7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Larotrectinib versus Prior Therapies in Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase Fusion Cancer: An Intra-Patient Comparative Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Clinical trials for new drugs to treat rare diseases are difficult to evaluate due to the limited patient population available for recruitment. Growth modulation index (GMI) is a very useful tool in these instances, as this calculation compares the patient’s outcome on the current drug to the same patient’s outcome on their most recent prior therapy, using the patient as their own control. GMI is the ratio of progression-free survival on the current therapy to time to progression on the last prior line of therapy and offers a method to determine if the investigational drug provides a benefit compared to the patient’s last prior treatment. Using a GMI ≥ 1.33 as the threshold of meaningful clinical activity, we found that larotrectinib, a tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor approved to treat patients with TRK fusion cancer, improves progression-free survival for most patients with TRK fusion cancer compared with prior therapy.

          Abstract

          Randomized controlled basket trials investigating drugs targeting a rare molecular alteration are challenging. Using patients as their own control overcomes some of these challenges. Growth modulation index (GMI) is the ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) on the current therapy to time to progression (TTP) on the last prior line of therapy; GMI ≥ 1.33 is considered a threshold of meaningful clinical activity. In a retrospective, exploratory analysis among patients with advanced tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion cancer treated with the selective TRK inhibitor larotrectinib who received ≥1 prior line of therapy for locally advanced/metastatic disease, we determined the proportion of patients with GMI ≥ 1.33; patients who had not progressed by data cut-off were censored for PFS. Among 72 eligible patients, median GMI was 2.68 (range 0.01–48.75). Forty-seven patients (65%) had GMI ≥ 1.33; 13/25 patients (52%) with GMI < 1.33 had not yet progressed on larotrectinib. Kaplan–Meier estimates showed a median GMI of 6.46. The probability of attaining GMI ≥ 1.33 was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.65–0.85). Median TTP on previous treatment was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.6–4.4). Median PFS on larotrectinib was not estimable ((NE); 95% CI, NE; hazard ratio, 0.220 (95% CI, 0.146–0.332)). This analysis suggests larotrectinib improves PFS for patients with TRK fusion cancer compared with prior therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments

          Propensity score methods are increasingly being used to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. In medical and epidemiological studies, outcomes are frequently time-to-event in nature. Propensity-score methods are often applied incorrectly when estimating the effect of treatment on time-to-event outcomes. This article describes how two different propensity score methods (matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting) can be used to estimate the measures of effect that are frequently reported in randomized controlled trials: (i) marginal survival curves, which describe survival in the population if all subjects were treated or if all subjects were untreated; and (ii) marginal hazard ratios. The use of these propensity score methods allows one to replicate the measures of effect that are commonly reported in randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: both absolute and relative reductions in the probability of an event occurring can be determined. We also provide guidance on variable selection for the propensity score model, highlight methods for assessing the balance of baseline covariates between treated and untreated subjects, and describe the implementation of a sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of unmeasured confounding variables on the estimated treatment effect when outcomes are time-to-event in nature. The methods in the paper are illustrated by estimating the effect of discharge statin prescribing on the risk of death in a sample of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. In this tutorial article, we describe and illustrate all the steps necessary to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the effect of treatment on time-to-event outcomes. © 2013 The authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours: a pooled analysis of three phase 1/2 clinical trials

            Background The selective TRK inhibitor larotrectinib was approved for paediatric and adult patients with advanced TRK fusion-positive solid tumours based on a primary analysis set of 55 patients. The aim of our analysis was to explore the efficacy and long-term safety of larotrectinib in a larger population of patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours. Methods Patients were enrolled and treated in a phase 1 adult, a phase 1/2 paediatric, or a phase 2 adolescent and adult trial. Some eligibility criteria differed between these studies. For this pooled analysis, eligible patients were aged 1 month or older, with a locally advanced or metastatic non-CNS primary, TRK fusion-positive solid tumour, who had received standard therapy previously if available. This analysis set includes the 55 patients on which approval of larotrectinib was based. Larotrectinib was administered orally (capsule or liquid formulation), on a continuous 28-day schedule, to adults mostly at a dose of 100 mg twice daily, and to paediatric patients mostly at a dose of 100 mg/m 2 (maximum of 100 mg) twice daily. The primary endpoint was objective response as assessed by local investigators in an intention-to-treat analysis. Contributing trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02122913 (active not recruiting), NCT02637687 (recruiting), and NCT02576431 (recruiting). Findings Between May 1, 2014, and Feb 19, 2019, 159 patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer were enrolled and treated with larotrectinib. Ages ranged from less than 1 month to 84 years. The proportion of patients with an objective response according to investigator assessment was 121 (79%, 95% CI 72–85) of 153 evaluable patients, with 24 (16%) having complete responses. In a safety population of 260 patients treated regardless of TRK fusion status, the most common grade 3 or 4 larotrectinib-related adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase (eight [3%] of 260 patients), anaemia (six, 2%), and decreased neutrophil count (five [2%]). The most common larotrectinib-related serious adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase (two [<1%] of 260 patients), increased aspartate aminotransferase (two [<1%]), and nausea (two [<1%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Interpretation These data confirm that TRK fusions define a unique molecular subgroup of advanced solid tumours for which larotrectinib is highly active. Safety data indicate that long-term administration of larotrectinib is feasible. Funding Bayer and Loxo Oncology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              TRKing down an old oncogene in a new era of targeted therapy.

              The use of high-throughput next-generation sequencing techniques in multiple tumor types during the last few years has identified NTRK1, 2, and 3 gene rearrangements encoding novel oncogenic fusions in 19 different tumor types to date. These recent developments have led us to revisit an old oncogene, Trk (originally identified as OncD), which encodes the TPM3-NTRK1 gene fusion and was one of the first transforming chromosomal rearrangements identified 32 years ago. However, no drug has yet been approved by the FDA for cancers harboring this oncogene. This review will discuss the biology of the TRK family of receptors, their role in human cancer, the types of oncogenic alterations, and drugs that are currently in development for this family of oncogene targets.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                04 November 2020
                November 2020
                : 12
                : 11
                : 3246
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Early Phase Trials Unit, Institut Bergonie, 33000 Bordeaux, France
                [2 ]University of Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
                [3 ]Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Whippany, NJ 07981, USA; shivanin@ 123456hmplglobal.com (S.N.); karen.keating@ 123456bayer.com (K.K.); john.reeves.ext@ 123456bayer.com (J.A.R.); marc.fellous@ 123456bayer.com (M.F.); barry.childs@ 123456bayer.com (B.H.C.)
                [4 ]London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Andrew.Briggs@ 123456lshtm.ac.uk
                [5 ]OncoHealth Institute, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040 Madrid, Spain; jgfoncillas@ 123456quironsalud.es
                [6 ]Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; ulrik.lassen@ 123456regionh.dk
                [7 ]Institut Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif Cedex, France; Gilles.Vassal@ 123456gustaveroussy.fr
                [8 ]Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; kummar@ 123456ohsu.edu
                [9 ]Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; cornelis.vantilburg@ 123456kitz-heidelberg.de
                [10 ]Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; dshong@ 123456mdanderson.org
                [11 ]Department of Pediatrics and Harold C, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center/Children’s Health, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; LAETSCHT@ 123456chop.edu
                [12 ]Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; drilona@ 123456mskcc.org (A.D.); dhyman@ 123456loxooncology.com (D.M.H.)
                [13 ]Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: A.Italiano@ 123456bordeaux.unicancer.fr ; Tel.: +33-5-47-30-60-88
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this report.

                [‡]

                Current Address: Hutchison MediPharma International, New Jersey, NJ 07932, USA.

                [§]

                Current Address: Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97210, USA.

                [‖]

                Current Address: The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

                [¶]

                Current Address: Loxo Oncology, Inc, Stamford, CT 06901, USA.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3865-4574
                Article
                cancers-12-03246
                10.3390/cancers12113246
                7692104
                33158040
                dbe39f6d-f1d3-45f0-8d1f-ef6a103eaa28
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 August 2020
                : 25 October 2020
                Categories
                Article

                growth modulation index,larotrectinib,ntrk gene fusion,tropomyosin receptor kinase,trk fusion cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article