6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Therapeutic utility of percutaneous cecostomy in adults: an updated systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          Percutaneous cecostomy is a minimally invasive procedure that provides access to the colon for therapeutic interventions. This review aimed to update and summarize the existing information on the use and application of percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy in the field of therapeutic gastroenterology.

          Data Sources:

          A systematic review of the literature was performed without any restrictions on the year of publication from the date of inception in 1986 to January 2021.

          Methods:

          The review was performed using the medical subject heading keywords in the following search engines: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar.

          Results:

          A total of 29 articles were subjected to final data extraction. The review included a total of 174 patients who underwent percutaneous cecostomy. Most of the included studies were conducted in the United States ( n = 14). The most common comorbidity was cancer ( n = 10) and the major indication for performing percutaneous cecostomy was colonic pseudo-obstruction or Ogilvie’s syndrome ( n = 15). The main technique for performing percutaneous cecostomy was endoscopy (17 studies), followed by fluoroscopy- (five studies), computed-tomography- (three studies), laparoscopy- (two studies), and ultrasound- (one study) guided procedures. The procedure was technically successful in 153 (88%) cases. The total cumulative rates of major and minor complications were 47.5%. These complications included tube malfunction, local wound site infections, and bleeding and rare complications of peritonitis and death.

          Conclusion:

          Percutaneous cecostomy is a safe and effective option for managing acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. It leads to durable symptom relief with low to minimal risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

          Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, are not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (quality of reporting of meta-analysis) statement—a reporting guideline published in 1999—there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realising these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this explanation and elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA statement, this document, and the associated website (www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports

            Case reports and case series are uncontrolled study designs known for increased risk of bias but have profoundly influenced the medical literature and continue to advance our knowledge. In this guide, we present a framework for appraisal, synthesis and application of evidence derived from case reports and case series. We propose a tool to evaluate the methodological quality of case reports and case series based on the domains of selection, ascertainment, causality and reporting and provide signalling questions to aid evidence-based practitioners and systematic reviewers in their assessment. We suggest using evidence derived from case reports and case series to inform decision-making when no other higher level of evidence is available.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Expandable metal stents for the treatment of colonic obstruction: techniques and outcomes.

              Acute left-sided colonic obstruction is a surgical emergency whose management is controversial. Because experience using expandable metal stents for relief of this type of obstruction is limited, we evaluated their effectiveness, feasibility, safety, and outcome. Twenty-five patients with acute colorectal obstruction underwent placement of various metal stents under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance. On an intent-to-treat basis, stents were placed for decompression before one-stage surgical resection in 10 patients and palliatively in 15 patients. Two preoperative patients had unresectable malignant disease, and stents were left for palliation resulting in 17 palliative and 10 preoperative patients for analysis. Stent placement was technically successful in 94% of patients. Overall effectiveness in relieving obstruction was 85% (palliative 82%, preoperative 90%). In the palliative group, stent duration ranged from 2 to 64 weeks (mean 17.3 weeks). Major complications occurred in 7 patients (30%). Expandable metal stents are a feasible, effective adjunct and alternative to surgery for acute colorectal obstruction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing original draft
                Journal
                Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc
                Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc
                CMG
                spcmg
                Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2631-7745
                4 February 2022
                Jan-Dec 2022
                : 15
                : 26317745211073411
                Affiliations
                [1-26317745211073411]Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Al-Awali District, 24381 – 8156, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes
                [*]Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Al-Awali District, 24381 – 8156, Saudi Arabia. ymkhayyat@ 123456uqu.edu.sa
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-2028
                Article
                10.1177_26317745211073411
                10.1177/26317745211073411
                8819810
                35141521
                e4a3af2a-b1a8-443e-a4b0-661f3c8f0240
                © The Author(s), 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 8 July 2021
                : 24 December 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: umm al-qura university, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100006701;
                Award ID: 22UQU4290113DSR01
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2022
                ts1

                colitis,colon,interventional radiology,percutaneous cecostomy,radiological cecostomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article