Reflections after TWILIGHT study: a new era in secondary prevention without aspirin?

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is mandatory in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), but carries an increased bleeding risk which must be weighed over the expected antithrombotic benefit. In recent years, DAPT optimization strategy has been enriched by the concept of early withdrawal of aspirin (‘aspirin-free’ strategy). This strategy is supported by the modern advancements in pharmacological and procedural fields (i.e. the availability of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors with a concomitant ‘aspirin-like’ effect), the advocated use of pharmacological non-antiplatelet secondary prevention strategies (i.e. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, statins, beta-blockers), the use of modern stents and the increasingly widespread use of intra-coronary imaging techniques. In the last few years, five clinical trials (GLOBAL LEADERS, TWILIGHT, STOP-DAPT2, SMART CHOICE, TICO) and their own meta-analysis have been followed, aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different ‘aspirin-free’ strategies. They showed that aspirin withdrawal (1–3 months after PCI), determines a consistent reduction of bleeding risk, without compromising efficacy endpoints. It resulted in a class IIa indication in the 2020 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation, which suggested the early withdrawal of aspirin in patients undergoing PCI and considered to be at low ischaemic and low bleeding risk, or at high bleeding risk.