0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Distributed representations of prediction error signals across the cortical hierarchy are synergistic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A relevant question concerning inter-areal communication in the cortex is whether these interactions are synergistic. Synergy refers to the complementary effect of multiple brain signals conveying more information than the sum of each isolated signal. Redundancy, on the other hand, refers to the common information shared between brain signals. Here, we dissociated cortical interactions encoding complementary information (synergy) from those sharing common information (redundancy) during prediction error (PE) processing. We analyzed auditory and frontal electrocorticography (ECoG) signals in five common awake marmosets performing two distinct auditory oddball tasks and investigated to what extent event-related potentials (ERP) and broadband (BB) dynamics encoded synergistic and redundant information about PE processing. The information conveyed by ERPs and BB signals was synergistic even at lower stages of the hierarchy in the auditory cortex and between auditory and frontal regions. Using a brain-constrained neural network, we simulated the synergy and redundancy observed in the experimental results and demonstrated that the emergence of synergy between auditory and frontal regions requires the presence of strong, long-distance, feedback, and feedforward connections. These results indicate that distributed representations of PE signals across the cortical hierarchy can be highly synergistic.

          Abstract

          Whether prediction errors are encoded by synergistic information across the cortex is unknown. Here, the authors demonstrate that distributed representations of prediction errors across the cortex can be highly synergistic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects.

          We describe a model of visual processing in which feedback connections from a higher- to a lower-order visual cortical area carry predictions of lower-level neural activities, whereas the feedforward connections carry the residual errors between the predictions and the actual lower-level activities. When exposed to natural images, a hierarchical network of model neurons implementing such a model developed simple-cell-like receptive fields. A subset of neurons responsible for carrying the residual errors showed endstopping and other extra-classical receptive-field effects. These results suggest that rather than being exclusively feedforward phenomena, nonclassical surround effects in the visual cortex may also result from cortico-cortical feedback as a consequence of the visual system using an efficient hierarchical strategy for encoding natural images.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neuronal circuits of the neocortex.

            We explore the extent to which neocortical circuits generalize, i.e., to what extent can neocortical neurons and the circuits they form be considered as canonical? We find that, as has long been suspected by cortical neuroanatomists, the same basic laminar and tangential organization of the excitatory neurons of the neocortex is evident wherever it has been sought. Similarly, the inhibitory neurons show characteristic morphology and patterns of connections throughout the neocortex. We offer a simple model of cortical processing that is consistent with the major features of cortical circuits: The superficial layer neurons within local patches of cortex, and within areas, cooperate to explore all possible interpretations of different cortical input and cooperatively select an interpretation consistent with their various cortical and subcortical inputs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method.

              Parsing a cognitive task into a sequence of operations is a central problem in cognitive neuroscience. We argue that a major advance is now possible owing to the application of pattern classifiers to time-resolved recordings of brain activity [electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), or intracranial recordings]. By testing at which moment a specific mental content becomes decodable in brain activity, we can characterize the time course of cognitive codes. Most importantly, the manner in which the trained classifiers generalize across time, and from one experimental condition to another, sheds light on the temporal organization of information-processing stages. A repertoire of canonical dynamical patterns is observed across various experiments and brain regions. This method thus provides a novel way to understand how mental representations are manipulated and transformed. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                martin.vinck@esi-frankfurt.de
                afc37@cam.ac.uk
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                10 May 2024
                10 May 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 3941
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, ( https://ror.org/04dkp9463) Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, 1018 WT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, ( https://ror.org/013meh722) CB2 3EB Cambridge, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.4464.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2161 2573, Department of Computing, Goldsmiths, , University of London, ; SE14 6NW London, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.474690.8, Laboratory for Haptic Perception and Cognitive Physiology, , RIKEN Brain Science Institute, ; Saitama, 351-0198 Japan
                [5 ]Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, ( https://ror.org/00ygt2y02) 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
                [6 ]Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroinformatics, Radboud University Nijmegen, ( https://ror.org/016xsfp80) 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [7 ]Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, ( https://ror.org/02qp3tb03) Rochester, MN 55905 USA
                [8 ]School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, ( https://ror.org/00vtgdb53) Glasgow, G12 8QB Scotland, UK
                [9 ]Brain Language Lab, Freie Universität Berlin, ( https://ror.org/046ak2485) 14195 Berlin, Germany
                [10 ]Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neurosciences Research Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, ( https://ror.org/04vdpck27) 3460000 Talca, Chile
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-4484
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-7244
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8427-0507
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2104-1074
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2747-8894
                Article
                48329
                10.1038/s41467-024-48329-7
                11087548
                38729937
                e0a4f195-ab0d-411d-ae48-761e595eacbc
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 12 July 2023
                : 26 April 2024
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                neuroscience,physiology
                Uncategorized
                neuroscience, physiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article