15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In a rapidly changing world we need methods to efficiently assess biodiversity in order to monitor ecosystem trends. Ecological monitoring often uses plant community composition to infer quality of sites but conventional aboveground surveys only capture a snapshot of the actively growing plant diversity. Environmental DNA (eDNA) extracted from soil samples, however, can include taxa represented by both active and dormant tissues, seeds, pollen, and detritus. Analysis of this eDNA through DNA metabarcoding provides a more comprehensive view of plant diversity at a site from a single assessment but it is not clear which DNA markers are best used to capture this diversity. Sequence recovery, annotation, and sequence resolution among taxa were evaluated for four established DNA markers ( matK, rbcL, ITS2, and the trnL P6 loop) in silico using database sequences and in situ using high throughput sequencing of 35 soil samples from a remote boreal wetland. Overall, ITS2 and rbcL are recommended for DNA metabarcoding of vascular plants from eDNA when not using customized or geographically restricted reference databases. We describe a new framework for evaluating DNA metabarcodes and, contrary to existing assumptions, we found that full length DNA barcode regions could outperform shorter markers for surveying plant diversity from soil samples. By using current DNA barcoding markers rbcL and ITS2 for plant metabarcoding, we can take advantage of existing resources such as the growing DNA barcode database. Our work establishes the value of standard DNA barcodes for soil plant eDNA analysis in ecological investigations and biomonitoring programs and supports the collaborative development of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A DNA barcode for land plants.

          DNA barcoding involves sequencing a standard region of DNA as a tool for species identification. However, there has been no agreement on which region(s) should be used for barcoding land plants. To provide a community recommendation on a standard plant barcode, we have compared the performance of 7 leading candidate plastid DNA regions (atpF-atpH spacer, matK gene, rbcL gene, rpoB gene, rpoC1 gene, psbK-psbI spacer, and trnH-psbA spacer). Based on assessments of recoverability, sequence quality, and levels of species discrimination, we recommend the 2-locus combination of rbcL+matK as the plant barcode. This core 2-locus barcode will provide a universal framework for the routine use of DNA sequence data to identify specimens and contribute toward the discovery of overlooked species of land plants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.

            Global biodiversity in freshwater and the oceans is declining at high rates. Reliable tools for assessing and monitoring aquatic biodiversity, especially for rare and secretive species, are important for efficient and timely management. Recent advances in DNA sequencing have provided a new tool for species detection from DNA present in the environment. In this study, we tested whether an environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach, using water samples, can be used for addressing significant questions in ecology and conservation. Two key aquatic vertebrate groups were targeted: amphibians and bony fish. The reliability of this method was cautiously validated in silico, in vitro and in situ. When compared with traditional surveys or historical data, eDNA metabarcoding showed a much better detection probability overall. For amphibians, the detection probability with eDNA metabarcoding was 0.97 (CI = 0.90-0.99) vs. 0.58 (CI = 0.50-0.63) for traditional surveys. For fish, in 89% of the studied sites, the number of taxa detected using the eDNA metabarcoding approach was higher or identical to the number detected using traditional methods. We argue that the proposed DNA-based approach has the potential to become the next-generation tool for ecological studies and standardized biodiversity monitoring in a wide range of aquatic ecosystems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases

              Background During the last 15 years the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nuclear DNA has been used as a target for analyzing fungal diversity in environmental samples, and has recently been selected as the standard marker for fungal DNA barcoding. In this study we explored the potential amplification biases that various commonly utilized ITS primers might introduce during amplification of different parts of the ITS region in samples containing mixed templates ('environmental barcoding'). We performed in silico PCR analyses with commonly used primer combinations using various ITS datasets obtained from public databases as templates. Results Some of the ITS primers, such as ITS1-F, were hampered with a high proportion of mismatches relative to the target sequences, and most of them appeared to introduce taxonomic biases during PCR. Some primers, e.g. ITS1-F, ITS1 and ITS5, were biased towards amplification of basidiomycetes, whereas others, e.g. ITS2, ITS3 and ITS4, were biased towards ascomycetes. The assumed basidiomycete-specific primer ITS4-B only amplified a minor proportion of basidiomycete ITS sequences, even under relaxed PCR conditions. Due to systematic length differences in the ITS2 region as well as the entire ITS, we found that ascomycetes will more easily amplify than basidiomycetes using these regions as targets. This bias can be avoided by using primers amplifying ITS1 only, but this would imply preferential amplification of 'non-dikarya' fungi. Conclusions We conclude that ITS primers have to be selected carefully, especially when used for high-throughput sequencing of environmental samples. We suggest that different primer combinations or different parts of the ITS region should be analyzed in parallel, or that alternative ITS primers should be searched for.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                16 June 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 6
                : e0157505
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]Environment Canada at Canadian Rivers Institute and Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
                University of Saskatchewan, CANADA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: NAF SS MH. Performed the experiments: NAF SS. Analyzed the data: NAF SS MH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DJB MH. Wrote the paper: NAF MH.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-15363
                10.1371/journal.pone.0157505
                4911152
                27310720
                dad15d07-a932-43aa-b536-347568997d50
                © 2016 Fahner et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 15 April 2016
                : 31 May 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008762, Genome Canada;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000039, Environment Canada;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000039, Environment Canada;
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by the Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada, NSERC, Environment Canada, Parks Canada.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Database and Informatics Methods
                Biological Databases
                Sequence Databases
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Sequencing Techniques
                Sequence Analysis
                Sequence Databases
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Sequencing Techniques
                Sequence Analysis
                Sequence Databases
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Plants
                Vascular Plants
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Taxonomy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Taxonomy
                Plant Taxonomy
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Data Management
                Taxonomy
                Plant Taxonomy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Taxonomy
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Data Management
                Taxonomy
                Biology and life sciences
                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology techniques
                DNA barcoding
                Research and analysis methods
                Molecular biology techniques
                DNA barcoding
                Biology and life sciences
                Evolutionary biology
                Evolutionary systematics
                Molecular systematics
                DNA barcoding
                Biology and life sciences
                Taxonomy
                Evolutionary systematics
                Molecular systematics
                DNA barcoding
                Computer and information sciences
                Data management
                Taxonomy
                Evolutionary systematics
                Molecular systematics
                DNA barcoding
                Biology and life sciences
                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology techniques
                Molecular biology assays and analysis techniques
                DNA filter assay
                Research and analysis methods
                Molecular biology techniques
                Molecular biology assays and analysis techniques
                DNA filter assay
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Database and Informatics Methods
                Database Searching
                Custom metadata
                All sequence data is deposited in NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (SRA Accession SRP073252) under BioProject PRJNA318025.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article