Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differentiation of periapical granulomas and cysts by using dental MRI: a pilot study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate whether periapical granulomas can be differentiated from periapical cysts in vivo by using dental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prior to apicoectomy, 11 patients with radiographically confirmed periapical lesions underwent dental MRI, including fat-saturated T2-weighted (T2wFS) images, non-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images with and without fat saturation (T1w/T1wFS), and contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted (T1wFS+C) images. Two independent observers performed structured image analysis of MRI datasets twice. A total of 15 diagnostic MRI criteria were evaluated, and histopathological results (6 granulomas and 5 cysts) were compared with MRI characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cohen’s kappa (κ), Mann–Whitney U-test and Fisher’s exact test. Lesion identification and consecutive structured image analysis was possible on T2wFS and T1wFS+C MRI images. A high reproducibility was shown for MRI measurements of the maximum lesion diameter (intraobserver ICC = 0.996/0.998; interobserver ICC = 0.997), for the “peripheral rim” thickness (intraobserver ICC = 0.988/0.984; interobserver ICC = 0.970), and for all non-quantitative MRI criteria (intraobserver-κ = 0.990/0.995; interobserver-κ = 0.988). In accordance with histopathological results, six MRI criteria allowed for a clear differentiation between cysts and granulomas: (1) outer margin of lesion, (2) texture of “peripheral rim” in T1wFS+C, (3) texture of “lesion center” in T2wFS, (4) surrounding tissue involvement in T2wFS, (5) surrounding tissue involvement in T1wFS+C and (6) maximum “peripheral rim” thickness (all: P < 0.05). In conclusion, this pilot study indicates that radiation-free dental MRI enables a reliable differentiation between periapical cysts and granulomas in vivo. Thus, MRI may substantially improve treatment strategies and help to avoid unnecessary surgery in apical periodontitis.

          Dental imaging: Diagnosing tooth root lesions using magnetic resonance imaging

          Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can differentiate between periapical (apex of a tooth root) cysts and granulomas (inflammations usually caused by infections). MRI is a radiation-free, non-invasive imaging technique, and a team headed by Tim Hilgenfeld at Heidelberg University Hospital in Germany conducted a pilot study to determine whether dental MRI could be used to distinguish periapical cysts from granulomas in 11 patients with confirmed periapical lesions. The authors found that dental MRI allowed for the identification of six characteristics, each of which had the capacity to clearly differentiate between periapical cysts and granulomas. The team’s findings need to be confirmed in future studies with larger numbers of patients. But the results could have a substantial clinical impact in improving diagnoses and avoiding unnecessary surgery in patients with periapical lesions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of endodontic failures.

          Apical periodontitis is a sequel to endodontic infection and manifests itself as the host defense response to microbial challenge emanating from the root canal system. It is viewed as a dynamic encounter between microbial factors and host defenses at the interface between infected radicular pulp and periodontal ligament that results in local inflammation, resorption of hard tissues, destruction of other periapical tissues, and eventual formation of various histopathological categories of apical periodontitis, commonly referred to as periapical lesions. The treatment of apical periodontitis, as a disease of root canal infection, consists of eradicating microbes or substantially reducing the microbial load from the root canal and preventing re-infection by orthograde root filling. The treatment has a remarkably high degree of success. Nevertheless, endodontic treatment can fail. Most failures occur when treatment procedures, mostly of a technical nature, have not reached a satisfactory standard for the control and elimination of infection. Even when the highest standards and the most careful procedures are followed, failures still occur. This is because there are root canal regions that cannot be cleaned and obturated with existing equipments, materials, and techniques, and thus, infection can persist. In very rare cases, there are also factors located within the inflamed periapical tissue that can interfere with post-treatment healing of the lesion. The data on the biological causes of endodontic failures are recent and scattered in various journals. This communication is meant to provide a comprehensive overview of the etio-pathogenesis of apical periodontitis and the causes of failed endodontic treatments that can be visualized in radiographs as asymptomatic post-treatment periapical radiolucencies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology.

            This study compares 2 measures of effective dose, E(1990) and E(2007), for 8 dentoalveolar and maxillofacial cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) units and a 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) unit. Average tissue-absorbed dose, equivalent dose, and effective dose were calculated using thermoluminescent dosimeter chips in a radiation analog dosimetry phantom. Effective doses were derived using 1990 and the superseding 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations. Large-field of view (FOV) CBCT E(2007) ranged from 68 to 1,073 microSv. Medium-FOV CBCT E(2007) ranged from 69 to 560 microSv, whereas a similar-FOV MDCT produced 860 microSv. The E(2007) calculations were 23% to 224% greater than E(1990). The 2007 recommendations of the ICRP, which include salivary glands, extrathoracic region, and oral mucosa in the calculation of effective dose, result in an upward reassessment of fatal cancer risk from oral and maxillofacial radiographic examinations. Dental CBCT can be recommended as a dose-sparing technique in comparison with alternative medical CT scans for common oral and maxillofacial radiographic imaging tasks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Metal-induced artifacts in MRI.

              The purpose of this article is to review some of the basic principles of imaging and how metal-induced susceptibility artifacts originate in MR images. We will describe common ways to reduce or modify artifacts using readily available imaging techniques, and we will discuss some advanced methods to correct readout-direction and slice-direction artifacts. The presence of metallic implants in MRI can cause substantial image artifacts, including signal loss, failure of fat suppression, geometric distortion, and bright pile-up artifacts. These cause large resonant frequency changes and failure of many MRI mechanisms. Careful parameter and pulse sequence selections can avoid or reduce artifacts, although more advanced imaging methods offer further imaging improvements.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49 6221 56-7566 , tim.hilgenfeld@med.uni-heidelberg.de
                Journal
                Int J Oral Sci
                Int J Oral Sci
                International Journal of Oral Science
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1674-2818
                2049-3169
                17 May 2018
                17 May 2018
                June 2018
                : 10
                : 2
                : 17
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0328 4908, GRID grid.5253.1, Department of Neuroradiology, , Heidelberg University Hospital, ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0328 4908, GRID grid.5253.1, Division of Endodontics and Dental Traumatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry, , Heidelberg University Hospital, ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0328 4908, GRID grid.5253.1, Institute of Pathology, , Heidelberg University Hospital, ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, Heidelberg, Germany
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0328 4908, GRID grid.5253.1, Division of Experimental Radiology, Department of Neuroradiology, , Heidelberg University Hospital, ; Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3458-8899
                Article
                17
                10.1038/s41368-018-0017-y
                5966810
                29777107
                e6178187-3ed8-4514-94dd-8b8bfbd38469
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 5 November 2017
                : 23 March 2018
                : 29 March 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Dentistry
                Dentistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article