23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gallbladder adenomyomatosis: imaging findings, tricks and pitfalls

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract

          Gallbladder adenomyomatosis (GA) is a benign alteration of the gallbladder wall that can be found in up to 9% of patients. GA is characterized by a gallbladder wall thickening containing small bile-filled cystic spaces (i.e., the Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses, RAS). The bile contained in RAS may undergo a progressive concentration process leading to crystal precipitation and calcification development. A correct characterization of GA is fundamental in order to avoid unnecessary cholecystectomies. Ultrasound (US) is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing GA; the use of high-frequency probes and a precise focal depth adjustment enable correct identification and characterization of GA in the majority of cases. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be performed if RAS cannot be clearly identified at baseline US: RAS appear avascular at CEUS, independently from their content. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be reserved for cases that are unclear on US and CEUS. At MRI, RAS can be identified with extremely high sensitivity, but their signal intensity varies widely according to their content. Positron emission tomography (PET) may be helpful for excluding malignancy in selected cases. Computed tomography (CT) and cholangiography are not routinely indicated in the suspicion of GA.

          Teaching points

          1. Gallbladder adenomyomatosis is a common benign lesion (1–9% of the patients).

          2. Identification of Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses is crucial for diagnosing gallbladder adenomyomatosis.

          3. Sonography is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing gallbladder adenomyomatosis.

          4. Intravenous contrast material administration increases ultrasound accuracy in diagnosing gallbladder adenomyomatosis.

          5. Magnetic resonance is a problem-solving technique for unclear cases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Relationship between gallbladder carcinoma and the segmental type of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder.

          Specimens from 3197 consecutive and unselected cholecystectomies performed during a 6-year period were studied. Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder was defined as a lesion characterized by a thickened wall that consisted of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses surrounded by proliferated fibromuscular tissue. Adenomyomatosis was found in 279 specimens and classified as one of three types: segmental, fundal, or diffuse. Segmental adenomyomatosis was found in 188 specimens; gallbladder cancer (GBC) developed in 12 (6.4%) of the patients with segmental type adenomyomatosis. GBC developed in the mucosa of the fundal compartment distal to the annular stricture of the segmental type adenomyomatosis in all 12 of these patients. Conversely, GBC developed in 93 (3.1%) of the other 3009 patients (those with fundal alone, diffuse, or no adenomyomatosis). The prevalence of GBC in patients with segmental adenomyomatosis was significantly (P less than 0.025) higher than that of patients without segmental adenomyomatosis. Clinicians should be aware that segmental adenomyomatosis often coexists with GBC.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant gallbladder diseases with real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

            The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differential diagnosis between benign and malignant gallbladder diseases was investigated. Thirty-three patients with gallbladder carcinomas and 47 with benign gallbladder diseases underwent CEUS. The lesion enhancement time, enhancement extent, pattern, dynamic change of enhancement and the intactness of gallbladder wall were evaluated. In the early phase at CEUS, hyper-, iso-, hypo-, and non-enhancement were found in 84.8% (28/33), 9.1% (3/33), 6.1% (2/33), and 0% (0/33) of gallbladder carcinomas, and 70.3% (33/47), 17.0% (8/47), 2.1% (1/47), and 10.6% (5/47) of benign diseases (p > 0.05). Hyper-enhancement or iso-enhancement in the early phase and then fading out to hypo-enhancement within 35 s after contrast agent administration was found in 90.9% (30/33) of carcinomas and 17.0% (8/47) of benign lesions (p < 0.001). Destruction of the gallbladder wall intactness was absent in benign diseases, whereas it was present in 28 (84.8%) of the 33 carcinomas (p < 0.001). Destruction of gallbladder wall intactness on CEUS yielded the highest capability in differential diagnosis, with sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index of 84.8% (28/33), 100% (47/47), and 0.85, respectively. Conventional US made correct original diagnoses in 55 (68.8%) patients, whereas CEUS in 77 (96.3%). Thus, CEUS is useful in differential diagnosis between malignant and benign gallbladder diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              MR Imaging of the Gallbladder: A Pictorial Essay

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +390471908494 , matteobonatti@hotmail.com
                Journal
                Insights Imaging
                Insights Imaging
                Insights into Imaging
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1869-4101
                26 January 2017
                26 January 2017
                April 2017
                : 8
                : 2
                : 243-253
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, Bolzano Central Hospital, 5 Boehler Street, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1763 1124, GRID grid.5611.3, Department of Radiology, , University of Verona, ; 10 LA Scuro Place, 37134 Verona, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Pathology, Bolzano Central Hospital, 5 Boehler Street, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
                Article
                544
                10.1007/s13244-017-0544-7
                5359147
                28127678
                d668ec96-d574-48e8-a248-71ccdd925a97
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 10 November 2016
                : 13 January 2017
                : 17 January 2017
                Categories
                Pictorial Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Radiology & Imaging
                gallbladder,rokitansky–aschoff sinuses of the gallbladder,gallbladder diseases,ultrasonography,magnetic resonance imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article