholarship
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Melanoma Institute Australia
                Award ID: Postgraduate Research Supplementary Scholarship
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
                Award ID: APP1150989
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: University of Sydney
                Award ID: Sydney Robinson Fellowship
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                systematic review,guidelines,cost discussions,costs of care,cancer costs,financial toxicity,financial burden

                Comments

                Comment on this article