10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin

      research-article
      , PharmD 1 , , PharmD 1 , , PharmD 2
      Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
      SAGE Publications
      anticoagulation, heparin, partial thromboplastin time

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Due to variable pharmacokinetic properties, therapeutic anticoagulation with continuous unfractionated heparin (UFH) requires ongoing laboratory monitoring, generally with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In the ambulatory setting, clinicians who manage warfarin therapy often use time in the therapeutic range (TTR) to estimate a percentage of time the international normalized ratio is therapeutic. We applied the TTR concept to aPTT monitoring for therapeutic UFH and used 2 methodologies for estimation: percentage of aPTT values in range (%aIR) and a modification of the Rosendaal method (mod-Rosendaal). This study included adult inpatients admitted between September 30, 2015, and September 30, 2016, at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. For each patient, all available aPTT values were extracted to calculate 2 individual TTRs according to each methodology. Comparison between methods was performed using Student t test, and correlation was assessed with simple linear regression. A total of 255 patients were included in this study. The major outcome of TTR estimation was significantly higher using mod-Rosendaal (43.7% [26.5%]) versus %aIR (37.7% [25.7%], P = .012) by a mean difference of 6% points (95% confidence interval: 1.3-10.7). Time in the therapeutic range estimated by mod-Rosendaal significantly correlated with those estimated by %aIR ( r = 0.84, P < .001). Further studies should evaluate the correlation between TTR and clinical outcomes and establish a benchmark for quality therapeutic anticoagulation with continuous UFH.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Anticoagulation control and prediction of adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.

          To date, there has been no systematic examination of the relationship between international normalized ratio (INR) control measurements and the prediction of adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane through January 2008 for studies of atrial fibrillation patients receiving vitamin-K antagonists that reported INR control measures (percentage of time in therapeutic range [TTR] and percentage of INRs in range) and major hemorrhage and thromboembolic events. In total, 47 studies were included from 38 published articles. TTR ranged from 29% to 75%; percentage of INRs ranged from 34% to 84%. From studies reporting both measures, TTR significantly correlated with percentage of INRs in range (P<0.001). Randomized controlled trials had better INR control than retrospective studies (64.9% versus 56.4%; P=0.01). TTR negatively correlated with major hemorrhage (r=-0.59; P=0.002) and thromboembolic rates (r=-0.59; P=0.01). This effect was significant in retrospective studies (major hemorrhage, r=-0.78; P=0.006 and thromboembolic rate, r=-0.88; P=0.03) but not in randomized controlled trials (major hemorrhage, r=0.18; P=0.33 and thromboembolic rate, r=-0.61; P=0.07). For retrospective studies, a 6.9% improvement in the TTR significantly reduced major hemorrhage by 1 event per 100 patient-years of treatment (95% CI, 0.29 to 1.71 events). In atrial fibrillation patients receiving orally administered anticoagulation treatment, TTR and percentage of INRs in range effectively predict INR control. Data from retrospective studies support the use of TTR to accurately predict reductions in adverse events.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality assessment of anticoagulation dose management: comparative evaluation of measures of time-in-therapeutic range.

              The results of clinical trials often hinge on the quality of oral anticoagulation management, yet the quality of such management is frequently not mentioned or measured. Time-in-therapeutic range (TTR) is one measure of quality of anticoagulation dose management, but various methodologies exist for measuring TTR. This study was initiated to compare three commonly used methodologies for measuring TTR to see how they compare within the same cohort of patients. Three common methodologies of calculating time-in-therapeutic range were analyzed retrospectively in a cohort of patients over six two-month intervals. Additional analysis was performed for three and six-month intervals. The methodologies included fraction of INRs in range; cross-section of the files; and linear interpolation. Fraction of the INRs in range and cross-section of the files methodologies gave similar results, while linear interpolation yielded significantly shorter time-in-range for the two-month, three-month, and six-month intervals measured. The advantages and disadvantages of each methodology are discussed. The decision of which method to use should be based on clinic size, information desired, and clinic resources for ease of applying either of the methods in clinical practice. Each of these methodologies has their limitations and the question remains as to which method best reflects the quality of anticoagulation management. Regardless of these limitations, investigators are urged to employ at least one method of measuring the quality of oral anticoagulation management so as to better assess the validity of the clinical outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Appl Thromb Hemost
                Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost
                CAT
                spcat
                Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1076-0296
                1938-2723
                13 September 2018
                December 2018
                : 24
                : 9 Suppl
                : 178S-181S
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
                [2 ]School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Clara Ting, Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Email: cting2@ 123456partners.org
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-6717
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-4604
                Article
                10.1177_1076029618798944
                10.1177/1076029618798944
                6714859
                30213200
                d5dd4887-46b4-40b6-b9e8-8b06920c13df
                © The Author(s) 2018

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Original Articles

                anticoagulation,heparin,partial thromboplastin time
                anticoagulation, heparin, partial thromboplastin time

                Comments

                Comment on this article