0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Benefits and safety of Oxymetazoline cream 1% on rosacea‐associated erythema: A systematic review and analysis of clinical evidence

      1 , 2
      Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Facial persistent erythema is recognized as difficult feature to treat in rosacea. Topical Oxymetazoline cream 1% has been used to treat persistent facial erythema in rosacea patients for some years.

          Objective

          To quantitatively synthesize the benefits and harms of Oxymetazoline cream 1% in real‐world clinical management of treatment response and adverse events.

          Methods

          The clinical researches before June 1, 2022 published on online databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were meta‐analyzed.

          Results

          A total of 2298 participants were included, and the improvement rate of two‐grade Clinician Erythema Assessment score (CEA) and Subject Self‐Assessment for rosacea facial redness score (SSA) in Oxymetazoline group was 38% (95%CI 28–48) and 25% (95%CI 22–27), respectively, at the 4th week of the dosing. The comprehensive rate of treatment‐related TEAEs in Oxymetazoline group was 7% (95%CI 5–8). The rate of stinging/burning was 15% (95%CI 10–19), pruritus was 15% (95%CI 9–22), dryness was 23% (95%CI 18–28), and scaling was 17% (95%CI 12–22) in analysis of dermal tolerability. And topical Oxymetazoline cream 1.0% presented a very low rebound rate of erythema (1%, 95%CI 0–2).

          Conclusions

          These real‐world data on Oxymetazoline cream 1% in rosacea‐associated erythema may help making clinic decision and informing treatment expectations, and more clinic trials on longer‐term dosing or the combination treatment with oral medication and energy‐based therapy are worth exploring.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

            Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
                J of Cosmetic Dermatology
                Wiley
                1473-2130
                1473-2165
                January 2023
                October 24 2022
                January 2023
                : 22
                : 1
                : 103-110
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Dermatology Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital Guiyang China
                [2 ] College of Medical Humanitles Guizhou Medical University Guiyang China
                Article
                10.1111/jocd.15467
                36237138
                dd1dc43b-a86c-4d61-9520-c4c6443a80bf
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article