14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Morbidity, mortality and quality of life in the ageing haemodialysis population: results from the ELDERLY study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The physical–functional and social–emotional health as well as survival of the elderly (≥75 years of age) haemodialysis patient is commonly thought to be poor. In a prospective, multicentre, non-interventional, observational study, the morbidity, mortality and quality of life (QoL) in this patient group were examined and compared with a younger cohort.

          Methods

          In 92 German dialysis centres, 2507 prevalent patients 19–98 years of age on haemodialysis for a median of 19.2 months were included in a drug monitoring study of darbepoetin alfa. To examine outcome and QoL parameters, 24 months of follow-up data in the age cohorts <75 and ≥75 years were analysed. Treatment parameters, adverse and intercurrent events, hospitalizations, morbidity and mortality were assessed. QoL was evaluated by means of the 47-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Anaemia score (FACT-An, version 4).

          Results

          The 2-year mortality rate was 34.7% for the older cohort and 15.8% for the younger cohort. The mortality rate for the haemodialysed elderly patients was 6.2% higher in absolute value compared with the age-matched background population. A powerful predictor of survival was the baseline FACT-An score and a close correlation with the 20-item anaemia subscale (AnS) was demonstrated. While the social QoL in the elderly patients was more stable than in the younger cohort (leading to equivalent values at the end of the study period), a pronounced deterioration of physical and functional status was observed. The median number of all-cause hospital days per patient-year was 12.3 for the elderly cohort and 8.9 for the younger patient population. The overall 24-month hospitalization rate was only marginally higher in the elderly cohort (34.0 versus 33.3%).

          Conclusions

          In this observational study, the mortality rate of elderly haemodialysis patients was not exceedingly high compared with the age-matched background population. Furthermore, the hospitalization rate was only slightly higher compared with the younger age group and the median yearly hospitalization time trended lower compared with registry data. The social well-being of elderly haemodialysis patients showed a less pronounced decline over time and was equal to the score of the younger cohort at the end of the study period. The physical and functional status in the elderly patients was lower and showed a sharper decline over time. The baseline FACT-An score correlated closely with the 24-month survival probability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Functional status of elderly adults before and after initiation of dialysis.

          It is unclear whether functional status before dialysis is maintained after the initiation of this therapy in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Using a national registry of patients undergoing dialysis, which was linked to a national registry of nursing home residents, we identified all 3702 nursing home residents in the United States who were starting treatment with dialysis between June 1998 and October 2000 and for whom at least one measurement of functional status was available before the initiation of dialysis. Functional status was measured by assessing the degree of dependence in seven activities of daily living (on the Minimum Data Set-Activities of Daily Living [MDS-ADL] scale of 0 to 28 points, with higher scores indicating greater functional difficulty). The median MDS-ADL score increased from 12 during the 3 months before the initiation of dialysis to 16 during the 3 months after the initiation of dialysis. Three months after the initiation of dialysis, functional status had been maintained in 39% of nursing home residents, but by 12 months after the initiation of dialysis, 58% had died and predialysis functional status had been maintained in only 13%. In a random-effects model, the initiation of dialysis was associated with a sharp decline in functional status, indicated by an increase of 2.8 points in the MDS-ADL score (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 to 3.0); this decline was independent of age, sex, race, and functional-status trajectory before the initiation of dialysis. The decline in functional status associated with the initiation of dialysis remained substantial (1.7 points; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.1), even after adjustment for the presence or absence of an accelerated functional decline during the 3-month period before the initiation of dialysis. Among nursing home residents with ESRD, the initiation of dialysis is associated with a substantial and sustained decline in functional status. 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Significance of frailty among dialysis patients.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dialysis or not? A comparative survival study of patients over 75 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5.

              The number of elderly patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 is steadily increasing. Evidence is needed to inform decision-making for or against dialysis, especially in those patients with multiple comorbid conditions for whom dialysis may not increase survival. We therefore compared survival of elderly patients with CKD stage 5, managed either with dialysis or conservatively (without dialysis), after the management decision had been made, and explored which of several key variables were independently associated with survival. A retrospective analysis of the survival of all over 75 years with CKD stage 5 attending dedicated multidisciplinary pre-dialysis care clinics (n=129) was performed. Demographic and comorbidity data were collected on all patients. Survival was defined as the time from estimated GFR<15 ml/min to either death or study endpoint. One- and two-year survival rates were 84% and 76% in the dialysis group (n=52) and 68% and 47% in the conservative group (n=77), respectively, with significantly different cumulative survival (log rank 13.6, P<0.001). However, this survival advantage was lost in those patients with high comorbidity scores, especially when the comorbidity included ischaemic heart disease. In CKD stage 5 patients over 75 years, who receive specialist nephrological care early, and who follow a planned management pathway, the survival advantage of dialysis is substantially reduced by comorbidity and ischaemic heart disease in particular. Comorbidity should be a major consideration when advising elderly patients for or against dialysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Kidney J
                Clin Kidney J
                ckj
                ndtplus
                Clinical Kidney Journal
                Oxford University Press
                2048-8505
                2048-8513
                December 2016
                26 September 2016
                26 September 2016
                : 9
                : 6
                : 839-848
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Zug Cantonal Hospital, Landhausstrasse 11, 6340 Baar, Switzerland
                [2 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 162, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
                [3 ]Nephrologicum Lausitz, Ambulantes Zentrum fuer Nieren- und Hochdruckerkrankungen, Cottbus, Germany
                [4 ]Nieren- und Gefaesszentrum Kiel, Ambulanz fuer Nieren- und Hochdruckerkrankungen, Dialyse und Transplantationsmedizin, Kiel, Germany
                [5 ]Sana Kliniken Luebeck, Nierenzentrum, Luebeck, Germany
                [6 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
                [7 ]KfH Kuratorium fuer Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V., Bildungszentrum, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
                [8 ]Amgen GmbH, Munich, Germany
                [9 ]Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
                Author notes
                Correspondence and offprint requests to: Joerg Seckinger; E-mail: jsecking@ 123456ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
                Article
                sfw087
                10.1093/ckj/sfw087
                5162412
                e8605dda-425e-4a47-bf65-c8979b848ad7
                © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 28 August 2015
                : 27 July 2016
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Categories
                Haemodialysis

                Nephrology
                chronic haemodialysis,elderly,quality of life,survival analysis,vascular access
                Nephrology
                chronic haemodialysis, elderly, quality of life, survival analysis, vascular access

                Comments

                Comment on this article