6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transfer of maternal immunity using a polyvalent vaccine and offspring protection in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Vaccination is an effective and alternative means of disease prevention, however, it cannot be conducted on the offspring of fish.  For this process to take place, the transfer of maternal immunity must be implemented. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of transferring immunity from the broodstock to the offspring using a polyvalent vaccine against A eromonas hydrophila , S treptococcus agalactiae , and Pseudomonas fluorescens in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus.

          Methods: Nile tilapia broodstock, with an average weight of 203g (±SD 23 g) was injected with a vaccine used as a treatment. Example include A . hydrophila monovalent (MA) , S . agalactiae monovalent (MS) , P . fluorescens monovalent (MP), A . hydrophila and S . agalactiae bivalent (BAS) , A . hydrophila and P . fluorescens bivalent (BAP), P . fluorescens and S . agalactiae bivalent (BPS), and A . hydrophila, S . agalactiae , and P . fluorescens polyvalent vaccines (PAPS). While the control was fish that were injected with a PBS solution. The broodstock’s immune response was observed on the 7 th, 14 th, 21 st, and 28 th day, while the immune response and challenge test on the offspring was conducted on the 10 th, 20 th, 30 th, and 40 th day during the post-hatching period.

          Result: The application of PAPS in broodstock could significantly induce the best immune response and immunity to multiple diseases compared to other treatments. The RPS of the PAPS was also higher than the other types of vaccines. This showed that the transfer of immunity from the broodstock to the Nile tilapia offspring could protect it against bacterial diseases such as A. hydrophila, S. agalactiae, and P. fluorescens.

          Conclusion: The application of PAPS A. hydrophila, S. agalactiae, P. fluorescens vaccines increased the broodstock’s immune response and it was transferred to their offsprings. They were able to produce tilapia seeds that are immune to diseases caused by A. hydrophila, S. agalactiae, and P. fluorescens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Lysozyme: an important defence molecule of fish innate immune system

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Routine haematological methods for use with fish blood

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ontogeny of the immune system of fish.

              Information on the ontogeny of the fish immune system is largely restricted to a few species of teleosts (e.g., rainbow trout, catfish, zebrafish, sea bass) and has previously focused on morphological features. However, basic questions including the identification of the first lympho-hematopoietic sites, the origin of T- and B-lymphocytes and the acquisition of full immunological capacities remain to be resolved. We review these three main topics with special emphasis on recent results obtained from the zebrafish, a new experimental model particularly suitable for study of the ontogeny of the immune system because of its rapid development and easy manipulation. This species also provides an easy way of creating mutations that can be detected by various types of screens. In some teleosts (i.e., angelfish) the first blood cells are formed in the yolk sac. In others, such as zebrafish, the first hematopoietic site is an intraembryonic locus, the intermediate cell mass (ICM), whereas in both killifish and rainbow trout the first blood cells appear for a short time in the yolk sac but later the ICM becomes the main hematopoietic area. Erythrocytes and macrophages are the first blood cells to be identified in zebrafish embryos. They occur in the ICM, the duct of Cuvier and the peripheral circulation. Between 24 and 30 hour post-fertilization (hpf) at a temperature of 28 degrees C a few myeloblasts and myelocytes appear between the yolk sac and the body walls, and the ventral region of the tail of 1-2 day-old zebrafish also contains developing blood cells. The thymus, kidney and spleen are the major lymphoid organs of teleosts. The thymus is the first organ to become lymphoid, although earlier the kidney can contain hematopoietic precursors but not lymphocytes. In freshwater, but not in marine, teleosts the spleen is the last organ to acquire that condition. We and other authors have demonstrated an early expression of Rag-1 in the zebrafish thymus that correlates well with the morphological identification of lymphoid cells. On the other hand, the origins and time of appearance of B lymphocytes in teleosts are a matter of discussion and recent results are summarized here. The functioning rather than the mere morphological evidence of lymphocytes determines when the full immunocompetence in fish is attained. Information on the histogenesis of fish lymphoid organs can also be obtained by analysing zebrafish mutants with defects in the development of immune progenitors and/or in the maturation of non-lymphoid stromal elements of the lymphoid organs. The main characteristics of some of these mutants will also be described.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data CurationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: Funding AcquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Data CurationRole: Project AdministrationRole: Validation
                Role: Data CurationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: Formal AnalysisRole: ValidationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                F1000Res
                F1000Res
                F1000Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2046-1402
                9 March 2023
                2021
                : 10
                : 966
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Aquaculture, Pangkep State Polytechnic of Agriculture, Pangkep, South Sulawesi, 90655, Indonesia
                [2 ]Agricultural Technology Education, Makassar State University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
                [1 ]Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, South East Sulawesi, Indonesia
                [1 ]Faculty of Fisheries and Food Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia
                [1 ]Faculty of Fisheries Technology and Aquatic Resources, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
                [1 ]Faculty of Fisheries and Food Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Malaysia
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1219-9788
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-4957
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-2747
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6689-9731
                Article
                10.12688/f1000research.52932.3
                10521061
                37767359
                e18519ed-8880-4ae1-b981-77dbc8cde5d2
                Copyright: © 2023 Amrullah A et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 6 March 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi
                Award ID: NationalStrategicResearchScheme(No.:004/PL.22.7.1/SP-PG/2019
                The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia for funding this study through the 2019 National Strategic Research Scheme (No.: 004/PL.22.7.1/SP-PG/2019).
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles

                aeromonas hydrophila,bivalent vaccine,monovalent vaccine,pseudomonas fluorescens,streptococcus agalactiae.

                Comments

                Comment on this article