6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rethinking obstetric violence and the “neglect of neglect”: the silence of a labour ward milieu in a South African district hospital

      research-article
      ,
      BMC International Health and Human Rights
      BioMed Central
      South Africa, Obstetric violence, Milieu, Neglect, Qualitative

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Research into the mistreatment of women during childbirth has increased over recent years. Overt violence is an important focus of research, but recently there has been increasing recognition that there are other ways in which women in labour may be uncared for or even hurt. As part of a larger study focussing on staff responses to stillbirths, we wanted to gain contextual information on how high risk pregnancies are handled in general in Khayelitsha Hospital, a district hospital in an impoverished urban setting in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. This health care system experiences an immense patient load, the poverty of the community it serves, and the numerous traumas affecting both patients and staff.

          Methods

          In order to obtain rich exploratory data, a qualitative research methodology was used. The primary data source was observations in the labour ward, interviewing labour ward staff (doctors, nurse, and cleaners). The secondary data source was the analysis of hospital documents, specifically those related to labour ward policy.

          Results

          From our numerous observations and discussions, it is clear that no one is being overtly mistreated in this hospital and patients are medically well attended to. Although we saw no physical abuse, we noted the silence in the ward. Beside medical related interactions, we also noted that there were limited interactions between the women and the health care providers.

          Conclusions

          Silence can be a form of neglect as it leaves the women feeling uncared for and not seen. In an overburdened health care system where both staff and patients are often overwhelmed or traumatised, silence can be a way in which a system defends itself against what it knows it cannot provide.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence.

          During recent decades, a growing and preoccupying excess of medical interventions during childbirth, even in physiological and uncomplicated births, together with a concerning spread of abusive and disrespectful practices towards women during childbirth across the world, have been reported. Despite research and policy-making to address these problems, changing childbirth practices has proved to be difficult. We argue that the excessive rates of medical interventions and disrespect towards women during childbirth should be analysed as a consequence of structural violence, and that the concept of obstetric violence, as it is being used in Latin American childbirth activism and legal documents, might prove to be a useful tool for addressing structural violence in maternity care such as high intervention rates, non-consented care, disrespect and other abusive practices.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Beyond measurement: the drivers of disrespect and abuse in obstetric care

            Concerns about disrespect and abuse (D&A) experienced by women during institutional birth have become critical to the discourse on maternal health. The rapid growth of the field from diverse points of origin has given rise to multiple and, at times, confusing interpretations of D&A, pointing to the need for greater clarity in the concepts themselves. Furthermore, attention to measurement of the problem has been excessive when viewed in relation to the small amount of work on critical drivers of disrespect and abuse. This paper raises some key issues of conceptualisation and measurement for the field, puts forward a working definition, and explores two critical drivers of D&A - intersecting social and economic inequality, and the institutional structures and processes that frame the practice of obstetric care. By identifying gaps and raising questions about the deeper causes of D&A, we point to potentially fruitful directions for research and action.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Obstetric violence: a Latin American legal response to mistreatment during childbirth

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Maura.Lappeman@westerncape.gov.za
                lswartz@sun.ac.za
                Journal
                BMC Int Health Hum Rights
                BMC Int Health Hum Rights
                BMC International Health and Human Rights
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-698X
                30 October 2019
                30 October 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 30
                Affiliations
                ISNI 0000 0001 2214 904X, GRID grid.11956.3a, Department of Psychology, , Stellenbosch University, ; Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0095-0586
                Article
                218
                10.1186/s12914-019-0218-2
                6822362
                31666133
                d8bdd3b8-4c73-47de-9185-85ce9a05d96b
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 27 November 2018
                : 20 October 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Health & Social care
                south africa,obstetric violence,milieu,neglect,qualitative
                Health & Social care
                south africa, obstetric violence, milieu, neglect, qualitative

                Comments

                Comment on this article