9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      More that unites us than divides us? A qualitative study of integration of community health and social care services

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The integration of community health and social care services has been widely promoted nationally as a vital step to improve patient centred care, reduce costs, reduce admissions to hospital and facilitate timely and effective discharge from hospital. The complexities of integration raise questions about the practical challenges of integrating health and care given embedded professional and organisational boundaries in both sectors. We describe how an English city created a single, integrated care partnership, to integrate community health and social care services. This led to the development of 12 integrated neighbourhood teams, combining and co-locating professionals across three separate localities. The aim of this research is to identify the context and the factors enabling and hindering integration from a qualitative process evaluation.

          Methods

          Twenty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with equal numbers of health and social care staff at strategic and operational level. The data was subjected to thematic analysis.

          Results

          We describe three key themes: 1) shared vision and leadership; 2) organisational factors; 3) professional workforce factors. We found a clarity of vision and purpose of integration throughout the partnership, but there were challenges related to the introduction of devolved leadership. There were widespread concerns that the specified outcome measures did not capture the complexities of integration. Organisational challenges included a lack of detail around clinical and service delivery planning, tensions around variable human resource practices and barriers to data sharing. A lack of understanding and trust meant professional workforce integration remained a key challenge, although integration was also seen as a potential solution to engender relationship building.

          Conclusions

          Given the long-term national policy focus on integration this ambitious approach to integrate community health and social care has highlighted implications for leadership, organisational design and inter-professional working. Given the ethos of valuing the local assets of individuals and networks within the new partnership we found the integrated neighbourhood teams could all learn from each other. Many of the challenges of integration could benefit from embracing the inherent capabilities across the integrated neighbourhood teams and localities of this city.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews

            Objective To identify, summarise and synthesise available literature on the effectiveness of implementation strategies for optimising implementation of complex interventions in primary care. Design Systematic review of reviews. Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsychINFO were searched, from first publication until December 2013; the bibliographies of relevant articles were screened for additional reports. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Eligible reviews had to (1) examine effectiveness of single or multifaceted implementation strategies, (2) measure health professional practice or process outcomes and (3) include studies from predominantly primary care in developed countries. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text articles of potentially eligible reviews for inclusion. Data synthesis Extracted data were synthesised using a narrative approach. Results 91 reviews were included. The most commonly evaluated strategies were those targeted at the level of individual professionals, rather than those targeting organisations or context. These strategies (eg, audit and feedback, educational meetings, educational outreach, reminders) on their own demonstrated a small to modest improvement (2–9%) in professional practice or behaviour with considerable variability in the observed effects. The effects of multifaceted strategies targeted at professionals were mixed and not necessarily more effective than single strategies alone. There was relatively little review evidence on implementation strategies at the levels of organisation and wider context. Evidence on cost-effectiveness was limited and data on costs of different strategies were scarce and/or of low quality. Conclusions There is a substantial literature on implementation strategies aimed at changing professional practices or behaviour. It remains unclear which implementation strategies are more likely to be effective than others and under what conditions. Future research should focus on identifying and assessing the effectiveness of strategies targeted at the wider context and organisational levels and examining the costs and cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies. PROSPERO registration number CRD42014009410.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Breaking down barriers: integrating health and care services for older people in England.

              Like many other post-industrial societies, England is facing demographic and political pressures to reduce the fragmentation of services for older people. Moreover, current government policies emphasise collaboration and 'partnership', particularly between health and social care services. Recently, two new policy initiatives have enabled the full integration of services to take place, involving formerly separate health and social care organisations-between family doctors (general practitioners) and community health services, and between health and social services organisations. Both initiatives also allow the pooling of previously separate funding streams. This paper presents findings from evaluations of these two initiatives. Drawing on this evidence, the paper concludes that structural integration can transform preoccupations over narrow sectoral responsibilities and boundaries to a 'whole systems' paradigm of service planning and delivery. However, major internal barriers to integration may remain: these include professional domains and identities, and differential power relationships between newly integrated services and professionals. Moreover, the success of these new horizontal, inter-organisational arrangements is profoundly influenced by the wider policy environment and by vertical relationships with national government. Together, these pressures exclude the voices of older people, and therefore call into question whether the considerable organisational upheaval of service integration will be able to deliver the changes valued by older people themselves.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Claire.mitchell@manchester.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Family Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2296
                29 May 2020
                29 May 2020
                2020
                : 21
                : 96
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5379.8, ISNI 0000000121662407, Alliance Manchester Business School, , University of Manchester and NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Greater Manchester, ; Booth Street West, Manchester, M15 6PB UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.412346.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0237 2025, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, , University of Manchester and NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Greater Manchester, ; Salford, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2445-8468
                Article
                1168
                10.1186/s12875-020-01168-z
                7260839
                32471353
                d6db095c-98a8-4135-9ce7-f6b1b89204c9
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 13 September 2019
                : 17 May 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012358, Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care - Greater Manchester;
                Award ID: NA
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Medicine
                integration,community services,health care,social care,qualitative research
                Medicine
                integration, community services, health care, social care, qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content200

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors349