32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A strategy to enhance the safety and efficiency of handovers of ICU patients: study protocol of the pICUp study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To use intensive care unit (ICU) facilities efficiently and ensure high quality of care, an optimal patient flow is necessary. Discharging patients relieves the pressure on ICU beds but the risk of premature discharge must be managed carefully. Suboptimal patient discharge may result in ICU readmissions and in patients’ death.

          The aim of this study is to obtain insight into the safety and efficiency of current ICU discharge practices and into barriers and facilitators to the implementation of effective ICU discharge interventions, and to develop an implementation strategy tailored to the barriers and facilitators identified.

          Methods/design

          This study exists of five phases. Phase A: analysis of routinely registered data on variation in ICU readmissions and hospital mortality after ICU discharge of all ICUs participating in the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation registry (n = 83). Phase B: systematic review of effective interventions aiming to improve the efficiency and safety of the ICU discharge process. Phase C: assessing the intervention adherence with a questionnaire survey among all Dutch ICUs (n = 90). Phase D: assessing barriers and facilitators to the implementation of effective ICU discharge interventions with a questionnaire survey among all Dutch intensivists (n = 700). The questionnaire will be based on barriers and facilitators identified by focus groups (n = 4) and individual interviews with professionals of ICUs and general wards and adult discharged ICU patients (n = 25 to 30). Phase E: systematic development of an implementation strategy based on the sampled data in phase A to D, and effective implementation strategies from the literature using the intervention mapping method.

          Discussion

          Using theory and empirical data, an implementation strategy will be developed to improve the safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process. The developed strategy will be evaluated in a subsequent study. The knowledge obtained in this study should be used for further implementation of ICU discharge interventions, and can be used for implementation of handover interventions in other healthcare transition settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge, and triage. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine.

          To provide guidelines for admission, discharge, and triage of adult patients to the intensive care unit (ICU), based on expert opinion and the relevant literature. Publications relevant to the admission, discharge, and triage of patients to the ICU were obtained from the medical literature. Not applicable. Articles were reviewed and the relevant information extracted for analysis by an expert panel. The articles were reviewed and graded levels of recommendation made based on a rating system described in the text. Although little scientifically rigorous data exist validating the criteria for admission, discharge, and triage of adult patients to the ICU, current literature and expert opinion support guidelines to streamline the admission, discharge, and triage process.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Designing a quality improvement intervention: a systematic approach.

            Most quality improvement or change management interventions are currently designed intuitively and their results are often disappointing. While improving the effectiveness of interventions requires systematic development, no specific methodology for composing intervention strategies and programmes is available. This paper describes the methodology of systematically designing quality of care improvement interventions, including problem analysis, intervention design and pretests. Several theories on quality improvement and change management are integrated and valuable materials from health promotion are added. One method of health promotion-intervention mapping-is introduced and applied. It describes the translation of knowledge about barriers to and facilitators of change into a concrete intervention programme. Systematic development of interventions, although time consuming, appears to be worthwhile. Decisions that have to be made during the design process of a quality improvement intervention are visualised, allowing them to serve as a starting point for a systematic evaluation of the intervention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Patients readmitted to ICUs* : a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes.

              To evaluate the causes, risk factors, and mortality rates associated with unexpected readmission to medical and surgical ICUs. MEDLINE citation review of primary articles focusing on ICU readmission or ICU outcomes from January 1966 to June 1999, and contact with authors of primary studies. Eight primary studies of ICU readmission and eight multi-institutional ICU outcome studies that reported ICU readmission rates were included. We abstracted data on the methodology and design of the primary studies, overall rates, causes, predictors, outcomes, and measures of quality of care associated with ICU readmission. The average ICU readmission rate of 7% (range, 4 to 14%) has remained relatively unchanged in both North America and Europe. Respiratory and cardiac conditions were the most common (30 to 70%) precipitating cause of ICU readmission. Patients readmitted to ICUs had average hospital stays at least twice as long as nonreadmitted patients. Hospital death rates were 2- to 10-times higher for readmitted patients than for those who survived an ICU admission and were never readmitted. Predictors of ICU readmission have been neither well studied nor reproducible. Unstable vital signs, especially respiratory and heart rate abnormalities, and the presence of poor pulmonary function at time of ICU discharge appear to be the most consistent predictors of ICU readmission. There were no consistent data supporting the use of readmission rates as a measure of quality of care. ICU readmission is associated with dramatically higher hospital mortality. Unstable vital signs at the time of ICU discharge are the most consistent predictor of ICU readmission. Further studies focusing on processes of ICU and hospital care are needed to determine if ICU readmission rates are a measure of quality of care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central
                1748-5908
                2013
                14 June 2013
                : 8
                : 67
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, the Netherlands
                [3 ]Academic Center for Primary Care, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
                Article
                1748-5908-8-67
                10.1186/1748-5908-8-67
                3697992
                23767696
                d957eebd-1b8b-44c0-badd-ee0ce572e5c0
                Copyright © 2013 van Sluisveld et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 April 2013
                : 13 June 2013
                Categories
                Study Protocol

                Medicine
                intensive care,critical care,patient safety,quality of healthcare,patient handoff,patient readmission,hospital mortality,guideline adherence,implementation

                Comments

                Comment on this article