2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safety and efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of a novel enhanced protein solution (JTA-004) compared to hylan G-F 20 in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase II/III study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          New minimally invasive treatments are vital to delay joint replacement surgery in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study was designed to select the most effective among three formulations of an enhanced protein solution containing clonidine, hyaluronic acid, and human plasma (JTA-004), and compare the safety and efficacy of intra-articular administration of the selected formulation with a reference treatment (hyaluronic acid) in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients.

          Methods

          In this two-stage, double-blind, phase II/III study conducted in 12 Belgian centers, 50–79-year-old patients with primary knee osteoarthritis were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one dose of one of three JTA-004 formulations (differing in clonidine concentration [50 or 100 μg/ml] and volume [2 or 4 ml]) or the reference treatment (hylan G-F 20). Patients were evaluated using Western Ontario McMaster Universities (WOMAC®) Scores and the Short-Form health survey up to 6 months post-injection (Month 6). Drug consumption and safety were evaluated.

          Results

          Among 164 treated patients, 147 completed the study. The JTA-004 formulation containing 200 μg clonidine and 20 mg hyaluronic acid in 2 ml (JTA-200/2) was selected based on interim results at Month 6. The difference in adjusted mean change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score from baseline (JTA-200/2 minus reference group) at Month 6 was − 9.49 mm; statistical superiority of JTA-200/2 over the reference was not demonstrated. No statistically significant differences in adjusted mean changes from baseline between JTA-200/2 and reference groups were observed for Pain, Physical Function and Stiffness Subscales WOMAC Scores, Total WOMAC Score, and Well-being Score at any timepoint, although JTA-200/2 induced larger improvements in WOMAC Scores than the reference. Statistically significantly larger improvements in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores for JTA-004 versus the reference were observed in post-hoc analyses on pooled data from all JTA-004 formulations at Month 6 ( p = 0.030) and Month 3 ( p = 0.014). All JTA-004 formulations had clinically acceptable safety profiles.

          Conclusions

          This study provided preliminary evidence of the safety of intra-articular injection of JTA-004 in knee osteoarthritis patients. Phase III randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the efficacy of JTA-004 in knee osteoarthritis.

          Trial registration

          Clinicaltrials.gov/identifier NCT02740231;  clinicaltrialsregister.eu/identifier 2015–002117-30. Retrospectively registered 13/4/2016.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04750-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Classifications in Brief: Kellgren-Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intra-articular treatment options for knee osteoarthritis

            Intra-articular drug delivery has a number of advantages over systemic administration; however, for the past 20 years, intra-articular treatment options for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) have been limited to analgesics, glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid (HA) and a small number of unproven alternative therapies. Although HA and glucocorticoids can provide clinically meaningful benefits to an appreciable number of patients, emerging evidence indicates that the apparent effectiveness of these treatments is largely a result of other factors, including the placebo effect. Biologic drugs that target inflammatory processes are used to manage rheumatoid arthritis, but have not translated well into use in OA. A lack of high-level evidence and methodological limitations hinder our understanding of so-called 'stem' cell therapies and, although the off-label administration of intra-articular cell therapies (such as platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow aspirate concentrate) is common, high-quality clinical data are needed before these treatments can be recommended. A number of promising intra-articular treatments are currently in clinical development in the United States, including small-molecule and biologic therapies, devices and gene therapies. Although the prospect of new, non-surgical treatments for OA is exciting, the benefits of new treatments must be carefully weighed against their costs and potential risks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intraarticular injections (corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, platelet rich plasma) for the knee osteoarthritis.

              Osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex "whole joint" disease pursued by inflammatory mediators, rather than purely a process of "wear and tear". Besides cartilage degradation, synovitis, subchondral bone remodeling, degeneration of ligaments and menisci, and hypertrophy of the joint capsule take parts in the pathogenesis. Pain is the hallmark symptom of OA, but the extent to which structural pathology in OA contributes to the pain experience is still not well known. For the knee OA, intraarticular (IA) injection (corticosteroids, viscosupplements, blood-derived products) is preferred as the last nonoperative modality, if the other conservative treatment modalities are ineffective. IA corticosteroid injections provide short term reduction in OA pain and can be considered as an adjunct to core treatment for the relief of moderate to severe pain in people with OA. IA hyaluronic acid (HA) injections might have efficacy and might provide pain reduction in mild OA of knee up to 24 wk. But for HA injections, the cost-effectiveness is an important concern that patients must be informed about the efficacy of these preparations. Although more high-quality evidence is needed, recent studies indicate that IA platelet rich plasma injections are promising for relieving pain, improving knee function and quality of life, especially in younger patients, and in mild OA cases. The current literature and our experience indicate that IA injections are safe and have positive effects for patient satisfaction. But, there is no data that any of the IA injections will cause osteophytes to regress or cartilage and meniscus to regenerate in patients with substantial and irreversible bone and cartilage damage.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                marie.bettonville@iteostherapeutics.com
                marc.leon@hap.be
                Joelle.Margaux@erasme.ulb.ac.be
                Didier.UrbinChoffray@chrcitadelle.be
                emilie.theunissen@cspo.be
                tatiana.besse-hammer@chu-brugmann.be
                yfortems@gmail.com
                severine.verlinden@chrhautesenne.be
                info@zamconsulting.be
                asd@cryotherapeutics.com
                jfkaux@uliege.be
                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2474
                19 October 2021
                19 October 2021
                2021
                : 22
                : 888
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.476169.b, Bone Therapeutics S.A, ; Rue Auguste Piccard 37, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium
                [2 ]Current Address: iTeos Belgium SA, Rue des Frères Wright 29, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium
                [3 ]GRID grid.492608.1, CHU Ambroise Paré, ; Boulevard Kennedy 2, 7000 Mons, Belgium
                [4 ]GRID grid.412157.4, ISNI 0000 0000 8571 829X, CUB Erasme, ; Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium
                [5 ]GRID grid.413914.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0645 1582, CHR Citadelle, ; Boulevard du 12ème de Ligne 1, 4000 Liège, Belgium
                [6 ]GRID grid.477044.4, Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies, ; Avenue Reine Fabiola 9, 1340 Ottignies, Belgium
                [7 ]GRID grid.411371.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0469 8354, CHU Brugmann, ; Place Arthur Van Gehuchten 4, 1020 Bruxelles, Belgium
                [8 ]AZ Sint-Jozef, Oude Liersebaan 4, 2390 Malle, Belgium
                [9 ]CHR Haute Senne, Chaussée de Braine 49, 7060 Soignies, Belgium
                [10 ]Current Address: ZAM Consulting, Avenue de la Calèche 24, 1300 Wavre, Belgium
                [11 ]Current Address: Cryotherapeutics SA, Rue de Bruxelles 174 E40 Business Park, 4340 Awans, Belgium
                [12 ]GRID grid.411374.4, ISNI 0000 0000 8607 6858, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine & Sport Traumatology Department, , University and University Hospital of Liège, ; Avenue de l’Hôpital 35, 4000 Liège, Belgium
                Article
                4750
                10.1186/s12891-021-04750-3
                8527807
                34666767
                d88d69dd-5a20-46c3-ba51-008c6820283f
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 19 February 2021
                : 3 September 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Orthopedics
                knee osteoarthritis,clinical trial,intra-articular injection,hyaluronic acid,clonidine,human plasma

                Comments

                Comment on this article