5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      SVEAT score outperforms HEART score in patients admitted to a chest pain observation unit

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Timely and accurate identification of subgroup at risk for major adverse cardiovascular events among patients presenting with acute chest pain remains a challenge. Currently available risk stratification scores are suboptimal. Recently, a new scoring system called the Symptoms, history of Vascular disease, Electrocardiography, Age, and Troponin (SVEAT) score has been shown to outperform the History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk factors and Troponin (HEART) score, one of the most used risk scores in the United States.

          AIM

          To assess the potential usefulness of the SVEAT score as a risk stratification tool by comparing its performance to HEART score in chest pain patients with low suspicion for acute coronary syndrome and admitted for overnight observation.

          METHODS

          We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 330 consecutive patients admitted to our clinical decision unit for acute chest pain between January 1 st to April 17 th, 2019. To avoid potential biases, investigators assigned to calculate the SVEAT, and HEART scores were blinded to the results of 30-d combined endpoint of death, acute myocardial infarction or confirmed coronary artery disease requiring revascularization or medical therapy [30-d major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)]. An area under receiving-operator characteristic curve (AUC) for each score was then calculated. C-statistic and logistic model were used to compare predictive performance of the two scores.

          RESULTS

          A 30-d MACE was observed in 11 patients (3.33% of the subjects). The AUC of SVEAT score (0.8876, 95%CI: 0.82-0.96) was significantly higher than the AUC of HEART score (0.7962, 95%CI: 0.71-0.88), P = 0.03. Using logistic model, SVEAT score with cut-off of 4 or less significantly predicts 30-d MACE (odd ratio 1.52, 95%CI: 1.19-1.95, P = 0.001) but not the HEART score (odd ratio 1.29, 95%CI: 0.78-2.14, P = 0.32).

          CONCLUSION

          The SVEAT score is superior to the HEART score as a risk stratification tool for acute chest pain in low to intermediate risk patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation

            2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary.

              This report presents the most current (2006) nationally representative data on visits to hospital emergency departments (ED) in the United States. Statistics are presented on selected hospital, patient, and visit characteristics. Data are from the 2006 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), the longest continuously running nationally representative survey of hospital ED utilization. The NHAMCS collects data on visits to emergency and outpatient departments of nonfederal, short-stay, and general hospitals in the United States. Sample data are weighted to produce annual national estimates. In 2006 there were 119.2 million visits to hospital EDs, or 40.5 visits per 100 persons, continuing a long-term rise in both indices. The rate of visits per 100 persons was 36.1 for white persons, 79.9 for black persons, and 35.3 for Hispanic persons. ED occupancy (the count of patients who had arrived, but not yet discharged, transferred, or admitted) varied from 19,000 patients at 6 a.m. to 58,000 at 7 p.m. on an average day nationally. Though overall ED visits increased, the number of visits considered emergent or urgent (15.9 million) did not change significantly from 2005, nor did the number of patients arriving by ambulance (18.4 million). At 3.6 percent of visits, the patient had been seen in the same ED within the previous 72 hours. Median time to see a clinician was 31 minutes. Of all ED visits, 35.6 percent were for an injury. Patients had computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging at 12.1 percent of visits, blood drawn at 38.8 percent, an intravenous line started at 24.0 percent, an x ray performed at 34.9 percent, and an electrocardiogram done at 17.1 percent. Patients were admitted to the hospital at 12.8 percent of ED visits in 2006. The ED was the portal of admission for 50.2 percent of all nonobstetric admissions in the United States in 2006, an increase from 36.0 percent in 1996. Patients were admitted to an intensive care unit at 1.9 percent of visits.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Cardiol
                WJC
                World Journal of Cardiology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1949-8462
                26 August 2022
                26 August 2022
                : 14
                : 8
                : 454-461
                Affiliations
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Institute for Heart and Vascular Health, Renown Regional Medical Center, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States. brycebeutler@ 123456hotmail.com
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Antwi-Amoabeng D and Roongsritong C helped design the research study and wrote the original draft of the manuscript; Taha M, Beutler BD, Awad M and Hanfy A contributed to data curation, validation, and formal analysis; Ghuman J, Manasewitsch NT, Singh S and Quang C contributed to data curation and helped review and edit the manuscript; Gullapalli N supervised the project from initiation to completion.

                Corresponding author: Bryce David Beutler, MD, Doctor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, 1155 Mill Street W-11, Reno, Nevada 89502, United States. brycebeutler@ 123456hotmail.com

                Article
                jWJC.v14.i8.pg454
                10.4330/wjc.v14.i8.454
                9453257
                36160811
                e67cf05e-f380-4c1f-829b-f62ba2c6e2a5
                ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 21 October 2021
                : 21 May 2022
                : 5 August 2022
                Categories
                Retrospective Cohort Study

                acute chest pain,risk stratification tool,symptoms, history of vascular disease, electrocardiography, age, and troponin score,history, electrocardiography, age, risk factors and troponin score

                Comments

                Comment on this article