13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      CPSF6 is a Clinically Relevant Breast Cancer Vulnerability Target : Role of CPSF6 in Breast Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Breast cancer represents a major health challenge. The majority of breast cancer deaths are due to cancer progression/recurrence for which no efficient therapies exist. Aggressive breast cancers are characterized by loss of cellular differentiation. Defining molecular mechanisms/targets contributing to cancer aggressiveness is needed to guide the design of new screening and targeted treatments. Here, we describe a novel tumor promoting function for the Cleavage and Polyadenylation Factor-6 (CPSF6). Importantly, aggressive breast cancer cells of luminal B, HER2-overexpressing and triple negative subtypes show dependency on CPSF6 for viability and tumorigenic capacity. Mechanistically, we found CPSF6 to interact with components of the A-to-I RNA editing machinery, paraspeckles and ADAR1 enzyme, and to be required for their physical integrity. Clinically, we found CPSF6 and all core paraspeckles proteins to be overexpressed in human breast cancer cases and their expression to correlate with poor patient outcomes. Finally, we found prolactin, a key mammary differentiation factor, to suppress CPSF6/RNA editing activity. Together, this study revealed CPSF6 as a molecular target with clinical relevance for prognosis and therapy in breast cancer.

          Highlights

          • Aggressive breast cancer cells require CPSF6 for viability and tumorigenesis.

          • CPSF6 and paraspeckles core proteins are associated with poor outcome in breast cancer.

          • Prolactin hormone reprograms cells to suppress CPSF6 interaction with paraspeckles and ADAR1, A-I RNA editing machinery.

          Breast tumors of luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal (triple negative) subtypes are associated with poor differentiation and aggressive behavior. Defining targets contributing to cancer aggressiveness may offer new modalities for prognosis and therapy. This study demonstrated the critical role of CPSF6 for survival and tumorigenic capacity of aggressive breast cancer cells. CPSF6 is required for the physical integrity of the A-to-I RNA editing complex, paraspeckles and ADAR1 enzyme. CPSF6 and core paraspeckles proteins are biomarkers of poor patient outcome. In addition, prolactin hormone was found to suppress CPSF6 function. This study highlights CPSF6 as a therapeutic target in breast cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Elevated RNA Editing Activity Is a Major Contributor to Transcriptomic Diversity in Tumors.

          Genomic mutations in key genes are known to drive tumorigenesis and have been the focus of much attention in recent years. However, genetic content also may change farther downstream. RNA editing alters the mRNA sequence from its genomic blueprint in a dynamic and flexible way. A few isolated cases of editing alterations in cancer have been reported previously. Here, we provide a transcriptome-wide characterization of RNA editing across hundreds of cancer samples from multiple cancer tissues, and we show that A-to-I editing and the enzymes mediating this modification are significantly altered, usually elevated, in most cancer types. Increased editing activity is found to be associated with patient survival. As is the case with somatic mutations in DNA, most of these newly introduced RNA mutations are likely passengers, but a few may serve as drivers that may be novel candidates for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic pre-mRNA 3′ end processing regulation

            Messenger RNA (mRNA) 3′ end formation is a nuclear process through which all eukaryotic primary transcripts are endonucleolytically cleaved and most of them acquire a poly(A) tail. This process, which consists in the recognition of defined poly(A) signals of the pre-mRNAs by a large cleavage/polyadenylation machinery, plays a critical role in gene expression. Indeed, the poly(A) tail of a mature mRNA is essential for its functions, including stability, translocation to the cytoplasm and translation. In addition, this process serves as a bridge in the network connecting the different transcription, capping, splicing and export machineries. It also participates in the quantitative and qualitative regulation of gene expression in a variety of biological processes through the selection of single or alternative poly(A) signals in transcription units. A large number of protein factors associates with this machinery to regulate the efficiency and specificity of this process and to mediate its interaction with other nuclear events. Here, we review the eukaryotic 3′ end processing machineries as well as the comprehensive set of regulatory factors and discuss the different molecular mechanisms of 3′ end processing regulation by proposing several overlapping models of regulation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Principles Governing A-to-I RNA Editing in the Breast Cancer Transcriptome

              Summary Little is known about how RNA editing operates in cancer. Transcriptome analysis of 68 normal and cancerous breast tissues revealed that the editing enzyme ADAR acts uniformly, on the same loci, across tissues. In controlled ADAR expression experiments, the editing frequency increased at all loci with ADAR expression levels according to the logistic model. Loci-specific “editabilities,” i.e., propensities to be edited by ADAR, were quantifiable by fitting the logistic function to dose-response data. The editing frequency was increased in tumor cells in comparison to normal controls. Type I interferon response and ADAR DNA copy number together explained 53% of ADAR expression variance in breast cancers. ADAR silencing using small hairpin RNA lentivirus transduction in breast cancer cell lines led to less cell proliferation and more apoptosis. A-to-I editing is a pervasive, yet reproducible, source of variation that is globally controlled by 1q amplification and inflammation, both of which are highly prevalent among human cancers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                EBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                Elsevier
                2352-3964
                24 June 2017
                July 2017
                24 June 2017
                : 21
                : 65-78
                Affiliations
                Department of Medicine, Cancer Research Program, Centre for Translational Biology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Canada
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: MUHC-RI, Office E 02.6232, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.MUHC-RIOffice E 02.62321001 Decarie BlvdMontrealQuebecH4A 3J1Canada suhad.ali@ 123456mcgill.ca
                Article
                S2352-3964(17)30258-X
                10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.06.023
                5514498
                28673861
                e39ffac5-9561-4d90-aa3f-720d78413fa6
                © 2017 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 October 2016
                : 21 June 2017
                : 22 June 2017
                Categories
                Research Paper

                paraspeckles,a-to-i rna editing,long non-coding rna,prolactin,differentiation,mammary

                Comments

                Comment on this article