8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Females secrete growth hormone with more process irregularity than males in both humans and rats.

      The American journal of physiology
      Adult, Animals, Female, Fluorometry, Growth Hormone, secretion, Humans, Immunologic Techniques, Immunoradiometric Assay, Male, Models, Biological, Periodicity, Rats, Rats, Inbred Strains, Reference Values, Sex Characteristics, Specimen Handling, methods, Statistics as Topic

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In humans, serum growth hormone (GH) concentrations are significantly higher in women than in men, but the neuroendocrine mechanisms that underlie such gender differences are not known. We compared normal episodic GH secretion in males and females in three distinct settings: two human studies employing quite different assay techniques (immunoradiometric assay and a high-sensitivity immunofluorimetric method) and a rat study. To quantify the amount of regularity in data, we utilized approximate entropy (ApEn), a scale- and model-independent statistic. In each study, females exhibited significantly greater statistical irregularity in GH concentration series than their male counterparts (P < 10(-3) for each human study, P < 10(-6) for the rat study), implying that mass and mode of GH secretion are regulated differently in males and females. The regularity comparisons indicated complete gender separation (100% specificity and sensitivity) for the rat study and nearly complete separation for the immunofluorimetric assay study. The consistency and statistical significance of these findings suggest that this gender difference may be broadly based within higher animals and that this may be readily evaluated objectively by analysis of ApEn.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article