Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access
      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          to identify the prevalence of suicidal behavior in young university students.

          Method:

          a systematic review with meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies based on the Joanna Briggs Institute proposal, and carried out in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and LILACS databases and in the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, with no language or year restrictions. A total of 2,942 publications were identified. Selection, data extraction and methodological evaluation of the studies were performed by two independent researchers. The meta-analysis was performed considering the random effects model.

          Results:

          eleven articles were included in this review. The prevalence variation for suicidal ideation was from 9.7% to 58.3% and, for attempted suicide, it was from 0.7% to 14.7%. The meta-analysis showed a 27.1% prevalence for suicidal ideation in life, 14.1% for ideation in the last year, and 3.1% for attempted suicide in life.

          Conclusion:

          the high prevalence of suicidal behavior, even with the considerable heterogeneity of the studies, raises the need to implement interventions aimed at preventing suicide and promoting mental health, especially in the academic environment.

          Translated abstract

          Objetivo:

          identificar la prevalencia de conductas suicidas en jóvenes universitarios.

          Método:

          revisión sistemática con metaanálisis de estudios transversales realizados a partir de la propuesta del Joanna Briggs Institute, en las bases de datos PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, LILACS y Biblioteca Digital Brasileña de Tesis y Disertaciones, sin limitaciones de idioma ni año. Se identificaron 2.942 publicaciones. La selección, la extracción de los datos y la evaluación metodológica de los estudios fueron realizadas por dos investigadores independientes. El metaanálisis se realizó considerando el modelo de efectos aleatorios.

          Resultados:

          se incluyeron once artículos en esta revisión. La variación de la prevalencia de ideación suicida fue del 9,7% al 58,3% y la del intento de suicidio fue del 0,7% al 14,7%. El metaanálisis mostró una prevalencia del 27,1% para la ideación suicida a lo largo de la vida, del 14,1% para la ideación en el último año y del 3,1% para el intento de suicidio a lo largo de la vida.

          Conclusión:

          la alta prevalencia de conducta suicida, a pesar de la considerable heterogeneidad de los estudios, plantea la necesidad de implementar intervenciones dirigidas a prevenir el suicidio y promover la salud mental, especialmente en el ámbito académico.

          Translated abstract

          Objetivo:

          identificar a prevalência do comportamento suicida em jovens universitários.

          Método:

          revisão sistemática com metanálise de estudos transversais realizada a partir da proposta do Joanna Briggs Institute, nas bases de dados PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, LILACS e Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações, sem restrição de idioma e ano. Foram identificadas 2.942 publicações. Seleção, extração dos dados e avaliação metodológica dos estudos foram realizadas por dois pesquisadores independentes. A metanálise foi realizada considerando o modelo de efeitos randômicos.

          Resultados:

          onze artigos foram incluídos nesta revisão. A variação da prevalência da ideação suicida foi de 9,7% a 58,3% e da tentativa de suicídio foi de 0,7% a 14,7%. A metanálise demonstrou prevalência de 27,1% para ideação suicida na vida, 14,1% para ideação no último ano e 3,1% para tentativa de suicídio na vida.

          Conclusão:

          a alta prevalência do comportamento suicida, mesmo diante da considerável heterogeneidade dos estudos, desperta a necessidade de implementação de intervenções voltadas para prevenção do suicídio e promoção da saúde mental, sobretudo no espaço acadêmico.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.

            There currently does not exist guidance for authors aiming to undertake systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies, such as those reporting prevalence and incidence information. These reviews are particularly useful to measure global disease burden and changes in disease over time. The aim of this article is to provide guidance for conducting these types of reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples.

              Past suicidal behaviors including ideation and attempts have been identified as significant risk factors for subsequent suicidal behavior. However, inadequate attention has been given to the development or validation of measures of past suicidal behavior. The present study examined the reliability and validity of a brief self-report measure of past suicidal behavior, the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R). Participants included psychiatric inpatient adolescents, high school students, psychiatric inpatient adults, and undergraduates. Logistic regression analyses provided empirical support for the usefulness of the SBQ-R as a risk measure of suicide to differentiate between suicide-risk and nonsuicidal study participants. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicated that the most useful cutoff scores on the SBQ-R were 7 for nonsuicidal samples, and 8 for clinical samples. Both the single SBQ-R Item 1 and SBQ-R total scores are recommended for use in clinical and nonclinical settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rev Lat Am Enfermagem
                Rev Lat Am Enfermagem
                RLAE
                Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
                Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
                0104-1169
                1518-8345
                08 November 2021
                2021
                : 29
                : e3495
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Hospital das Clínicas, Recife, PE, Brazil.
                [2 ]Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brazil.
                [3 ]Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde, Recife, PE, Brazil.
                Author notes
                [*]

                Supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Edital Universal CNPq 2016/Grant # 431020/2016-7, Brazil.

                Corresponding author: Marília de Oliveira Crispim E-mail: mariliaspy@ 123456gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-0722

                Associate Editor: Maria Lúcia Zanetti

                Authors’ Contribution:

                Study concept and design: Marília de Oliveira Crispim, Cândida Maria Rodrigues dos Santos, Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque Perrelli. Obtaining data: Marília de Oliveira Crispim, Cândida Maria Rodrigues dos Santos. Data analysis and interpretation: Marília de Oliveira Crispim, Cândida Maria Rodrigues dos Santos, Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque Perrelli. Statistical analysis: Marília de Oliveira Crispim, Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque Perrelli. Obtaining financing: Marília de Oliveira Crispim. Drafting the manuscript: Marília de Oliveira Crispim. Critical review of the manuscript as to its relevant intellectual content: Marília de Oliveira Crispim, Cândida Maria Rodrigues dos Santos, Iracema da Silva Frazão, Cecília Maria Farias de Queiroz Frazão, Rossana Carla Rameh de Albuquerque, Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque Perrelli.

                All authors approved the final version of the text.

                Conflict of interest: the authors have declared that there is no conflict of interest.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-0722
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4196-7413
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4690-3753
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-7505
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-1476
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4934-1335
                Article
                00608
                10.1590/1518-8345.5320.3495
                8584877
                34755776
                e0e4b9f7-fc20-4161-86ea-30383616d322
                Copyright © 2021 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 March 2021
                : 21 July 2021
                Categories
                Review Article

                suicide,suicidal ideation,attempted suicide,students,prevalence,universities,suicidio,ideación suicida,intento de suicidio,estudiantes,prevalencia,universidades,suicídio,ideação suicida,tentativa de suicídio,estudantes,prevalência

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content221

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors919