7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in Frontotemporal Dementia and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: A Systematic Review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: It can be challenging to discriminate between progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). However, a correct diagnosis is a precondition for targeted treatment strategies and proper patient counseling. There has been a growing interest to identify cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, including neurofilament light chain (NfL). Objective: This systematic review evaluates the existing literature on neurofilament light in CSF aiming to validate its utility for differentiating FTD from PSP. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted. A broad range of synonyms for PSP, NfL, and FTD as well as associated MeSH terms, were combined and used as keywords when searching. Relevant data were extracted and assessed for risk of bias. Results: Nine studies including a total of 671 patients with FTD, 254 patients with PSP, 523 healthy controls, and 1,771 patients with other disorders were included in the review. Four studies found a significantly higher level of CSF NfL in FTD (n = 445) compared to PSP (n = 124); however, in three of these studies the difference was only significant in certain FTD variants. Four studies found no significant difference in CSF NfL between PSP (n = 98) and FTD (n = 248). One study found a significantly higher level of NfL in PSP (n = 33) compared to FTD (n = 16). Conclusion: In the majority of patients in the studies included in this review, a higher level of NfL in CSF was found in patients with FTD compared to patients with PSP; however, results were inconsistent and prospective studies including large study cohorts are needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

          Based on the recent literature and collective experience, an international consortium developed revised guidelines for the diagnosis of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. The validation process retrospectively reviewed clinical records and compared the sensitivity of proposed and earlier criteria in a multi-site sample of patients with pathologically verified frontotemporal lobar degeneration. According to the revised criteria, 'possible' behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia requires three of six clinically discriminating features (disinhibition, apathy/inertia, loss of sympathy/empathy, perseverative/compulsive behaviours, hyperorality and dysexecutive neuropsychological profile). 'Probable' behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia adds functional disability and characteristic neuroimaging, while behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia 'with definite frontotemporal lobar degeneration' requires histopathological confirmation or a pathogenic mutation. Sixteen brain banks contributed cases meeting histopathological criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration and a clinical diagnosis of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies or vascular dementia at presentation. Cases with predominant primary progressive aphasia or extra-pyramidal syndromes were excluded. In these autopsy-confirmed cases, an experienced neurologist or psychiatrist ascertained clinical features necessary for making a diagnosis according to previous and proposed criteria at presentation. Of 137 cases where features were available for both proposed and previously established criteria, 118 (86%) met 'possible' criteria, and 104 (76%) met criteria for 'probable' behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. In contrast, 72 cases (53%) met previously established criteria for the syndrome (P < 0.001 for comparison with 'possible' and 'probable' criteria). Patients who failed to meet revised criteria were significantly older and most had atypical presentations with marked memory impairment. In conclusion, the revised criteria for behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia improve diagnostic accuracy compared with previously established criteria in a sample with known frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Greater sensitivity of the proposed criteria may reflect the optimized diagnostic features, less restrictive exclusion features and a flexible structure that accommodates different initial clinical presentations. Future studies will be needed to establish the reliability and specificity of these revised diagnostic guidelines.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants

            This article provides a classification of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and its 3 main variants to improve the uniformity of case reporting and the reliability of research results. Criteria for the 3 variants of PPA--nonfluent/agrammatic, semantic, and logopenic--were developed by an international group of PPA investigators who convened on 3 occasions to operationalize earlier published clinical descriptions for PPA subtypes. Patients are first diagnosed with PPA and are then divided into clinical variants based on specific speech and language features characteristic of each subtype. Classification can then be further specified as "imaging-supported" if the expected pattern of atrophy is found and "with definite pathology" if pathologic or genetic data are available. The working recommendations are presented in lists of features, and suggested assessment tasks are also provided. These recommendations have been widely agreed upon by a large group of experts and should be used to ensure consistency of PPA classification in future studies. Future collaborations will collect prospective data to identify relationships between each of these syndromes and specific biomarkers for a more detailed understanding of clinicopathologic correlations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria.

              PSP is a neuropathologically defined disease entity. Clinical diagnostic criteria, published in 1996 by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/Society for PSP, have excellent specificity, but their sensitivity is limited for variant PSP syndromes with presentations other than Richardson's syndrome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
                JAD
                IOS Press
                13872877
                18758908
                May 03 2022
                May 03 2022
                : 87
                : 1
                : 131-140
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark
                Article
                10.3233/JAD-215616
                35275542
                d9de23a9-a0f8-41d3-835d-b7b6a34031e9
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article