2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relationship between bite force, occlusal contact area, and three-dimensional facial soft tissue in dentofacial deformities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Purpose

          This study aimed to investigate three-dimensional facial soft tissue dimensions, maximum bite force (MBF), and occlusal contact area in patients with DFD. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between MBF and the three-dimensional facial measurements.

          Methods

          Thirty-two patients with skeletal Class III DFD and 20 patients with Class II DFD underwent a soft tissue evaluation using surface laser scanning, as well as MBF and occlusal contact area assessments. The DFD groups were compared with each other and with 25 healthy subjects.

          Results

          Significant morphological differences were found in the transversal, vertical, and anteroposterior dimensions between Class II DFD and Class III DFD. Both DFD groups presented an increased linear distance of chin height, which was strongly related with decreased MBF magnitude. The DFD groups exhibited lower MBF and occlusal contact area, with no significant differences between Class II and Class III DFD.

          Conclusion

          The presence of DFD affected 3D measurements of facial soft tissue, causing variations beyond normal limits, lower MBF, and occlusal contact area in both Class II and Class III DFD patients. The vertical dimension might have influenced the lower MBF magnitude in the studied skeletal deformities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status.

              Anthropometry involves the external measurement of morphological traits of human beings. It has a widespread and important place in nutritional assessment, and while the literature on anthropometric measurement and its interpretation is enormous, the extent to which measurement error can influence both measurement and interpretation of nutritional status is little considered. In this article, different types of anthropometric measurement error are reviewed, ways of estimating measurement error are critically evaluated, guidelines for acceptable error presented, and ways in which measures of error can be used to improve the interpretation of anthropometric nutritional status discussed. Possible errors are of two sorts; those that are associated with: (1) repeated measures giving the same value (unreliability, imprecision, undependability); and (2) measurements departing from true values (inaccuracy, bias). Imprecision is due largely to observer error, and is the most commonly used measure of anthropometric measurement error. This can be estimated by carrying out repeated anthropometric measures on the same subjects and calculating one or more of the following: technical error of measurement (TEM); percentage TEM, coefficient of reliability (R), and intraclass correlation coefficient. The first three of these measures are mathematically interrelated. Targets for training in anthropometry are at present far from perfect, and further work is needed in developing appropriate protocols for nutritional anthropometry training. Acceptable levels of measurement error are difficult to ascertain because TEM is age dependent, and the value is also related to the anthropometric characteristics of the group of population under investigation. R > 0.95 should be sought where possible, and reference values of maximum acceptable TEM at set levels of R using published data from the combined National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys I and II (Frisancho, 1990) are given. There is a clear hierarchy in the precision of different nutritional anthropometric measures, with weight and height being most precise. Waist and hip circumference show strong between-observer differences, and should, where possible, be carried out by one observer. Skinfolds can be associated with such large measurement error that interpretation is problematic. Ways are described in which measurement error can be used to assess the probability that differences in anthropometric measures across time within individuals are due to factors other than imprecision. Anthropometry is an important tool for nutritional assessment, and the techniques reported here should allow increased precision of measurement, and improved interpretation of anthropometric data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: data curationRole: formal analysisRole: writing original draftRole: writing review and editing
                Role: data curationRole: methodologyRole: formal analysis
                Role: methodologyRole: writing review
                Role: methodologyRole: formal analysisRole: writing review
                Role: conceptualizationRole: project administrationRole: formal analysisRole: writing review
                Journal
                Codas
                Codas
                codas
                CoDAS
                Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
                2317-1782
                29 April 2024
                2024
                : 36
                : 3
                : e20230203
                Affiliations
                [1 ] originalDepartamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto – FMRP, Universidade de São Paulo – USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brasil.
                [2 ] originalNúcleo de Apoio à Pesquisa em Morfofisiologia Craniofacial – NAP-CF, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto – FMRP, Universidade de São Paulo – USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brasil.
                Author notes

                Conflict of interests: nothing to declare.

                Correspondence address: Luciana Vitaliano Voi Trawitzki Departamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto – FMRP, Universidade de São Paulo – USP Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brasil, CEP: 14049-900. E-mail: luvoi@ 123456fmrp.usp.br
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0924-0409
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9123-2728
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0140-0244
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-5376
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2970-1113
                Article
                codasAO20230203_EN 00306
                10.1590/2317-1782/20242023203en
                11065403
                38695438
                e95b242f-9c03-4f96-939a-e56fba4614e3

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 August 2023
                : 10 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Equations: 1, References: 32
                Funding
                Funded by: Provost’s Office for Research of the University of São Paulo
                Award ID: 11.1.21626.01.7
                Funded by: CAPES
                Award ID: 001
                Categories
                Original Article

                dentofacial deformities,orthognathic surgery,three-dimensional imaging,bite force,mastication,stomatognathic system,myofunctional therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article