11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The brain and the braincase: a spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The spatial relationships between brain and braincase represent a major topic in surgery and evolutionary neuroanatomy. In paleoneurology, neurocranial landmarks are often used as references for brain areas. In this study, we analyze the variation and covariation of midsagittal brain and skull coordinates in a sample of adult modern humans in order to demonstrate spatial associations between hard and soft tissues. The correlation between parietal lobe size and parietal bone size is very low, and there is a marked individual variation. The distances between lobes and bones are partially influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lobes. The main pattern of morphological variability among individuals, associated with the size of the precuneus, apparently does not influence the position of the neurocranial sutures. Therefore, variations in precuneal size modify the distance between the paracentral lobule and bregma, and between the parietal lobe and lambda. Hence, the relative position of the cranial and cerebral landmarks can change as a function of the parietal dimensions. The slight correlation and covariation among these elements suggests a limited degree of spatial integration between soft and hard tissues. Therefore, although the brain influences the cranial size and shape during morphogenesis, the specific position of the cerebral components is sensitive to multiple effects and local factors, without a strict correspondence with the bone landmarks. This absence of correspondent change between brain and skull boundaries suggests caution when making inferences about the brain areas from the position of the cranial sutures. The fact that spatial relationships between cranial and brain areas may vary according to brain proportions must be considered in paleoneurology, when brain anatomy is inferred from cranial evidence.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Anat
          J. Anat
          joa
          Journal of Anatomy
          John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (Chichester, UK )
          0021-8782
          1469-7580
          September 2015
          21 July 2015
          : 227
          : 3
          : 268-276
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana Burgos, Spain
          [2 ] Keio University Yokohama, Japan
          [3 ] Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid, Spain
          Author notes
          Emiliano Bruner, Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana, Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca 3, 09002 Burgos, Spain. E: emiliano.bruner@ 123456cenieh.es
          Article
          PMC4560561 PMC4560561 4560561
          10.1111/joa.12355
          4560561
          26200138
          d52e4924-62b7-4695-a86d-fe74c3000ce3
          © 2015 Anatomical Society
          History
          : 15 June 2015
          Categories
          Original Articles

          parietal lobes,vault,precuneus,paleoneurology,neuroanatomy,geometric morphometrics

          Comments

          Comment on this article