27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      HCN1-mediated interactions of ketamine and propofol in a mean field model of the EEG

      abstract
      1 , 2 , 3 , , 2 , 4 , 5
      BMC Neuroscience
      BioMed Central
      Twenty Second Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2013
      13-18 July 2013

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ketamine and propofol, two popular anesthetic agents, are generally believed to operate via disparate primary mechanisms: ketamine through NMDA antagonism and propofol through the potentiation of GABAA-gated receptor currents. However, surprisingly the effect of ketamine on the EEG is markedly altered in the presence of propofol. Specifically, while ketamine alone results in a downshift of the peak frequency of the alpha rhythm, and propofol keeps it roughly constant - when administered together, they increase the alpha peak frequency [1]. Recently it has been found that both ketamine and propofol inhibit the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channel form 1 (HCN1) subunits, which induces neuronal membrane hyperpolarization [2]. Furthermore, HCN1 knockout mice are significantly less susceptible to hypnosis with these agents; but equally affected by HCN1-neutral etomidate [2]. We show here [3] that an established mean field model of electrocortical activity can predict the EEG changes induced by combining ketamine and propofol by taking into account merely the HCN1-mediated hyperpolarisations, but neglecting their supposed main mechanisms of action (NMDA and GABAA, respectively). See Figure 1. Figure 1 Predicted shift of the alpha peak frequency of ten parameter sets during four phases of linear change to the normalized ketamine (K) and propofol (P) concentrations, respectively. Our results suggest that ketamine and propofol are infra-additive in their HCN1-mediated actions. This is consistent with independent experimental evidence[4]. We show here that the HCN1-mediated actions of ketamine and propofol, hitherto neglected by models of anaesthetic action, can not only explain a range of counterintuitive induced EEG changes but also predicts the infra-additivity of these drugs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          HCN1 channel subunits are a molecular substrate for hypnotic actions of ketamine.

          Ketamine has important anesthetic, analgesic, and psychotropic actions. It is widely believed that NMDA receptor inhibition accounts for ketamine actions, but there remains a dearth of behavioral evidence to support this hypothesis. Here, we present an alternative, behaviorally relevant molecular substrate for anesthetic effects of ketamine: the HCN1 pacemaker channels that underlie a neuronal hyperpolarization-activated cationic current (I(h)). Ketamine caused subunit-specific inhibition of recombinant HCN1-containing channels and neuronal I(h) at clinically relevant concentrations; the channels were more potently inhibited by S-(+)-ketamine than racemic ketamine, consistent with anesthetic actions of the compounds. In cortical pyramidal neurons from wild-type, but not HCN1 knock-out mice, ketamine induced membrane hyperpolarization and enhanced dendritosomatic synaptic coupling; both effects are known to promote cortical synchronization and support slow cortical rhythms, like those accompanying anesthetic-induced hypnosis. Accordingly, we found that the potency for ketamine to provoke a loss-of-righting reflex, a behavioral correlate of hypnosis, was strongly reduced in HCN1 knock-out mice. In addition, hypnotic sensitivity to two other intravenous anesthetics in HCN1 knock-out mice matched effects on HCN1 channels; propofol selectively inhibited HCN1 channels and propofol sensitivity was diminished in HCN1 knock-out mice, whereas etomidate had no effect on HCN1 channels and hypnotic sensitivity to etomidate was unaffected by HCN1 gene deletion. These data advance HCN1 channels as a novel molecular target for ketamine, provide a plausible neuronal mechanism for enhanced cortical synchronization during anesthetic-induced hypnosis and suggest that HCN1 channels might contribute to other unexplained actions of ketamine.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Is synergy the rule? A review of anesthetic interactions producing hypnosis and immobility.

            Drug interactions may reveal mechanisms of drug action: additive interactions suggest a common site of action, and synergistic interactions suggest different sites of action. We applied this reasoning in a review of published data on anesthetic drug interactions for the end-points of hypnosis and immobility. We searched Medline for all manuscripts listing propofol, etomidate, methohexital, thiopental, midazolam, diazepam, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, alfentanil, remifentanil, droperidol, metoclopramide, lidocaine, halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane, N2O, and Xe that contained terms suggesting interaction: interaction, additive, additivity, synergy, synergism, synergistic, antagonism, antagonistic, isobologram, or isobolographic. When available, data were reanalyzed using fraction analysis or response surface analysis. Between drug classes, most interactions were synergistic. The major exception was ketamine, which typically interacted in either an additive or infra-additive (antagonistic) manner. Inhaled anesthetics typically showed synergy with IV anesthetics, but were additive or, in the case of nitrous oxide and isoflurane, possibly infra-additive, with each other. Except for ketamine, IV anesthetics acting at different sites usually demonstrated synergy. Inhaled anesthetics usually demonstrated synergy with IV anesthetics, but no pair of inhaled anesthetics interacted synergistically.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ketamine, an NMDA-antagonist, increases the oscillatory frequencies of alpha-peaks on the electroencephalographic power spectrum.

              Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist, is known to activate the electroencephalogram (EEG), despite its sedative effects. Spindle oscillations are known to be related to the sedative actions of the reticular thalamic nucleus with links to thalamocortical neurons. This study was designed to examine the effect of ketamine on the spindle oscillations to understand the simultaneous sedative effect and EEG activation that occurs with ketamine, by comparing the EEG in emergence. Anesthesia was induced with propofol using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) system (3.5 microg/ml). Seventeen patients, scheduled for non-cranial surgery under general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia, were randomly divided into two groups: (i) anesthesia was maintained with TCI-propofol alone (n= 8) and (ii) anesthesia was maintained with TCI-propofol and intravenously administered ketamine (n= 9). The EEG was continuously monitored and EEG indices and power spectra were determined. Propofol alone caused the alpha-peaks of the power spectra to occur at an average frequency of 10.4 +/- 0.9 Hz; the addition of ketamine shifted the peaks to higher frequencies of 15.1 +/- 1.4 Hz (P < 0.05). On the other hand, when the EEG was activated by discontinuation of propofol, the corresponding alpha-peaks disappeared. Ketamine increased the frequencies of alpha-spindle waves induced by propofol, but did not block their formations. The phenomena have the possibility to underlie the cooperative effect between propofol and ketamine concerning sedation and anesthesia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Conference
                BMC Neurosci
                BMC Neurosci
                BMC Neuroscience
                BioMed Central
                1471-2202
                2013
                8 July 2013
                : 14
                : Suppl 1
                : O22
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Berkshire, RG6 6AY, UK
                [2 ]School of Psychology (CNCR), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
                [3 ]Donders Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen (Medical Centre), 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Brain & Psychological Sciences Research Centre, Swinburne Uni. of Tech., Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia
                [5 ]Cortical Dynamics Ltd., Suite 4, 462 Burwood Road, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia
                Article
                1471-2202-14-S1-O22
                10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-O22
                3704584
                da164534-a331-422b-adea-3ee956cef957
                Copyright © 2013 Bojak et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                Twenty Second Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2013
                Paris, France
                13-18 July 2013
                History
                Categories
                Oral Presentation

                Neurosciences
                Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article