3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Prognostic Significance of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Adult Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          This study aimed to evaluate the oncological and prognostic significance of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in patients with adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary (AOGCT).

          Methods

          We searched the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Clinical Trials, Wanfang Database, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE electronic databases for articles published up to May 2023. Reference lists of the enrolled studies, Google Scholar, and scientific meeting reports were also manually searched.

          Results

          We enrolled 5641 patients with AOGCT from 33 eligible studies, including 1674 (29.7%) and 3967 (70.3%) patients in the CT and non-CT groups, respectively. Based on the cumulative results, adjuvant CT did not affect the risk of recurrence or progression (R/P) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–2.78, I 2 = 63%, P = .05) and 5-year overall survival (OR: .86, 95% CI: .70–1.04, I 2 = 0%, P = .12) of patients with AOGCT. However, adjuvant CT might reduce the 5-year disease-free survival (OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.19–7.08, I 2 = 55%, P = .02). Sub-group analysis revealed that adjuvant CT did not affect the risk of R/P in patients with early-stage AOGCT (OR: .78, 95% CI: .43–1.43, I 2 = 2%, P = .43) and advanced or recurrent AOGCT (OR: .78, 95% CI: .43–1.43, I 2 = 2%, P = .43).

          Conclusion

          This meta-analysis suggests that patients with AOGCT might not benefit from adjuvant CT, even those with advanced or recurrent disease. The results should be interpreted with caution because of the inherent limitations of retrospective studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee.

            The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) were developed and published in 2000, based on the original World Health Organisation guidelines first published in 1981. In 2009, revisions were made (RECIST 1.1) incorporating major changes, including a reduction in the number of lesions to be assessed, a new measurement method to classify lymph nodes as pathologic or normal, the clarification of the requirement to confirm a complete response or partial response and new methodologies for more appropriate measurement of disease progression. The purpose of this paper was to summarise the questions posed and the clarifications provided as an update to the 2009 publication.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

              The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancer Control
                Cancer Control
                spccx
                CCX
                Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                1073-2748
                1526-2359
                13 November 2023
                Jan-Dec 2023
                : 30
                : 10732748231215165
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Gynecology, Ringgold 625777, universityThe Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University; , Zhuhai, China
                Author notes
                [*]Hua Yang, MD, Department of Gynecology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 52 Meihua East Road, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, China. Email: yangh353@ 123456mail.sysu.edu.cn
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-8104
                Article
                10.1177_10732748231215165
                10.1177/10732748231215165
                10644757
                37957122
                df9134d8-8ef8-4690-9438-a078bd00c555
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 2 June 2023
                : 1 October 2023
                : 31 October 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: This work was supported by the Medical Science and Technology Research Foundation of Guangdong Province;
                Award ID: A2022317
                Categories
                An Inventory of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Targets: “Evidence-based” Options
                Review
                Custom metadata
                ts10
                January-December 2023

                adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary,chemotherapy,recurrence or progression,overall survival,disease-free survival,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article