5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neophytes may promote hybridization and adaptations to a changing planet

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Human activities erode geographic barriers, facilitating hybridization among previously isolated taxa. However, limited empirical research exists on the consequences of introduced species (neophytes) for hybridization and subsequent evolutionary outcomes. To address this knowledge gap, we employed a macroecological approach. First, we examined the spatial and phylogenetic overlap between neophytes and hybrids by integrating the Plants of the World Online database with the Global Naturalized Alien Flora database. Second, leveraging the largest dated plant phylogeny available, we compared diversification rates between genera containing hybrids and neophytes versus those without. Third, focusing on the extensively studied hybrid flora of Britain, we studied the spatial distributions of hybrids in relation to neophyte and native parents, assessing potential adaptations to anthropogenic disturbances and impacts on native species. Overall, our findings highlight positive ties between contemporary biodiversity redistribution and hybridization. Spatially (across countries) and phylogenetically (across genera), neophyte incidence was positively associated with hybrid incidence. Genera comprising both hybrids and neophytes displayed significantly higher diversification rates. Neophyte hybrids primarily occupied areas with a higher human footprint, with limited evidence of hybrids threatening native species throughout their range in more natural habitats. These results challenge the notion that species naturalizations and hybridizations exclusively yield negative outcomes for biodiversity. While it is conceivable that anthropogenic hybridization may facilitate recombination of genetic variation and contribute to conserving genetic diversity in disturbed environments, further research is needed to fully understand these processes.

          Abstract

          The human‐mediated breakdown of geographic barriers to gene flow provides previously isolated, genetically distinct taxa with unprecedented new opportunities for hybridization, potentially having a profound impact on biodiversity. We studied the impact of neophyte naturalization on hybrid formation from a macroecological perspective and aimed to gain more insights into its potential evolutionary consequences. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that a global reshuffling of biota augments hybridization rates possibly representing not only a threat to diversity, but a process that can promote diversification and adaptations to anthropogenic global change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Simple Features for R: Standardized Support for Spatial Vector Data

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ingmar.staude@uni-leipzig.de
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                16 August 2023
                August 2023
                : 13
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v13.8 )
                : e10405
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig Germany
                [ 2 ] German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ingmar R. Staude, Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

                Email: ingmar.staude@ 123456uni-leipzig.de

                Article
                ECE310405 ECE-2023-03-00438.R1
                10.1002/ece3.10405
                10427993
                e685e859-5d0c-4822-8be2-534600ea1192
                © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 July 2023
                : 21 March 2023
                : 24 July 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Pages: 11, Words: 8391
                Categories
                Biodiversity Ecology
                Biogeography
                Community Ecology
                Conservation Ecology
                Evolutionary Ecology
                Global Change Ecology
                Global Ecology
                Invasion Ecology
                Macroecology
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.3 mode:remove_FC converted:16.08.2023

                Evolutionary Biology
                anthropogenic hybridization,biodiversity redistribution,biotic and genetic homogenization,diversification,human footprint,non‐natives

                Comments

                Comment on this article