Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      TeV Scale Universal Seesaw, Vacuum Stability and Heavy Higgs

      Preprint
      ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We discuss the issue of vacuum stability of standard model by embedding it within the TeV scale left-right universal seesaw model (called SLRM in the text). This model has only two coupling parameters \((\lambda_1, \lambda_2)\) in the Higgs potential and only two physical neutral Higgs bosons \((h, H)\). We explore the range of values for \((\lambda_1, \lambda_2)\) for which the light Higgs boson mass \(M_h=126\) GeV and the vacuum is stable for all values of the Higgs fields. Combining with the further requirement that the scalar self couplings remain perturbative till typical GUT scales of order \(10^{16}\) GeV, we find (i) an upper and lower limit on the second Higgs \((H)\) mass to be within the range: \(0.4 \leq \frac{M_H}{v_R}\leq 0.7\), where the \(v_R\) is the parity breaking scale and (ii) that the heavy vector-like top, bottom and \(\tau\) partner fermions (\(P_3, N_3, E_3\)) mass have an upper bound \(M_{P_3, N_3, E_3} \leq v_R\). We discuss some phenomenological aspects of the model pertaining to LHC.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          26 January 2014
          2014-05-26
          Article
          10.1007/JHEP06(2014)072
          1401.6701
          d7f4b519-031b-41a2-8b97-b1aec126effb

          http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          UMD-PP-014-02
          JHEP06(2014)072
          21 pages, 7 figures, some typos corrected and references updated, accepted for publication in JHEP
          hep-ph

          Comments

          Comment on this article