5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Infant outcomes of certified nurse midwife attended home births: United States 2000 to 2004

      Journal of Perinatology
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

          To evaluate the safety of home births in North America involving direct entry midwives, in jurisdictions where the practice is not well integrated into the healthcare system. Prospective cohort study. All home births involving certified professional midwives across the United States (98% of cohort) and Canada, 2000. All 5418 women expecting to deliver in 2000 supported by midwives with a common certification and who planned to deliver at home when labour began. Intrapartum and neonatal mortality, perinatal transfer to hospital care, medical intervention during labour, breast feeding, and maternal satisfaction. 655 (12.1%) women who intended to deliver at home when labour began were transferred to hospital. Medical intervention rates included epidural (4.7%), episiotomy (2.1%), forceps (1.0%), vacuum extraction (0.6%), and caesarean section (3.7%); these rates were substantially lower than for low risk US women having hospital births. The intrapartum and neonatal mortality among women considered at low risk at start of labour, excluding deaths concerning life threatening congenital anomalies, was 1.7 deaths per 1000 planned home births, similar to risks in other studies of low risk home and hospital births in North America. No mothers died. No discrepancies were found for perinatal outcomes independently validated. Planned home birth for low risk women in North America using certified professional midwives was associated with lower rates of medical intervention but similar intrapartum and neonatal mortality to that of low risk hospital births in the United States.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of cesarean section on neonatal mortality rates among very preterm infants in the United States, 2000-2003.

            The objective of this analysis was to compare the neonatal mortality rates for infants delivered through primary cesarean section versus vaginal delivery, taking into consideration a number of potentially risk-modifying conditions. US linked birth and infant death certificate files for 2000-2003 were used. Demographic, medical, and labor and delivery complications were abstracted from the files with infant information. The primary outcome examined was neonatal death (death at 0-27 days of age). Because of concern regarding misclassification of gestational age, a procedure was used to trim away births for which the birth weight for a specific gestational age was incongruous. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for the risk of neonatal death relative to the mode of delivery (primary cesarean section versus vaginal delivery), using logistic regression analysis. There were data for 13,733 neonatal deaths and 106,809 survivors available from the trimmed data set for analysis for the 4-year period. More than 80% of pregnancies with delivery between 22 and 31 weeks of gestation experienced >or=1 risk factor. Adjusted odds ratios demonstrated significantly reduced risk of neonatal death for infants delivered through cesarean section at 22 to 25 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratios of 0.58, 0.52, 0.72, and 0.81 for 22, 23, 24, and 25 weeks, respectively). Cesarean section does seem to provide survival advantages for the most immature infants delivered at 22 to 25 weeks of gestation, independent of maternal risk factors for cesarean section.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Infant and neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to women with "no indicated risk," United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts.

              The percentage of United States' births delivered by cesarean section has increased rapidly in recent years, even for women considered to be at low risk for a cesarean section. The purpose of this paper is to examine infant and neonatal mortality risks associated with primary cesarean section compared with vaginal delivery for singleton full-term (37-41 weeks' gestation) women with no indicated medical risks or complications. National linked birth and infant death data for the 1998-2001 birth cohorts (5,762,037 live births and 11,897 infant deaths) were analyzed to assess the risk of infant and neonatal mortality for women with no indicated risk by method of delivery and cause of death. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model neonatal survival probabilities as a function of delivery method, and sociodemographic and medical risk factors. Neonatal mortality rates were higher among infants delivered by cesarean section (1.77 per 1,000 live births) than for those delivered vaginally (0.62). The magnitude of this difference was reduced only moderately on statistical adjustment for demographic and medical factors, and when deaths due to congenital malformations and events with Apgar scores less than 4 were excluded. The cesarean/vaginal mortality differential was widespread, and not confined to a few causes of death. Understanding the causes of these differentials is important, given the rapid growth in the number of primary cesareans without a reported medical indication.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Perinatology
                J Perinatol
                Springer Nature
                0743-8346
                1476-5543
                February 25 2010
                February 25 2010
                : 30
                : 9
                : 622-627
                Article
                10.1038/jp.2010.12
                e8a18bc0-e476-49ea-9881-ce07610dabe6
                © 2010
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article