51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Integrated healthcare delivery is a policy goal of healthcare systems. There is no consensus on how to measure the concept, which makes it difficult to monitor progress.

          Purpose

          To identify the different types of methods used to measure integrated healthcare delivery with emphasis on structural, cultural and process aspects.

          Methods

          Medline/Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WHOLIS, and conventional internet search engines were systematically searched for methods to measure integrated healthcare delivery (published – April 2008).

          Results

          Twenty-four published scientific papers and documents met the inclusion criteria. In the 24 references we identified 24 different measurement methods; however, 5 methods shared theoretical framework. The methods can be categorized according to type of data source: a) questionnaire survey data, b) automated register data, or c) mixed data sources. The variety of concepts measured reflects the significant conceptual diversity within the field, and most methods lack information regarding validity and reliability.

          Conclusion

          Several methods have been developed to measure integrated healthcare delivery; 24 methods are available and some are highly developed. The objective governs the method best used. Criteria for sound measures are suggested and further developments should be based on an explicit conceptual framework and focus on simplifying and validating existing methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions.

          Chronic conditions are increasingly the primary concern of health care systems throughout the world. In response to this challenge, the World Health Organization has joined with the MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation to adapt the Chronic Care Model (CCM) from a global perspective. The resultant effort is the Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions (ICCC) framework which expands community and policy aspects of improving health care for chronic conditions and includes components at the micro (patient and family), meso (health care organisation and community), and macro (policy) levels. The framework provides a flexible but comprehensive base on which to build or redesign health systems in accordance with local resources and demands.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What is 'continuity of care'?

              Continuity of care is concerned with the quality of care over time. There are two important perspectives on this. Traditionally, continuity of care is idealized in the patient's experience of a 'continuous caring relationship' with an identified health care professional. For providers in vertically integrated systems of care, the contrasting ideal is the delivery of a 'seamless service' through integration, coordination and the sharing of information between different providers. As patients' health care needs can now only rarely be met by a single professional, multidimensional models of continuity have had to be developed to accommodate the possibility of achieving both ideals simultaneously. Continuity of care may, therefore, be viewed from the perspective of either patient or provider. Continuity in the experience of care relates conceptually to patients' satisfaction with both the interpersonal aspects of care and the coordination of that care. Experienced continuity may be valued in its own right. In contrast, continuity in the delivery of care cannot be evaluated solely through patients' experiences, and is related to important aspects of services such as 'case-management' and 'multidisciplinary team working'. From a provider perspective, the focus is on new models of service delivery and improved patient outcomes. A full consideration of continuity of care should therefore cover both of these distinct perspectives, exploring how these come together to enhance the patient-centredness of care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Unit of Health Services Research,
                Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 15, Stairway B, Ground floor, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark, E-mail: M.strandberg-larsen@ 123456ifsv.ku.dk
                Role: Professor, Director of the MPH-programme, Unit of Health Services Research,
                Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 15, Stairway B, Ground floor, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark, E-mail: A.krasnik@ 123456ifsv.ku.dk
                Journal
                Int J Integr Care
                IJIC
                International Journal of Integrated Care
                Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving (Utrecht, The Netherlands )
                1568-4156
                Jan-Mar 2009
                04 February 2009
                : 9
                : e01
                Affiliations
                Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 15, Stairway B, Ground floor, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark, E-mail: M.strandberg-larsen@ 123456ifsv.ku.dk
                Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 15, Stairway B, Ground floor, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark, E-mail: A.krasnik@ 123456ifsv.ku.dk
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Martin Strandberg-Larsen, PhD, MScPH, Unit of Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 15, Stairway B, Ground floor, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark, Tel.: +45 35 327980, Fax: +45 35327629, E-mail: M.strandberg-larsen@ 123456ifsv.ku.dk
                Article
                ijic200901
                10.5334/ijic.305
                2663702
                19340325
                d54f3e59-c3cf-4edb-bc14-46382b408e3c
                Copyright 2009, International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC)
                History
                : 31 July 2008
                : 28 November 2008
                : 8 December 2008
                Categories
                Research and Theory

                Health & Social care
                literature review,methods,integrated healthcare delivery,quality of healthcare

                Comments

                Comment on this article