18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Elytra reduction may affect the evolution of beetle hind wings

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 2
      Zoomorphology
      Springer Berlin Heidelberg
      Beetle, Elytra, Evolution, Wings, Homoplasy, Brachelytry

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Beetles are one of the largest and most diverse groups of animals in the world. Conversion of forewings into hardened shields is perceived as a key adaptation that has greatly supported the evolutionary success of this taxa. Beetle elytra play an essential role: they minimize the influence of unfavorable external factors and protect insects against predators. Therefore, it is particularly interesting why some beetles have reduced their shields. This rare phenomenon is called brachelytry and its evolution and implications remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we focused on rare group of brachelytrous beetles with exposed hind wings. We have investigated whether the elytra loss in different beetle taxa is accompanied with the hind wing shape modification, and whether these changes are similar among unrelated beetle taxa. We found that hind wings shape differ markedly between related brachelytrous and macroelytrous beetles. Moreover, we revealed that modifications of hind wings have followed similar patterns and resulted in homoplasy in this trait among some unrelated groups of wing-exposed brachelytrous beetles. Our results suggest that elytra reduction may affect the evolution of beetle hind wings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comprehensive phylogeny of beetles reveals the evolutionary origins of a superradiation.

          Beetles represent almost one-fourth of all described species, and knowledge about their relationships and evolution adds to our understanding of biodiversity. We performed a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Coleoptera inferred from three genes and nearly 1900 species, representing more than 80% of the world's recognized beetle families. We defined basal relationships in the Polyphaga supergroup, which contains over 300,000 species, and established five families as the earliest branching lineages. By dating the phylogeny, we found that the success of beetles is explained neither by exceptional net diversification rates nor by a predominant role of herbivory and the Cretaceous rise of angiosperms. Instead, the pre-Cretaceous origin of more than 100 present-day lineages suggests that beetle species richness is due to high survival of lineages and sustained diversification in a variety of niches.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation.

            Over the last decade, geometric morphometric methods have been applied increasingly to the study of human form. When too few landmarks are available, outlines can be digitized as series of discrete points. The individual points must be slid along a tangential direction so as to remove tangential variation, because contours should be homologous from subject to subject whereas their individual points need not. This variation can be removed by minimizing either bending energy (BE) or Procrustes distance (D) with respect to a mean reference form. Because these two criteria make different assumptions, it becomes necessary to study how these differences modify the results obtained. We performed bootstrapped-based Goodall's F-test, Foote's measurement, principal component (PC) and discriminant function analyses on human molars and craniometric data to compare the results obtained by the two criteria. Results show that: (1) F-scores and P-values were similar for both criteria; (2) results of Foote's measurement show that both criteria yield different estimates of within- and between-sample variation; (3) there is low correlation between the first PC axes obtained by D and BE; (4) the percentage of correct classification is similar for BE and D, but the ordination of groups along discriminant scores differs between them. The differences between criteria can alter the results when morphological variation in the sample is small, as in the analysis of modern human populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evolution and Classification of Beetles

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +48 12 662 53-26 , j.goczal@wp.pl
                Journal
                Zoomorphology
                Zoomorphology
                Zoomorphology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0720-213X
                1432-234X
                18 November 2017
                18 November 2017
                2018
                : 137
                : 1
                : 131-138
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2150 7124, GRID grid.410701.3, Institute of Forest Ecosystem Protection, Faculty of Forestry, , University of Agriculture in Krakow, ; 29 Listopada 46, 31-425, Krakow, Poland
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2150 7124, GRID grid.410701.3, Department of Pomology and Apiculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, , University of Agriculture in Krakow, ; 29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Krakow, Poland
                Article
                388
                10.1007/s00435-017-0388-1
                5847043
                29568156
                e00b9eb2-3831-4ea4-a4c3-74d9cc5b3c45
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 21 July 2017
                : 31 October 2017
                : 14 November 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004569, Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego;
                Award ID: DS-3500/2017
                Award ID: DS-3414/2017
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

                Animal science & Zoology
                beetle,elytra,evolution,wings,homoplasy,brachelytry
                Animal science & Zoology
                beetle, elytra, evolution, wings, homoplasy, brachelytry

                Comments

                Comment on this article