0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Australian Animals and Veterinarians.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aimed to determine the frequency and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Australian animals and whether animal-derived MRSA was similar to that from Australian veterinarians. A total of 1,080 clinical coagulase positive Staphylococcus isolates from Australian animals were collected during 2013. Sixteen (4%) of 360 S. aureus isolates were MRSA. Most MRSA came from companion animals, while none came from livestock. MRSA isolates were characterized using whole genome sequencing. ST22-IV (EMRSA-15) was the most common clone in dogs and cats. Clonal complex (CC) 8 was most common in horses. Most ST22-IV isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Animal-derived MRSA genomes were interrogated for the presence of host-specific genetic markers (staphylokinase gene [scn], chemotaxis-inhibiting proteins gene [chp], staphylococcal complement inhibitor gene [sak], enterotoxin A gene [sea], and Von Willebrand Factor binding protein gene [vwb]). A subset of MRSA genomes previously collected from Australian veterinarians was also interrogated. There was no clear pattern in the distribution of host-specific markers among animal and veterinarian isolates. Animal- and veterinarian-derived MRSA were intermingled in the phylogenetic tree. The absence of MRSA in Australian livestock is in stark contrast with its presence in livestock from other countries. Possible explanations include Australia's geographic isolation, the absence of live animal importation into Australia, and most notably, the restrictions placed on the use of antimicrobials of critical importance in Australian livestock.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Microb. Drug Resist.
          Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.)
          Mary Ann Liebert Inc
          1931-8448
          1076-6294
          Mar 2018
          : 24
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] 1 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney , Sydney, Australia .
          [2 ] 2 Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, School of Veterinary Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia .
          [3 ] 3 PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital , Murdoch, Australia .
          [4 ] 4 Australian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide , Roseworthy, Australia .
          [5 ] 5 Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences , Cibinong, Indonesia .
          [6 ] 6 New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wollongbar, Australia .
          Article
          10.1089/mdr.2017.0032
          28598251
          e32e5030-5e81-4590-bab9-a5007eb2168e
          History

          veterinary microbiology,MRSA,antimicrobial resistance

          Comments

          Comment on this article