16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Semaglutide, reduction in glycated haemoglobin and the risk of diabetic retinopathy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To evaluate diabetic retinopathy (DR) data from across the SUSTAIN clinical trial programme.

          Materials and methods

          The SUSTAIN clinical trial programme evaluated the efficacy and safety of semaglutide, a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). In SUSTAIN 6, a 2‐year, pre‐approval cardiovascular outcomes trial, semaglutide was associated with a significant increase in the risk of DR complications (DRC) vs placebo. DR data from across the SUSTAIN trials were evaluated, and post hoc analyses of the SUSTAIN 6 data were conducted. These included subgroup analyses to identify at‐risk patients and a mediation analysis with initial change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; percentage‐points at week 16) as a covariate, to examine the role of the magnitude of reduction in HbA1c as an intermediate factor affecting risk of DRC.

          Results

          There was no imbalance in DR adverse events across the SUSTAIN 1 to 5 and Japanese trials. The majority of the effect with semaglutide vs placebo in SUSTAIN 6 may be attributed to the magnitude and rapidity of HbA1c reduction during the first 16 weeks of treatment in patients who had pre‐existing DR and poor glycaemic control at baseline, and who were treated with insulin.

          Conclusions

          Early worsening of DR is a known phenomenon associated with the rapidity and magnitude of improvement in glycaemic control with insulin; the DRC findings in SUSTAIN 6 are consistent with this. Guidance regarding the early worsening of DR is recommended with insulin. Similar recommendations may be appropriate for semaglutide.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.

          (1998)
          To document the frequency, importance of, and risk factors for "early worsening" of diabetic retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The DCCT was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing intensive vs conventional treatment in insulin-dependent diabetic patients who had no to moderate nonproliferative retinopathy. Retinopathy severity was assessed in 7-field stereoscopic fundus photographs taken at baseline and every 6 months. For this study, worsening was defined as progression of 3 steps or more on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study final scale, as the development of soft exudates and/or intraretinal microvascular abnormalities, as the development of clinically important retinopathy, or as any of the above, and was considered "early" if it occurred between baseline and 12-month follow-up visits. Early worsening was observed at the 6- and/or 12-month visit in 13.1% of 711 patients assigned to intensive treatment and in 7.6% of 728 patients assigned to conventional treatment (odds ratio, 2.06; P < .001); recovery had occurred at the 18-month visit in 51% and 55% of these groups, respectively (P = .39). The risk of 3-step or greater progression from the retinopathy level present 18 months after entry into the trial was greater in patients who previously had had early worsening than in those who had not. However, the large long-term risk reduction with intensive treatment was such that outcomes in intensively treated patients who had early worsening were similar to or more favorable than outcomes in conventionally treated patients who had not. The most important risk factors for early worsening were higher hemoglobin A1c level at screening and reduction of this level during the first 6 months after randomization. We found no evidence to suggest that more gradual reduction of glycemia might be associated with less risk of early worsening. Early worsening led to high-risk proliferative retinopathy in 2 patients and to clinically significant macular edema in 3; all responded well to treatment. In the DCCT, the long-term benefits of intensive insulin treatment greatly outweighed the risks of early worsening. Although no case of early worsening was associated with serious visual loss, our results are consistent with previous reports of sight-threatening worsening when intensive treatment is initiated in patients with long-standing poor glycemic control, particularly if retinopathy is at or past the moderate nonproliferative stage. Ophthalmologic monitoring before initiation of intensive treatment and at 3-month intervals for 6 to 12 months thereafter seems appropriate for such patients. In patients whose retinopathy is already approaching the high-risk stage, it may be prudent to delay the initiation of intensive treatment until photocoagulation can be completed, particularly if hemoglobin A1c is high.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Semaglutide, a Once-Weekly Human GLP-1 Analog, Does Not Reduce the Bioavailability of the Combined Oral Contraceptive, Ethinylestradiol/Levonorgestrel

            The effect of semaglutide, a once-weekly human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog in development for type 2 diabetes (T2D), on the bioavailability of a combined oral contraceptive was investigated. Postmenopausal women with T2D (n = 43) on diet/exercise ± metformin received ethinylestradiol (0.03 mg)/levonorgestrel (0.15 mg) once daily for 8 days before (semaglutide-free) and during (steady-state 1.0 mg) semaglutide treatment (subcutaneous once weekly; dose escalation: 0.25 mg 4 weeks; 0.5 mg 4 weeks; 1.0 mg 5 weeks). Bioequivalence of oral contraceptives was established if 90%CI for the ratio of pharmacokinetic parameters during semaglutide steady-state and semaglutide-free periods was within prespecified limits (0.80–1.25). The bioequivalence criterion was met for ethinylestradiol area under the curve (AUC0–24 h) for semaglutide steady-state/semaglutide-free; 1.11 (1.06–1.15). AUC0–24 h was 20% higher for levonorgestrel at semaglutide steady-state vs. semaglutide-free (1.20 [1.15–1.26]). Cmax was within bioequivalence criterion for both contraceptives. Reductions (mean ± SD) in HbA1c (–1.1 ± 0.6%) and weight (–4.3 ± 3.1 kg) were observed. Semaglutide pharmacokinetics were compatible with once-weekly dosing; the semaglutide dose and dose-escalation regimen were well tolerated. Adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal, were mild to moderate in severity. Asymptomatic increases in mean amylase and lipase were observed. Three subjects had elevated alanine aminotransferase levels ≥3x the upper limit of normal during semaglutide/oral contraceptive coadministration, which were reported as adverse events, but resolved during follow-up. Semaglutide did not reduce the bioavailability of ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of a Single Dose of Semaglutide, a Human Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Analog, in Subjects With and Without Renal Impairment

              Background The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of semaglutide, a once-weekly human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, were investigated in subjects with/without renal impairment (RI). Methods Fifty-six subjects, categorized into renal function groups [normal, mild, moderate, severe, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD)], received a single subcutaneous dose of semaglutide 0.5 mg. Semaglutide plasma concentrations were assessed ≤480 h post-dose; the primary endpoint was the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity. Results Semaglutide exposure in subjects with mild/moderate RI and ESRD was similar to that in subjects with normal renal function. In subjects with severe RI, the mean exposure of semaglutide was 22% higher than in subjects with normal renal function, and the 95% confidence interval (1.02–1.47) for the ratio exceeded the pre-specified limits (0.70–1.43). When adjusted for differences in sex, age, and body weight between the groups, all comparisons were within the pre-specified clinically relevant limits. Across RI groups there was no relationship between creatinine clearance (CLCR) and semaglutide exposure, or between CLCR and semaglutide maximum plasma drug concentration (C max). Hemodialysis did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of semaglutide. No appreciable changes in safety parameters or vital signs and no serious adverse events were noted. One subject with severe RI reported two major hypoglycemic events. Conclusion When adjusted for differences in sex, age, and body weight, semaglutide exposure was similar between subjects with RI and subjects with normal renal function. Semaglutide (0.5 mg) was well-tolerated. Dose adjustment may not be warranted for subjects with RI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00833716.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                t.vilsboll@dadlnet.dk
                Journal
                Diabetes Obes Metab
                Diabetes Obes Metab
                10.1111/(ISSN)1463-1326
                DOM
                Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1462-8902
                1463-1326
                08 January 2018
                April 2018
                : 20
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/dom.2018.20.issue-4 )
                : 889-897
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen University of Copenhagen Gentofte Denmark
                [ 2 ] School of Medicine Swansea University Swansea UK
                [ 3 ] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital University of Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 4 ] University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
                [ 5 ] Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, and Harris Manchester College University of Oxford Oxford UK
                [ 6 ] Diabetes and Metabolism Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute Barcelona and CIBERDEM (ISCIII) Madrid Spain
                [ 7 ] Novo Nordisk Søborg Denmark
                [ 8 ] Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet and Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Prof. Tina Vilsbøll, MD, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, DK‐2820 Gentofte, Denmark. Email: t.vilsboll@ 123456dadlnet.dk

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-6787
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1040-6229
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7006-7401
                Article
                DOM13172
                10.1111/dom.13172
                5888154
                29178519
                e80dd481-a273-4d11-91f4-76daec90cb89
                © 2017 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 22 August 2017
                : 02 November 2017
                : 21 November 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 9, Words: 6175
                Funding
                Funded by: Novo Nordisk A/S
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                dom13172
                April 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.4 mode:remove_FC converted:06.04.2018

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                antidiabetic drug,diabetic retinopathy,glp‐1 analogue
                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                antidiabetic drug, diabetic retinopathy, glp‐1 analogue

                Comments

                Comment on this article