Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Italy and the Comprehensive Agreement on Investments: disappointment over the process

      research-article
      Asia Europe Journal
      Springer Berlin Heidelberg

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The formal conclusion of the Comprehensive Agreement on Investments (CAI) has drawn much criticism. Criticisms for member states did not always recognise the same critical points. The case of Italy presents an instance in which the issue rather than laying in the content of the agreement was identified in the process. Not only had Italy been marginalised in the process of negotiation that led to the conclusion of the CAI, but also exponents from the government claim that leading negotiators, amongst which France and Germany, ignored Italy’s doubts about the deal when these were raised. Beyond politics, the paper shows that the Italian business community displays a response to the agreement in line with that of the rest of the EU in its positive assessment of the outcome.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          francesca.ghiretti@kcl.ac.uk
          Journal
          Asia Eur J
          Asia Eur J
          Asia Europe Journal
          Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
          1610-2932
          1612-1031
          25 July 2021
          25 July 2021
          : 1-8
          Affiliations
          GRID grid.20757.37, ISNI 0000000121849108, Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), ; Rome, Italy
          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5037-4487
          Article
          630
          10.1007/s10308-021-00630-6
          8310458
          34335126
          e8b89226-44b6-40f1-825b-031a789cf1eb
          © The Author(s) 2021

          Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

          History
          : 11 April 2021
          : 13 June 2021
          : 28 June 2021
          Categories
          Policy Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article