17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Unassisted Quitting and Smoking Cessation Methods Used in the United States: Analyses of 2010–2011 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey Data

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , PhD 2
      Nicotine & Tobacco Research
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The study estimated the prevalence of unassisted quitting (ie, quitting without pharmacological aids or other interventions) among former smokers and identified the most common smoking cessation methods used by U.S. adult smokers who quit smoking between 2007 and 2011. Among long-term quitters, smoking-related behaviors and factors associated with using pharmacological methods and quitting unassisted were examined.

          Methods

          The analytic sample consisted solely of former smokers, including 3,583 “long-term quitters” (those who quit 1 to 3 years prior to the survey) and 2,205 “recent quitters” (those who quit within a year prior to the survey), who responded to the 2010–2011 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey.

          Results

          About 72% of former smokers quit unassisted, 26% used at least one pharmacological method, and 7% used at least one nonpharmacological method. The most common pharmacological methods were the nicotine patch (12%), Chantix/Varenicline (11%), and a nicotine gum/lozenge (8%). For long-term quitters, cutting back on cigarettes gradually and relying on social support were more commonly associated with pharmacological methods. Among long-term quitters, younger adults (18 to 44 years old), Non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, those who were less nicotine dependent prior to quitting and those who did not visit a doctor in the past 12 months before quitting had higher odds of reporting unassisted quitting than quitting with pharmacological methods.

          Conclusions

          Unassisted quitting remains the predominant means of recent and long-term smoking cessation in the United States. Attempters may try different ways of quitting during the same quit attempt.

          Implications

          Unassisted quitting remains a much more common method for recent and long-term smoking cessation than use of pharmacological or nonpharmacological methods. Smokers may try different ways of quitting during the same quit attempt. Thus, population-based studies that investigate the use of particular methods while ignoring other ways of quitting may overestimate the benefits of certain methods for smoking cessation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Nicotine Tob Res
          Nicotine Tob. Res
          nictob
          Nicotine & Tobacco Research
          Oxford University Press (US )
          1462-2203
          1469-994X
          January 2018
          19 October 2016
          13 December 2018
          : 20
          : 1
          : 30-39
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
          [2 ]Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Julia N. Soulakova, PhD, Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32827, USA. Telephone: 407-266-7072; Fax: 407-266-7002; E-mail: julia.soulakova@ 123456ucf.edu
          Article
          PMC5896463 PMC5896463 5896463 ntw273
          10.1093/ntr/ntw273
          5896463
          27798084
          e874d870-bdcf-4f3d-a4af-91117fce4cc9
          © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
          History
          : 02 September 2015
          : 05 October 2016
          Page count
          Pages: 10
          Funding
          Funded by: National Institute On Minority Health And Health Disparities 10.13039/100006545
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
          Award ID: R01MD009718
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
          Categories
          Original Investigations

          Comments

          Comment on this article