9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sickness absence after carpal tunnel release: a multicentre prospective cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To describe when patients return to different types of work after elective carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery and identify the factors associated with the duration of sickness absence.

          Design

          Multicentre prospective observational cohort study.

          Setting and participants

          Participants were recruited preoperatively from 16 UK centres and clinical, occupational and demographic information were collected. Participants completed a weekly diary and questionnaires at four and 12 weeks postoperatively.

          Outcomes

          The main outcome was duration of work absence from date of surgery to date of first return to work.

          Results

          254 participants were enrolled in the study and 201 provided the follow-up data. Median duration of sickness absence was 20 days (range 1–99). Earlier return to work was associated with having surgery in primary care and a self-reported work role involving more than 4 hours of daily computer use. Being female and entitlement to more than a month of paid sick leave were both associated with longer work absences. The duration of work absence was strongly associated with the expected duration of leave, as reported by participants before surgery. Earlier return to work was not associated with poorer clinical outcomes reported 12 weeks after CTR.

          Conclusions

          There was wide variation in the duration of work absence after CTR across all occupational categories. A combination of occupational, demographic and clinical factors was associated with the duration of work absence, illustrating the complexity of return to work decision making. However, preoperative expectations were strongly associated with the actual duration of leave. We found no evidence that earlier return to work was harmful. Clear, consistent advice from clinicians preoperatively setting expectations of a prompt return to work could reduce unnecessary sickness absence after CTR. To enable this, clinicians need evidence-informed guidance about appropriate timescales for the safe return to different types of work.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

          A 36-item short-form (SF-36) was constructed to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. The survey was constructed for self-administration by persons 14 years of age and older, and for administration by a trained interviewer in person or by telephone. The history of the development of the SF-36, the origin of specific items, and the logic underlying their selection are summarized. The content and features of the SF-36 are compared with the 20-item Medical Outcomes Study short-form.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics.

            Part I discusses the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), designed to measure scales assessing psychological demands, decision latitude, social support, physical demands, and job insecurity. Part II describes the reliability of the JCQ scales in a cross-national context using 10,288 men and 6,313 women from 6 studies conducted in 4 countries. Substantial similarity in means, standard deviations, and correlations among the scales, and in correlations between scales and demographic variables, is found for both men and women in all studies. Reliability is good for most scales. Results suggest that psychological job characteristics are more similar across national boundaries than across occupations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews

              Background Work disability is a major personal, financial and public health burden. Predicting future work success is a major focus of research. Objectives To identify common prognostic factors for return-to-work across different health and injury conditions and to describe their association with return-to-work outcomes. Methods Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Cinahl, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the grey literature were searched from January 1, 2004 to September 1, 2013. Systematic reviews addressing return-to-work in various conditions and injuries were selected. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria to identify low risk of bias reviews. Results Of the 36,193 titles screened and the 94 eligible studies reviewed, 56 systematic reviews were accepted as low risk of bias. Over half of these focused on musculoskeletal disorders, which were primarily spine related (e.g., neck and low back pain). The other half of studies assessed workers with mental health or cardiovascular conditions, stroke, cancer, multiple sclerosis or other non-specified health conditions. Many factors have been assessed, but few consistently across conditions. Common factors associated with positive return-to-work outcomes were higher education and socioeconomic status, higher self-efficacy and optimistic expectations for recovery and return-to-work, lower severity of the injury/illness, return-to-work coordination, and multidisciplinary interventions that include the workplace and stakeholders. Common factors associated with negative return-to-work outcomes were older age, being female, higher pain or disability, depression, higher physical work demands, previous sick leave and unemployment, and activity limitations. Conclusions Expectations of recovery and return-to-work, pain and disability levels, depression, workplace factors, and access to multidisciplinary resources are important modifiable factors in progressing return-to-work across health and injury conditions. Employers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders can use this information to facilitate return-to-work for injured/ill workers regardless of the specific injury or illness. Future studies should investigate novel interventions, and other factors that may be common across health conditions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                10 February 2021
                : 11
                : 2
                : e041656
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentMRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit , University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
                [2 ]departmentHand Therapy , Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
                [3 ]departmentHand Surgery , University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
                [4 ]departmentCentre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis , University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
                [5 ]departmentCentre for Innovation and Leadership in Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences , University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Lisa Newington; l.newington@ 123456nhs.net
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6954-2981
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7481-6860
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-442X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-7060
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-1459
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-041656
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041656
                7878133
                33568370
                dc27c3ca-5c9b-4fb6-90a5-c44ba325ffc6
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 June 2020
                : 18 January 2021
                : 19 January 2021
                Categories
                Surgery
                1506
                1737
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                hand & wrist,primary care,occupational & industrial medicine
                Medicine
                hand & wrist, primary care, occupational & industrial medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article