52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tailored support for type 2 diabetes patients with an acute coronary event after discharge from hospital – design and development of a randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with an acute coronary event (ACE) experience decreased quality of life and increased distress. According to the American Diabetes Association, discharge from the hospital is a time of increased distress for all patients. Tailored support specific to diabetes is scarce in that period. We developed an intervention based on Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, Leventhal’s Common Sense Model, and results of focus groups. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention to reduce distress in type 2 diabetes patients who experienced a first ACE.

          Methods

          Randomised controlled trial. Two hundred patients are recruited in thirteen hospitals. A diabetes nurse visits the patients in the intervention group ( n = 100) at home within three weeks after discharge from hospital, and again after two weeks and two months. The control group ( n = 100) receives a consultation by telephone. The primary outcome is diabetes-related distress, measured with the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are well-being, health status, anxiety, depression, HbA1c, blood pressure and lipids. Mediating variables are self-management, self-efficacy and illness representations. Outcomes are measured with questionnaires directly after discharge from hospital and five months later. Biomedical variables are obtained from the records from the primary care physician and the hospital. Differences between groups in change over time are analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The Holm-Bonferroni correction is used to adjust for multiplicity.

          Discussion

          Type 2 diabetes patients who experience a first ACE need tailored support after discharge from the hospital. This trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of a supportive intervention in reducing distress in these patients.

          Trial registration

          NCT01801631

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: executive summary. The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.

              Randomized clinical trials that compare two treatments on a continuous outcome can be analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or a t-test approach. We present a method for the sample size calculation when ANCOVA is used. We derived an approximate sample size formula. Simulations were used to verify the accuracy of the formula and to improve the approximation for small trials. The sample size calculations are illustrated in a clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis. If the correlation between the outcome measured at baseline and at follow-up is rho, ANCOVA comparing groups of (1-rho(2))n subjects has the same power as t-test comparing groups of n subjects. When on the same data, ANCOVA is used instead of t-test, the precision of the treatment estimate is increased, and the length of the confidence interval is reduced by a factor 1-rho(2). ANCOVA may considerably reduce the number of patients required for a trial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Diabetol Metab Syndr
                Diabetol Metab Syndr
                Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
                BioMed Central
                1758-5996
                2014
                18 January 2014
                : 6
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, STR 6.131, P.O. box 85500, Utrecht, GA 3508, The Netherlands
                [2 ]NIVEL, Netherlands institute for health services research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [3 ]EMGO Institute VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Article
                1758-5996-6-5
                10.1186/1758-5996-6-5
                3898822
                24438342
                d827cd1c-9a80-407c-b4c1-799381bc6977
                Copyright © 2014 Kasteleyn et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 August 2013
                : 5 January 2014
                Categories
                Research

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                primary care,acute coronary event (ace),quality of life,self-management,type 2 diabetes,illness representations,depression,distress,self-efficacy

                Comments

                Comment on this article