0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A gentler approach to monitor for heart transplant rejection

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite developments in circulating biomarker and imaging technology in the assessment of cardiovascular disease, the surveillance and diagnosis of heart transplant rejection has continued to rely on histopathologic interpretation of the endomyocardial biopsy. Increasing evidence shows the utility of molecular evaluations, such as donor-specific antibodies and donor-derived cell-free DNA, as well as advanced imaging techniques, such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, in the assessment of rejection, resulting in the elimination of many surveillance endomyocardial biopsies. As non-invasive technologies in heart transplant rejection continue to evolve and are incorporated into practice, they may supplant endomyocardial biopsy even when rejection is suspected, allowing for more precise and expeditious rejection therapy. This review describes the current and near-future states for the evaluation of heart transplant rejection, both in the settings of rejection surveillance and rejection diagnosis. As biomarkers of rejection continue to evolve, rejection risk prediction may allow for a more personalized approach to immunosuppression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.

          In 1990, an international grading system for cardiac allograft biopsies was adopted by the International Society for Heart Transplantation. This system has served the heart transplant community well, facilitating communication between transplant centers, especially with regard to patient management and research. In 2004, under the direction of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), a multidisciplinary review of the cardiac biopsy grading system was undertaken to address challenges and inconsistencies in its use and to address recent advances in the knowledge of antibody-mediated rejection. This article summarizes the revised consensus classification for cardiac allograft rejection. In brief, the revised (R) categories of cellular rejection are as follows: Grade 0 R--no rejection (no change from 1990); Grade 1 R--mild rejection (1990 Grades 1A, 1B and 2); Grade 2 R--moderate rejection (1990 Grade 3A); and Grade 3 R--severe rejection (1990 Grades 3B and 4). Because the histologic sub-types of Quilty A and Quilty B have never been shown to have clinical significance, the "A" and "B" designations have been eliminated. Recommendations are also made for the histologic recognition and immunohistologic investigation of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) with the expectation that greater standardization of the assessment of this controversial entity will clarify its clinical significance. Technical considerations in biopsy processing are also addressed. This consensus revision of the Working Formulation was approved by the ISHLT Board of Directors in December 2004.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-sixth Adult Heart Transplantation Report — 2019; Focus Theme: Donor and Recipient Size Match

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Circulating cell-free DNA enables noninvasive diagnosis of heart transplant rejection.

              Monitoring allograft health is an important component of posttransplant therapy. Endomyocardial biopsy is the current gold standard for cardiac allograft monitoring but is an expensive and invasive procedure. Proof of principle of a universal, noninvasive diagnostic method based on high-throughput screening of circulating cell-free donor-derived DNA (cfdDNA) was recently demonstrated in a small retrospective cohort. We present the results of a prospective cohort study (65 patients, 565 samples) that tested the utility of cfdDNA in measuring acute rejection after heart transplantation. Circulating cell-free DNA was purified from plasma and sequenced (mean depth, 1.2 giga-base pairs) to quantify the fraction of cfdDNA. Through a comparison with endomyocardial biopsy results, we demonstrate that cfdDNA enables diagnosis of acute rejection after heart transplantation, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 and sensitivity and specificity that are comparable to the intrinsic performance of the biopsy itself. This noninvasive genome transplant dynamics approach is a powerful and informative method for routine monitoring of allograft health without incurring the risk, discomfort, and expense of an invasive biopsy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1306066/overviewRole:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2624771/overviewRole:
                Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1414253/overviewRole:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2587585/overviewRole:
                Journal
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
                Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-055X
                06 February 2024
                2024
                : 11
                : 1349376
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute , Falls Church, VA, United States
                [ 2 ]Department of Children's Cardiology, Inova L.J. Murphy Children’s Hospital , Falls Church, VA, United States
                [ 3 ]Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, VA, United States
                [ 4 ]National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), NIH , Bethesda, MD, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Lauren Cooper, Northwell Health, United States

                Reviewed by: Marc Samsky, Yale University, United States

                Jasjit Bhinder, Northwell Health, United States

                [* ] Correspondence: Palak Shah palak.shah@ 123456inova.org

                Abbreviations ACR, acute cellular rejection; AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; CAV, cardiac allograft vasculopathy; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; dd-cfDNA, donor-derived cell-free DNA; DSA, donor-specific antibody; EMB, endomyocardial biopsy; GEP, gene expression profiling; GLS, global longitudinal strain; HLA, human leukocyte antigen.

                Article
                10.3389/fcvm.2024.1349376
                10876874
                38380175
                db4b9423-f3bb-4af0-8743-b55ba6aa026a
                © 2024 Goldberg, Mehta, Bahniwal, Agbor-Enoh and Shah.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 December 2023
                : 24 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 53, Pages: 0, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: SAE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Division of Intramural Research
                Award ID: HHSN268201300001C
                Funded by: PS: NIH K23 Career Development Award
                Award ID: 1K23HL143179
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
                SAE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Division of Intramural Research (HHSN268201300001C); PS: NIH K23 Career Development Award 1K23HL143179.
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Mini Review
                Custom metadata
                General Cardiovascular Medicine

                acute cellular rejection (acr),antibody-mediated rejection (amr),cardiac allograft vasculopathy (cav),cardiac magnetic resonance (cmr),donor-derived cell-free dna (dd-cfdna),donor-specific antibody (dsa),endomyocardial biopsy (emb),gene expression profiling (gep)

                Comments

                Comment on this article