49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Endemic and Imported Measles Virus–Associated Outbreaks among Adults, Beijing, China, 2013

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In 2013, a resurgence of measles occurred in Beijing, China. The outbreaks occurred among adults and were associated with endemic genotype H1 and imported genotype D8 viruses. Migrant workers were disproportionately represented in the outbreaks; thus, vaccinating such workers against measles may be an effective strategy toward the elimination of this disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global distribution of measles genotypes and measles molecular epidemiology.

          A critical component of laboratory surveillance for measles is the genetic characterization of circulating wild-type viruses. The World Health Organization (WHO) Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (LabNet), provides for standardized testing in 183 countries and supports genetic characterization of currently circulating strains of measles viruses. The goal of this report is to describe the lessons learned from nearly 20 years of virologic surveillance for measles, to describe the global databases for measles sequences, and to provide regional updates about measles genotypes detected by recent surveillance activities. Virologic surveillance for measles is now well established in all of the WHO regions, and most countries have conducted at least some baseline surveillance. The WHO Global Genotype Database contains >7000 genotype reports, and the Measles Nucleotide Surveillance (MeaNS) contains >4000 entries. This sequence information has proven to be extremely useful for tracking global transmission patterns and for documenting the interruption of transmission in some countries. The future challenges will be to develop quality control programs for molecular methods and to continue to expand virologic surveillance activities in all regions. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2011.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Monitoring progress towards the elimination of measles in China: an analysis of measles surveillance data

            Objective To analyse the epidemiology of measles in China and determine the progress made towards the national elimination of the disease. Methods We analysed measles surveillance data – on the age, sex, residence and vaccination status of each case and the corresponding outcome, dates of onset and report and laboratory results – collected between January 2005 and October 2013. Findings Between 2005 and October 2013, 596 391 measles cases and 368 measles-related deaths were reported in China. Annual incidence, in cases per 100 000 population, decreased from 9.95 in 2008 to 0.46 in 2012 but then rose to more than 1.96 in 2013. The number of provinces that reported an annual incidence of less than one case per million population increased from one in 2009 to 15 in 2012 but fell back to one in 2013. Median case age decreased from 83 months in 2005 to 14 months in 2012 and 11 months in January to October 2013. Between 2008 and 2012, the incidence of measles in all age groups, including those not targeted for vaccination, decreased by at least 93.6%. However, resurgence started in late 2012 and continued into 2013. Of the cases reported in January to October 2013, 40% were aged 8 months to 6 years. Conclusion Although there is evidence of progress towards the elimination of measles from China, resurgence in 2013 indicated that many children were still not being vaccinated on time. Routine immunization must be strengthened and the remaining immunity gaps need to be identified and filled.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Global Control and Regional Elimination of Measles, 2000–2012

              In 2010, the World Health Assembly established three milestones toward global measles eradication to be reached by 2015: 1) increase routine coverage with the first dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) for children aged 1 year to ≥90% nationally and ≥80% in every district, 2) reduce and maintain annual measles incidence at <5 cases per million, and 3) reduce measles mortality by 95% from the 2000 estimate (1).* After the adoption by member states of the South-East Asia Region (SEAR) of the goal of measles elimination by 2020, elimination goals have been set by member states of all six World Health Organization (WHO) regions, and reaching measles elimination in four WHO regions by 2015 is an objective of the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP).† This report updates the previous report for 2000–2011 (2) and describes progress toward global control and regional elimination of measles during 2000–2012. During this period, increases in routine MCV coverage, plus supplementary immunization activities (SIAs)§ reaching 145 million children in 2012, led to a 77% decrease worldwide in reported measles annual incidence, from 146 to 33 per million population, and a 78% decline in estimated annual measles deaths, from 562,400 to 122,000. Compared with a scenario of no vaccination, an estimated 13.8 million deaths were prevented by measles vaccination during 2000–2012. Achieving the 2015 targets and elimination goals will require countries and their partners to raise the visibility of measles elimination and make substantial and sustained additional investments in strengthening health systems. Immunization Activities WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) use data from administrative records and surveys reported annually by member states to estimate MCV1 coverage among children aged 1 year.¶ Since 2003, member states also have reported the number of districts with ≥80% MCV1 coverage. Estimated MCV1 coverage increased globally from 73% to 84% during 2000–2009, then remained at 84% through 2012 (Table 1). The number of member states with ≥90% MCV1 coverage increased from 83 (43%) in 2000 to 128 (66%) in 2012. The number of member states with ≥90% MCV1 coverage nationally that also had ≥80% MCV1 coverage in all districts increased from 40 (38%) of 104 in 2003 to 58 (45%) of 128 in 2012. Of the estimated 21.2 million infants who did not receive MCV1 in 2012, approximately 13.5 million (64%) were in six member states: India (6.4 million), Nigeria (3.8 million), Ethiopia (1.0 million), Indonesia (0.9 million), Pakistan (0.7 million), and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (0.7 million). During 2000–2012, the number of member states providing the second dose of measles vaccine (MCV2) through routine immunization services increased from 96 (50%) to 145 (75%). During 2012, approximately 145 million children received MCV during SIAs conducted in 33 member states. MCV coverage ≥95% after SIAs was reported by 18 (55%) member states, and 12 (36%) member states conducted coverage surveys to validate coverage. During measles SIAs, 20 (61%) member states included one or more additional child health interventions; 18 (55%) included oral poliovirus vaccination (Table 2). Disease Incidence Effective measles surveillance includes case-based surveillance with laboratory testing to confirm cases. During 2004–2012,** the number of member states using case-based surveillance increased from 120 (62%) to 187 (96%).†† During 2000–2012, the number of member states with access to standardized quality-controlled testing through the WHO Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network increased from 71 (37%) to 191 (98%).§§ During 2000–2012, the number of measles cases reported worldwide each year¶¶ decreased 73%, from 853,480 to a historic low of 226,722, and measles incidence decreased 77%, from 146 to 33 cases per million population per year (Table 1). The decrease in 2012 occurred in all regions and followed 3 years of increasing numbers of cases. During 2000–2012, the Region of the Americas (AMR) maintained measles incidence at <5 cases per million; in 2012, reported incidence in the Western Pacific Region (WPR) was six cases per million, a historic low. The percentage of reporting member states with <5 cases per million increased from 55% (104 of 188) in 2011 to 64% (119 of 187) in 2012. During 2012, large measles outbreaks were reported by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (72,029 cases), India (18,668), Indonesia (15,489), Ukraine (12,746), Somalia (9,983), Sudan (8,523), Pakistan (8,046), and Romania (7,450). China reported 6,183 cases, a historic low after a steady annual decrease from 38,159 cases in 2010. Genotyping results from isolates from persons with measles were reported from 49 (39%) of the 125 member states reporting measles cases in 2012. Six measles genotypes were identified; the predominant genotypes were B3 in the African Region (AFR) and the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR); D4 in the European Region (EUR); H1, D8, and D9 in SEAR and WPR; with one G3 reported from one outbreak in WPR.*** Mortality Estimates In response to the lack of reliable data on the number of measles deaths from many member states, WHO has developed a model to estimate mortality using numbers and age distribution of reported cases, routine and SIA MCV coverage, and age-specific, country-specific case-fatality ratios (3,4). The model was refined in 2013 to reflect the impact of different SIA target age ranges and the population targeted in subnational SIAs. These refinements, together with new 2012 measles vaccination coverage and case data for all member states, updated data for the period before 2012 for some member states, and updated population estimates (5), led to new mortality estimates for 2000–2012. During this period, estimated measles deaths decreased 78%, from 562,400 to 122,000; all regions had substantial reductions in estimated measles mortality, ranging from 52% in EMR to 88% in AFR (Table 1). Compared with a scenario of no vaccination against measles, an estimated 13.8 million deaths were prevented by measles vaccination during 2000–2012 (Figure). Regional Verification of Measles Elimination By 2012, regional verification commissions were established in AMR, EUR, and WPR, and frameworks for documenting elimination were developed in AMR and EUR. While verifying elimination, member states in AMR uncovered weaknesses in surveillance and routine immunization programs, leading to a regional emergency plan of action to strengthen these programs. Editorial Note During 2000–2012, increasing routine MCV coverage worldwide and regular SIAs in member states lacking high coverage with 2 doses of MCV contributed to a 77% decrease in reported measles incidence and a 78% reduction in estimated measles mortality, reaching historic lows. During this period, measles vaccination prevented an estimated 13.8 million deaths. Measles elimination continues to be maintained in AMR (6), and WPR is approaching measles elimination (7). However, based on current trends and performance, the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) concluded that the 2015 global targets and regional elimination targets in EUR, EMR, and AFR will not be achieved on time (8). AFR, EMR, and SEAR, the regions with the largest number of infants not receiving MCV1 through routine immunization services in 2012, had large measles outbreaks during 2012 and had 98% of the estimated global measles mortality burden, highlighting the need to strengthen immunization systems. Globally 2012 might represent a temporary low in the normal cycle of measles incidence. Preventing a resurgence will require progress in reaching ≥95% of children with 2 MCV doses through routine immunization services and high-quality SIAs (9). The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, MCV coverage estimates likely included errors resulting from inaccurate estimates of the size of target populations, inaccurate reporting of doses delivered, and inclusion of SIA doses given to children outside the target age group. Second, underestimation in surveillance data can occur because not all patients with measles seek care and not all of those who seek care are reported. These errors in coverage and surveillance data in turn affect the accuracy of the measles mortality model results. Finally, some member states also maintain multiple reporting systems for measles and might, like India, report aggregate, unconfirmed cases rather than case-based data. To achieve measles elimination, member states should aim to fully implement measles control and elimination strategies described in GVAP and the 2012–2020 Global Measles and Rubella Strategic Plan (10) of the Measles and Rubella Initiative,††† which include achieving vaccination coverage ≥95% with 2 doses of MCV administered through routine immunization or SIAs and maintaining this coverage uniformly across all districts. For many member states now at <90% coverage nationally, reaching ≥95% coverage will require substantial and sustained additional investments of financial and human resources to strengthen health systems and achieve equitable access to immunization services. Further progress toward achieving the 2015 global measles control targets and regional measles elimination targets will also require member states and partners to increase the visibility of measles elimination activities and make the needed investments. What is already known on this topic? During 2000–2011, global vaccination coverage with the first dose of measles-containing vaccine increased from 72% to 84%, approximately 225 million children received a second opportunity for measles immunization during measles supplemental immunization activities in 2011, and global reported measles cases decreased until 2008, then increased in 2010 and 2011. By 2011, about 45% of countries had not met the incidence target of <5 cases per million. As milestones toward eventual global measles eradication, the 2010 World Health Assembly endorsed a series of targets to be met by 2015. What is added by this report? In 2012, estimated global coverage with the first dose of measles-containing vaccine remained at the 2011 level of 84%, but the number of countries providing a second dose of measles-containing vaccine through routine immunization services increased from 96 (50%) in 2000 to 145 (75%) in 2012, and 144 million children were vaccinated against measles during vaccination campaigns. In 2012, annual reported measles incidence was 33 reported cases per million population, a decline of 77% from 146 cases per million population in 2000, and estimated measles deaths decreased 78%, from 562,400 to 122,000. An estimated 13.8 million deaths were prevented by measles vaccination during 2000–2012. What are the implications for public health practice? Although measles incidence decreased during 2011–2012, the World Health Organization’s African, Eastern Mediterranean, and European regions are not on track to achieving their elimination targets. To accelerate progress toward achieving these regional measles elimination targets national governments and partners are urged to give these efforts high priority and adequate resources to achieve their commonly agreed upon goals, and in so doing reach the targets set by the Global Vaccine Action Plan.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Emerg Infect Dis
                Emerging Infect. Dis
                EID
                Emerging Infectious Diseases
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                1080-6040
                1080-6059
                March 2015
                : 21
                : 3
                : 477-479
                Affiliations
                [1]Beijing Center for Diseases Prevention and Control, Beijing, China (M. Chen, F. Huang, D. Liu, J. Li, J. Wu, Y. Deng);
                [2]National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing (Y. Zhang, H. Wang, W. Xu);
                [3]World Health Organization China Representative Office, Beijing (L. Rodewald)
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Wenbo Xu, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 155# Changbai Rd, Changping District, Beijing, China, 102206; email: wenbo_xu1@ 123456aliyun.com ; or Ying Deng, Beijing Center for Diseases Prevention and Control, 16# Hepingli Zhongjie, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100000, China; email: dengying751007@ 123456163.com
                Article
                14-0646
                10.3201/eid2103.140646
                4344261
                25695536
                e17d29ba-8871-4a91-b701-0c3f8fc5aac0
                History
                Categories
                Dispatch
                Dispatch
                Endemic and Imported Measles Virus–Associated Outbreaks among Adults, Beijing, China, 2013

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                adults,measles,outbreak,genotype h1,genotype d8,beijing,china,viruses,endemic measles,imported measles

                Comments

                Comment on this article