Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
119
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      EGFR and K-Ras mutations in women with lung adenocarcinoma: implications for treatment strategy definition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We aimed at investigating the outcomes of female patients with stage IIIB-IV adenocarcinoma of the lung according to EGFR and K-Ras mutational status.

          Methods

          One hundred and three consecutive female patients genotyped at a single Italian Institution were analyzed. Patients were planned to receive first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) and a salvage treatment with anti-EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was proposed irrespective of tumor mutational status. EGFR (exons 18–21) and K-Ras (exon 2, codons 12–13) mutations were evaluated by real-time PCR and pyrosequencing. The association of mutational status with clinical variables and treatment benefit was investigated by chi-square test and log-rank test.

          Results

          EGFR and K-Ras mutations were found in 31 (30%) and 13 (15%) cases, respectively. Sixty-six patients received platinum CT: no correlation was observed between EGFR or K-Ras mutational status and response rate (RR) (p > 0.05). However, patients treated with first-line CT harboring EGFR activating mutations experienced a significantly reduced progression-free survival (PFS) in comparison with wild-type ones (4.4 vs. 6.4 months, respectively; HR 0.597, 95% CI 0.287-0.975; p = 0.048). Thirty-nine patients received salvage treatment with erlotinib: EGFR activating mutations were significantly correlated with RR (60% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.004) and PFS (11.4 vs. 4.5 months; HR 0.491, 95% CI 0.216-0.936; p = 0.044). Responses to erlotinib were not reported among women with K-Ras mutant tumors, while 50% of those with wild-type K-Ras achieved an objective remission (p = 0.296). Median PFS (3.5 vs. 8.8 months; HR 0.284, 95% CI 0.015-0.510; p = 0.010) and OS (3.9 vs. 19.8 months; HR 0.158, 95% CI 0.001-0.075; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter among K-Ras mutant patients treated with TKI.

          Conclusions

          In our population of Caucasian women with advanced lung adenocarcinoma we observed that the presence of EGFR activating mutations correlates with a significant reduction in the benefit from first-line platinum-based CT, emphasizing the importance of an upfront use of anti-EGFR TKIs in this patient subset. K-Ras mutations seem to correlate with a detrimental effect from anti-EGFR TKI, but this finding deserves further investigation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.

          Somatic mutations of the k-RAS oncogene have been assessed as a mechanism of de-novo resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibition in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess if k-RAS mutations represent a candidate predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR-targeted therapeutic strategies in mCRC and NSCLC. We systematically identified articles pertaining to k-RAS mutational status in patients with NSCLC treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI), and patients with mCRC treated with any anti-EGFR-based regimens. Eligible studies had to report complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR), stratified by k-RAS mutational status. Potential between-study heterogeneity was accommodated by use of random-effects models for bivariable meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity (the primary endpoints). The positive and negative likelihood ratios (+LR and -LR, respectively) of k-RAS mutations for predicting an absence of response were considered as secondary endpoints and were calculated by use of pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity. Of 252 retrieved manuscripts, 17 were deemed eligible for the NSCLC meta-analysis (165 of 1008 patients with mutated k-RAS). The presence of k-RAS mutations was significantly associated with an absence of response to TKIs (sensitivity=0.21 [95% CI 0.16-0.28], specificity=0.94 [0.89-0.97]; +LR=3.52; -LR=0.84). Of 68 retrieved manuscripts reporting on anti-EGFR monoclonal-antibody-based treatment of mCRC, eight studies were deemed eligible for the final analysis (306 of 817 patients with mutated k-RAS). The presence of k-RAS mutations was significantly associated with an absence of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal-antibody-based treatments (sensitivity=0.47 [0.43-0.52]; specificity=0.93 [0.83-0.97]; +LR=6.82; -LR=0.57). This analysis provides empirical evidence that k-RAS mutations are highly specific negative predictors of response (de-novo resistance) to single-agent EGFR TKIs in advanced NSCLC; and similarly to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies alone or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with mCRC. The low sensitivity and relatively high -LR of k-RAS mutations for determining non-responsiveness clearly shows that additional mechanisms of resistance to EGFR inhibitors exist.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            KRAS mutations and resistance to EGFR-TKIs treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 22 studies.

            Epidemiologic studies have evaluated the association between KRAS mutations and resistance to the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, results were inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, we performed this meta-analysis. Systematic computerized searches of the PubMed and Medline databases (up to Jun 30, 2009) were performed. A total of 22 studies were included in the final meta-analysis, consisting of 1470 NSCLC patients, of whom 231 had KRAS mutations (16%). Current or former smokers had a higher frequency of KRAS mutations than never smokers (25% versus 6%; OR=4.36; P<0.01). Mutations were more common among adenocarcinoma than other histologies (26% versus 16%; OR=1.98; P<0.01). The objective response rate (ORR) of NSCLC patients with mutant KRAS was 3% (6/210), whereas the ORR of NSCLC patients with wild-type KRAS was 26% (287/1125). The overall pooled RR for ORR was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.18-0.47; P<0.01). Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of ethnicity and study treatment, all the results were not materially altered and did not draw different conclusions, indicating that our results were robust. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that KRAS mutations may represent negative predictive biomarkers for tumor response in NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. However, due to a mutually exclusive relationship between KRAS and EGFR mutation and no difference in survival between KRAS mutant/EGFR wild-type and KRAS wild-type/EGFR wild-type NSCLC, the clinical usefulness of KRAS mutation as a selection marker for EGFR-TKIs sensitivity in NSCLC is limited. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The molecular pathology of cancer.

              Rapid technical advances in DNA sequencing and genome-wide association studies are driving the discovery of the germline and somatic mutations that are present in different cancers. Mutations in genes involved in cellular signaling are common, and often shared by tumors that arise in distinct anatomical locations. Here we review the most important molecular changes in different cancers from the perspective of what should be analyzed on a routine basis in the clinic. The paradigms are EGFR mutations in adenocarcinoma of the lung that can be treated with gefitinib, KRAS mutations in colon cancer with respect to treatment with EGFR antibodies, and the use of gene-expression analysis for ER-positive, node-negative breast cancer patients with respect to chemotherapy options. Several other examples in both solid and hematological cancers are also provided. We focus on how disease subtypes can influence therapy and discuss the implications of the impending molecular diagnostic revolution from the point of view of the patients, clinicians, and the diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies. This paradigm shift is occurring first in cancer patient management and is likely to promote the application of these technologies to other diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                v.rotella@usl2.toscana.it
                lorenzo.fornaro@gmail.com
                envasile@tin.it
                tiby@katamail.com
                l.boldrini@med.unipi.it
                anto.kell@tiscali.it
                armibru@gmail.com
                g.cirigliano@usl2.toscana.it
                a.chioni@usl9.toscana.it
                cristianalupi@libero.it
                e.sensi@med.unipi.it
                lauraginocchi@hotmail.it
                s.giovannelli@usl2.toscana.it
                cripen62@yahoo.it
                gabriella.fontanini@med.unipi.it
                e.baldini@usl2.toscana.it
                Journal
                J Exp Clin Cancer Res
                J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res
                Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR
                BioMed Central (London )
                0392-9078
                1756-9966
                11 October 2014
                11 October 2014
                2014
                : 33
                : 1
                : 77
                Affiliations
                [ ]U.O. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale San Luca, Lucca, Italy
                [ ]U.O. Oncologia Medica 2 Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
                [ ]U.O. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Civile, Livorno, Italy
                [ ]Dipartimento di Patologia Chirurgica, Medica, Molecolare e di Area Critica, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
                [ ]U.O. Pneumologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
                [ ]U.O. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale della Misericordia, Grosseto, Italy
                [ ]U.O. Anatomia Patologica III, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
                [ ]U.O. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale di Carrara, Carrara, Italy
                Article
                77
                10.1186/s13046-014-0077-6
                4198726
                25300933
                dca3c4a6-4ea5-4351-9865-3bc48fc2deb6
                © Rotella et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 6 September 2014
                : 8 September 2014
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                lung adenocarcinoma,egfr,k-ras,chemotherapy,tyrosine-kinase inhibitors
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                lung adenocarcinoma, egfr, k-ras, chemotherapy, tyrosine-kinase inhibitors

                Comments

                Comment on this article