1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Developing a predictive risk score for perioperative blood transfusion: a retrospective study in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing free flap reconstruction surgery

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          A simple and accurate scoring system to predict risk of blood transfusion in patients having surgical tumor resection with immediate free flap reconstruction primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) is lacking. Anticipating the blood transfusion requirements in patients with oral cancer is of great clinical importance. This research aimed to propose a valid model to predict transfusion requirements in patients undergoing surgery with free flap reconstruction for an OOSCC.

          Methods

          This retrospective study consisted of 385 patients who underwent oncologic surgery with immediate free flap reconstruction for locally advanced OOSCC from 2012 to 2019. The primary outcome measured was the exposure of patients to perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Based on a multivariate model of independent risk variables and their odds ratio, a blood transfusion risk score (TRS) was developed to predict the likelihood of the perioperative blood transfusion. The discriminatory accuracy of the model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Youden index was used to identify the optimal cut-point.

          Results

          Logistic regression analyses identified lymph node status, preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels, bone resection, osseous free tissue transfer, and operative duration were identified as independent predictors of blood transfusion. A TRS integrating these variables was separated into three categories. The TRS assessed the transfusion risk with good predictive ability, with an overall area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.826. At the optimal cut-point of 5.5, the TRS had a sensitivity of 72.3% and a specificity of 78.2%. The ROC analysis showed that patients with a TRS of 5.5 or more had a greater requirement for perioperative transfusion.

          Conclusions

          The use of the integer-based TRS allowed the identification of high-risk patients who may require perioperative transfusion undergoing tumor resection surgery for the treatment of OOSCC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Practice Guidelines From the AABB: Red Blood Cell Transfusion Thresholds and Storage.

          More than 100 million units of blood are collected worldwide each year, yet the indication for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and the optimal length of RBC storage prior to transfusion are uncertain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Transfusion-related immunomodulation and cancer

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prognostic significance of perioperative blood transfusion in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

              The influence of perioperative blood transfusion on survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is still not convincingly determined. To investigate the effect of perioperative allogeneic transfusion on survival in stage II-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, we studied a consecutive series of 105 patients undergoing primary tumor resection and neck dissection. Retrospective analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models with 16 variables. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion was required in 64 (61%) patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the number of positive nodes and > or =3 units of red blood cell transfusion were an independent prognostic indicators. The calculated odds ratio for death after > or =3 units transfused was 5.79 (95% confidence interval, 1.56-21.53, p <.01). More than 3 units of allogeneic red blood cells transfused might shorten the survival of patients with oral cavity cancer. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Transl Med
                Ann Transl Med
                ATM
                Annals of Translational Medicine
                AME Publishing Company
                2305-5839
                2305-5847
                May 2021
                May 2021
                : 9
                : 10
                : 854
                Affiliations
                [1 ]deptDepartment of Clinical Laboratory , Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology , Beijing, China;
                [2 ]deptDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology , Beijing, China;
                [3 ]deptDepartment of Medical Record , Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology , Beijing, China
                Author notes

                Contributions: (I) Conception and design: JQ Su, S Xie, ZG Cai; (II) Administrative support: ZG Cai; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: All authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: JQ Su; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: JQ Su, S Xie; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

                [#]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Correspondence to: Zhi-Gang Cai. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China. Email: c2013xs@ 123456163.com .
                [^]

                ORCID: Jun-Qi Su, 0000-0002-0548-2462; Zhi-Gang Cai, 0000-0001-7657-8843.

                Article
                atm-09-10-854
                10.21037/atm-21-1484
                8184453
                34164488
                d80331e9-0931-4014-99c7-04451bc0f7f0
                2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

                Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

                History
                : 12 March 2021
                : 17 May 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                blood transfusion,oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ooscc),free flap reconstruction,transfusion risk score (trs),risk factor

                Comments

                Comment on this article