4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brain control of bimanual movement enabled by recurrent neural networks

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Brain-computer interfaces have so far focused largely on enabling the control of a single effector, for example a single computer cursor or robotic arm. Restoring multi-effector motion could unlock greater functionality for people with paralysis (e.g., bimanual movement). However, it may prove challenging to decode the simultaneous motion of multiple effectors, as we recently found that a compositional neural code links movements across all limbs and that neural tuning changes nonlinearly during dual-effector motion. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of high-quality bimanual control of two cursors via neural network (NN) decoders. Through simulations, we show that NNs leverage a neural ‘laterality’ dimension to distinguish between left and right-hand movements as neural tuning to both hands become increasingly correlated. In training recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for two-cursor control, we developed a method that alters the temporal structure of the training data by dilating/compressing it in time and re-ordering it, which we show helps RNNs successfully generalize to the online setting. With this method, we demonstrate that a person with paralysis can control two computer cursors simultaneously. Our results suggest that neural network decoders may be advantageous for multi-effector decoding, provided they are designed to transfer to the online setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia.

            Paralysis or amputation of an arm results in the loss of the ability to orient the hand and grasp, manipulate, and carry objects, functions that are essential for activities of daily living. Brain-machine interfaces could provide a solution to restoring many of these lost functions. We therefore tested whether an individual with tetraplegia could rapidly achieve neurological control of a high-performance prosthetic limb using this type of an interface. We implanted two 96-channel intracortical microelectrodes in the motor cortex of a 52-year-old individual with tetraplegia. Brain-machine-interface training was done for 13 weeks with the goal of controlling an anthropomorphic prosthetic limb with seven degrees of freedom (three-dimensional translation, three-dimensional orientation, one-dimensional grasping). The participant's ability to control the prosthetic limb was assessed with clinical measures of upper limb function. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01364480. The participant was able to move the prosthetic limb freely in the three-dimensional workspace on the second day of training. After 13 weeks, robust seven-dimensional movements were performed routinely. Mean success rate on target-based reaching tasks was 91·6% (SD 4·4) versus median chance level 6·2% (95% CI 2·0-15·3). Improvements were seen in completion time (decreased from a mean of 148 s [SD 60] to 112 s [6]) and path efficiency (increased from 0·30 [0·04] to 0·38 [0·02]). The participant was also able to use the prosthetic limb to do skilful and coordinated reach and grasp movements that resulted in clinically significant gains in tests of upper limb function. No adverse events were reported. With continued development of neuroprosthetic limbs, individuals with long-term paralysis could recover the natural and intuitive command signals for hand placement, orientation, and reaching, allowing them to perform activities of daily living. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, National Institutes of Health, Department of Veterans Affairs, and UPMC Rehabilitation Institute. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings.

              Most sensory, cognitive and motor functions depend on the interactions of many neurons. In recent years, there has been rapid development and increasing use of technologies for recording from large numbers of neurons, either sequentially or simultaneously. A key question is what scientific insight can be gained by studying a population of recorded neurons beyond studying each neuron individually. Here, we examine three important motivations for population studies: single-trial hypotheses requiring statistical power, hypotheses of population response structure and exploratory analyses of large data sets. Many recent studies have adopted dimensionality reduction to analyze these populations and to find features that are not apparent at the level of individual neurons. We describe the dimensionality reduction methods commonly applied to population activity and offer practical advice about selecting methods and interpreting their outputs. This review is intended for experimental and computational researchers who seek to understand the role dimensionality reduction has had and can have in systems neuroscience, and who seek to apply these methods to their own data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ddeo@stanford.edu
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                18 January 2024
                18 January 2024
                2024
                : 14
                : 1598
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, ( https://ror.org/00f54p054) Stanford, CA USA
                [2 ]Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, ( https://ror.org/00f54p054) Stanford, CA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.413575.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2167 1581, Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, ; Stanford, CA USA
                [4 ]School of Engineering, Brown University, ( https://ror.org/05gq02987) Providence, RI USA
                [5 ]Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, ( https://ror.org/05gq02987) Providence, RI USA
                [6 ]VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, ( https://ror.org/041m0cc93) Providence, RI USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, , Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                [8 ]Bio-X Institute, Stanford University, ( https://ror.org/00f54p054) Stanford, CA USA
                [9 ]Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, ( https://ror.org/00f54p054) Stanford, CA USA
                [10 ]Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, ( https://ror.org/00f54p054) Stanford, CA USA
                [11 ]Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, ( https://ror.org/00f54p054) Stanford, CA USA
                Article
                51617
                10.1038/s41598-024-51617-3
                10796685
                38238386
                dab833a2-c7d1-41a9-b921-94520f26233f
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 18 October 2023
                : 7 January 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100014373, Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000011, Howard Hughes Medical Institute;
                Funded by: Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation R&D Service, US Department of Veterans Affairs
                Award ID: A2295R
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000065, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke;
                Award ID: U01-NS123101
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000055, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders;
                Award ID: R01-DC014034
                Funded by: Larry and Pamela Garlick
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                brain-machine interface,neural decoding
                Uncategorized
                brain-machine interface, neural decoding

                Comments

                Comment on this article