3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Ontogeny tends to recapitulate phylogeny in digital organisms.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Biologists have long debated whether ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny and, if so, why. Two plausible explanations are that (i) changes to early developmental stages are selected against because they tend to disrupt later development and (ii) simpler structures often precede more complex ones in both ontogeny and phylogeny if the former serve as building blocks for the latter. It is difficult to test these hypotheses experimentally in natural systems, so we used a computational system that exhibits evolutionary dynamics. We observed that ontogeny does indeed recapitulate phylogeny; traits that arose earlier in a lineage's history also tended to be expressed earlier in the development of individuals. The relative complexity of traits contributed substantially to this correlation, but a significant tendency toward recapitulation remained even after accounting for trait complexity. This additional effect provides evidence that selection against developmental disruption also contributed to the conservation of early stages in development.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am. Nat.
          The American naturalist
          1537-5323
          0003-0147
          Sep 2012
          : 180
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. jeffclune@cornell.edu
          Article
          10.1086/666984
          22854085
          e8efec78-cb19-45eb-9377-67a69ccf4ab0
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article